Evaluation Tool for Assessing a Newly Implemented Massive Transfusion Protocol

Shannon Broxton, Regina Medeiros, Autumn Schumacher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Exsanguination requires massive blood product replacement and termination of the bleeding source to prevent hemorrhagic shock and death. Massive transfusion protocols (MTPs) are algorithms that allow the health care team to quickly stabilize the bleeding patient and guide blood product administration. However, no national MTP guidelines or a standardized evaluation tool exist for collecting and reporting MTP-related data. The purpose of this article is to describe an original MTP evaluation tool, how it was used, barriers encountered, and a framework for reporting the MTP evaluation data. The evidence-based Broxton MTP Evaluation Tool was developed to evaluate the use of a newly implemented MTP via a retrospective review of electronic medical records (EMRs). Although the instrument itself worked well, barriers were encountered while reviewing the EMRs for the MTP evaluation. These barriers included no institutional entity was charged with tracking MTP activations, no searchable database was established to collect data concerning the MTP-activated patients, and no standard location in the EMR was designated for documenting the MTP activation. When devising protocols such as an MTP, a priori strategies should be developed for its implementation, documentation, and evaluation. Research is needed to determine best practices for evaluating an MTP to ensure positive patient outcomes with this protocol.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)164-169
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Trauma Nursing
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Electronic Health Records
Hemorrhage
Exsanguination
Patient Care Team
Hemorrhagic Shock
Practice Guidelines
Documentation
Databases
Guidelines
Research

Keywords

  • Electronic medical record review
  • Massive transfusion protocol
  • Protocol evaluation tool

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency
  • Critical Care
  • Advanced and Specialized Nursing

Cite this

Evaluation Tool for Assessing a Newly Implemented Massive Transfusion Protocol. / Broxton, Shannon; Medeiros, Regina; Schumacher, Autumn.

In: Journal of Trauma Nursing, Vol. 24, No. 3, 01.01.2017, p. 164-169.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Broxton, Shannon ; Medeiros, Regina ; Schumacher, Autumn. / Evaluation Tool for Assessing a Newly Implemented Massive Transfusion Protocol. In: Journal of Trauma Nursing. 2017 ; Vol. 24, No. 3. pp. 164-169.
@article{477001318a1d433e99ec23b434ba890a,
title = "Evaluation Tool for Assessing a Newly Implemented Massive Transfusion Protocol",
abstract = "Exsanguination requires massive blood product replacement and termination of the bleeding source to prevent hemorrhagic shock and death. Massive transfusion protocols (MTPs) are algorithms that allow the health care team to quickly stabilize the bleeding patient and guide blood product administration. However, no national MTP guidelines or a standardized evaluation tool exist for collecting and reporting MTP-related data. The purpose of this article is to describe an original MTP evaluation tool, how it was used, barriers encountered, and a framework for reporting the MTP evaluation data. The evidence-based Broxton MTP Evaluation Tool was developed to evaluate the use of a newly implemented MTP via a retrospective review of electronic medical records (EMRs). Although the instrument itself worked well, barriers were encountered while reviewing the EMRs for the MTP evaluation. These barriers included no institutional entity was charged with tracking MTP activations, no searchable database was established to collect data concerning the MTP-activated patients, and no standard location in the EMR was designated for documenting the MTP activation. When devising protocols such as an MTP, a priori strategies should be developed for its implementation, documentation, and evaluation. Research is needed to determine best practices for evaluating an MTP to ensure positive patient outcomes with this protocol.",
keywords = "Electronic medical record review, Massive transfusion protocol, Protocol evaluation tool",
author = "Shannon Broxton and Regina Medeiros and Autumn Schumacher",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/JTN.0000000000000285",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "164--169",
journal = "Journal of trauma nursing : the official journal of the Society of Trauma Nurses",
issn = "1078-7496",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation Tool for Assessing a Newly Implemented Massive Transfusion Protocol

AU - Broxton, Shannon

AU - Medeiros, Regina

AU - Schumacher, Autumn

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Exsanguination requires massive blood product replacement and termination of the bleeding source to prevent hemorrhagic shock and death. Massive transfusion protocols (MTPs) are algorithms that allow the health care team to quickly stabilize the bleeding patient and guide blood product administration. However, no national MTP guidelines or a standardized evaluation tool exist for collecting and reporting MTP-related data. The purpose of this article is to describe an original MTP evaluation tool, how it was used, barriers encountered, and a framework for reporting the MTP evaluation data. The evidence-based Broxton MTP Evaluation Tool was developed to evaluate the use of a newly implemented MTP via a retrospective review of electronic medical records (EMRs). Although the instrument itself worked well, barriers were encountered while reviewing the EMRs for the MTP evaluation. These barriers included no institutional entity was charged with tracking MTP activations, no searchable database was established to collect data concerning the MTP-activated patients, and no standard location in the EMR was designated for documenting the MTP activation. When devising protocols such as an MTP, a priori strategies should be developed for its implementation, documentation, and evaluation. Research is needed to determine best practices for evaluating an MTP to ensure positive patient outcomes with this protocol.

AB - Exsanguination requires massive blood product replacement and termination of the bleeding source to prevent hemorrhagic shock and death. Massive transfusion protocols (MTPs) are algorithms that allow the health care team to quickly stabilize the bleeding patient and guide blood product administration. However, no national MTP guidelines or a standardized evaluation tool exist for collecting and reporting MTP-related data. The purpose of this article is to describe an original MTP evaluation tool, how it was used, barriers encountered, and a framework for reporting the MTP evaluation data. The evidence-based Broxton MTP Evaluation Tool was developed to evaluate the use of a newly implemented MTP via a retrospective review of electronic medical records (EMRs). Although the instrument itself worked well, barriers were encountered while reviewing the EMRs for the MTP evaluation. These barriers included no institutional entity was charged with tracking MTP activations, no searchable database was established to collect data concerning the MTP-activated patients, and no standard location in the EMR was designated for documenting the MTP activation. When devising protocols such as an MTP, a priori strategies should be developed for its implementation, documentation, and evaluation. Research is needed to determine best practices for evaluating an MTP to ensure positive patient outcomes with this protocol.

KW - Electronic medical record review

KW - Massive transfusion protocol

KW - Protocol evaluation tool

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019872906&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019872906&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000285

DO - 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000285

M3 - Article

C2 - 28486321

AN - SCOPUS:85019872906

VL - 24

SP - 164

EP - 169

JO - Journal of trauma nursing : the official journal of the Society of Trauma Nurses

JF - Journal of trauma nursing : the official journal of the Society of Trauma Nurses

SN - 1078-7496

IS - 3

ER -