Evolutionary preferences for physical formidability in leaders

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This research uses evolutionary theory to evaluate followers' preferences for physically formidable leaders and to identify conditions that stimulate those preferences. It employs a population-based survey experiment (N ≥ 760), which offers the advantages to internal validity of experiments and external validity of a highly heterogeneous sample drawn from a nationally representative subject pool. The theoretical argument proffered here is followers tend to prefer leaders with greater physical formidability because of evolutionary adaptations derived from humans' violent ancestral environment. In this environment, individuals who allied with and ultimately followed physically powerful partners were more likely to acquire and retain important resources necessary for survival and reproduction because the presence of the physically powerful partner cued opponents to avoid a challenge for the resources or risk a costly confrontation. This argument suggests and the results indicate that threatening (war) and nonthreatening (peace, cooperation, and control) stimuli differentially motivate preferences for physically formidable leaders. In particular, the findings suggest threatening conditions lead to preferences for leaders with more powerful physical attributes, both anthropometric (i.e., weight, height, and body mass index) and perceptual (i.e., attributes of being "physically imposing or intimidating" and "physically strong"). Overall, this research offers a theoretical framework from which to understand this otherwise seemingly irrational phenomenon. Further, it advances the emerging but long-neglected investigation of biological effects on political behavior and has implications for a fundamental process in democratic society, leader selection.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)33-53
Number of pages21
JournalPolitics and the Life Sciences
Volume33
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2014

Fingerprint

leader
follower
evolutionary theory
political behavior
experiment
resources
peace
stimulus

Keywords

  • Leaders
  • evolutionary theory
  • followers
  • formidability
  • resource holding potential

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Public Administration

Cite this

Evolutionary preferences for physical formidability in leaders. / Murray, Gregory Roy.

In: Politics and the Life Sciences, Vol. 33, No. 1, 01.12.2014, p. 33-53.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{09388e3b8cc14d30b1e29f5b2bbc43f2,
title = "Evolutionary preferences for physical formidability in leaders",
abstract = "This research uses evolutionary theory to evaluate followers' preferences for physically formidable leaders and to identify conditions that stimulate those preferences. It employs a population-based survey experiment (N ≥ 760), which offers the advantages to internal validity of experiments and external validity of a highly heterogeneous sample drawn from a nationally representative subject pool. The theoretical argument proffered here is followers tend to prefer leaders with greater physical formidability because of evolutionary adaptations derived from humans' violent ancestral environment. In this environment, individuals who allied with and ultimately followed physically powerful partners were more likely to acquire and retain important resources necessary for survival and reproduction because the presence of the physically powerful partner cued opponents to avoid a challenge for the resources or risk a costly confrontation. This argument suggests and the results indicate that threatening (war) and nonthreatening (peace, cooperation, and control) stimuli differentially motivate preferences for physically formidable leaders. In particular, the findings suggest threatening conditions lead to preferences for leaders with more powerful physical attributes, both anthropometric (i.e., weight, height, and body mass index) and perceptual (i.e., attributes of being {"}physically imposing or intimidating{"} and {"}physically strong{"}). Overall, this research offers a theoretical framework from which to understand this otherwise seemingly irrational phenomenon. Further, it advances the emerging but long-neglected investigation of biological effects on political behavior and has implications for a fundamental process in democratic society, leader selection.",
keywords = "Leaders, evolutionary theory, followers, formidability, resource holding potential",
author = "Murray, {Gregory Roy}",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2990/33-1-33",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "33--53",
journal = "Politics and the Life Sciences",
issn = "0730-9384",
publisher = "Association for Politics and the Life Sciences",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evolutionary preferences for physical formidability in leaders

AU - Murray, Gregory Roy

PY - 2014/12/1

Y1 - 2014/12/1

N2 - This research uses evolutionary theory to evaluate followers' preferences for physically formidable leaders and to identify conditions that stimulate those preferences. It employs a population-based survey experiment (N ≥ 760), which offers the advantages to internal validity of experiments and external validity of a highly heterogeneous sample drawn from a nationally representative subject pool. The theoretical argument proffered here is followers tend to prefer leaders with greater physical formidability because of evolutionary adaptations derived from humans' violent ancestral environment. In this environment, individuals who allied with and ultimately followed physically powerful partners were more likely to acquire and retain important resources necessary for survival and reproduction because the presence of the physically powerful partner cued opponents to avoid a challenge for the resources or risk a costly confrontation. This argument suggests and the results indicate that threatening (war) and nonthreatening (peace, cooperation, and control) stimuli differentially motivate preferences for physically formidable leaders. In particular, the findings suggest threatening conditions lead to preferences for leaders with more powerful physical attributes, both anthropometric (i.e., weight, height, and body mass index) and perceptual (i.e., attributes of being "physically imposing or intimidating" and "physically strong"). Overall, this research offers a theoretical framework from which to understand this otherwise seemingly irrational phenomenon. Further, it advances the emerging but long-neglected investigation of biological effects on political behavior and has implications for a fundamental process in democratic society, leader selection.

AB - This research uses evolutionary theory to evaluate followers' preferences for physically formidable leaders and to identify conditions that stimulate those preferences. It employs a population-based survey experiment (N ≥ 760), which offers the advantages to internal validity of experiments and external validity of a highly heterogeneous sample drawn from a nationally representative subject pool. The theoretical argument proffered here is followers tend to prefer leaders with greater physical formidability because of evolutionary adaptations derived from humans' violent ancestral environment. In this environment, individuals who allied with and ultimately followed physically powerful partners were more likely to acquire and retain important resources necessary for survival and reproduction because the presence of the physically powerful partner cued opponents to avoid a challenge for the resources or risk a costly confrontation. This argument suggests and the results indicate that threatening (war) and nonthreatening (peace, cooperation, and control) stimuli differentially motivate preferences for physically formidable leaders. In particular, the findings suggest threatening conditions lead to preferences for leaders with more powerful physical attributes, both anthropometric (i.e., weight, height, and body mass index) and perceptual (i.e., attributes of being "physically imposing or intimidating" and "physically strong"). Overall, this research offers a theoretical framework from which to understand this otherwise seemingly irrational phenomenon. Further, it advances the emerging but long-neglected investigation of biological effects on political behavior and has implications for a fundamental process in democratic society, leader selection.

KW - Leaders

KW - evolutionary theory

KW - followers

KW - formidability

KW - resource holding potential

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84918541990&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84918541990&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2990/33-1-33

DO - 10.2990/33-1-33

M3 - Article

C2 - 25514522

AN - SCOPUS:84918541990

VL - 33

SP - 33

EP - 53

JO - Politics and the Life Sciences

JF - Politics and the Life Sciences

SN - 0730-9384

IS - 1

ER -