TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation Tool for Assessing a Newly Implemented Massive Transfusion Protocol
AU - Broxton, Shannon
AU - Medeiros, Regina
AU - Schumacher, Autumn
PY - 2017/1/1
Y1 - 2017/1/1
N2 - Exsanguination requires massive blood product replacement and termination of the bleeding source to prevent hemorrhagic shock and death. Massive transfusion protocols (MTPs) are algorithms that allow the health care team to quickly stabilize the bleeding patient and guide blood product administration. However, no national MTP guidelines or a standardized evaluation tool exist for collecting and reporting MTP-related data. The purpose of this article is to describe an original MTP evaluation tool, how it was used, barriers encountered, and a framework for reporting the MTP evaluation data. The evidence-based Broxton MTP Evaluation Tool was developed to evaluate the use of a newly implemented MTP via a retrospective review of electronic medical records (EMRs). Although the instrument itself worked well, barriers were encountered while reviewing the EMRs for the MTP evaluation. These barriers included no institutional entity was charged with tracking MTP activations, no searchable database was established to collect data concerning the MTP-activated patients, and no standard location in the EMR was designated for documenting the MTP activation. When devising protocols such as an MTP, a priori strategies should be developed for its implementation, documentation, and evaluation. Research is needed to determine best practices for evaluating an MTP to ensure positive patient outcomes with this protocol.
AB - Exsanguination requires massive blood product replacement and termination of the bleeding source to prevent hemorrhagic shock and death. Massive transfusion protocols (MTPs) are algorithms that allow the health care team to quickly stabilize the bleeding patient and guide blood product administration. However, no national MTP guidelines or a standardized evaluation tool exist for collecting and reporting MTP-related data. The purpose of this article is to describe an original MTP evaluation tool, how it was used, barriers encountered, and a framework for reporting the MTP evaluation data. The evidence-based Broxton MTP Evaluation Tool was developed to evaluate the use of a newly implemented MTP via a retrospective review of electronic medical records (EMRs). Although the instrument itself worked well, barriers were encountered while reviewing the EMRs for the MTP evaluation. These barriers included no institutional entity was charged with tracking MTP activations, no searchable database was established to collect data concerning the MTP-activated patients, and no standard location in the EMR was designated for documenting the MTP activation. When devising protocols such as an MTP, a priori strategies should be developed for its implementation, documentation, and evaluation. Research is needed to determine best practices for evaluating an MTP to ensure positive patient outcomes with this protocol.
KW - Electronic medical record review
KW - Massive transfusion protocol
KW - Protocol evaluation tool
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019872906&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019872906&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000285
DO - 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000285
M3 - Article
C2 - 28486321
AN - SCOPUS:85019872906
SN - 1078-7496
VL - 24
SP - 164
EP - 169
JO - Journal of trauma nursing : the official journal of the Society of Trauma Nurses
JF - Journal of trauma nursing : the official journal of the Society of Trauma Nurses
IS - 3
ER -