Examination of the factor structure of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire

Leigh A. Lehman, Michelle Woodbury, Craig A. Velozo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire is a global scale evaluating the impact of upper-extremity disorders. We sought to validate or challenge the unidimensional factor structure of the DASH. METHOD. Secondary analysis was performed on data collected from outpatient clinics. Factor analysis was performed in two steps, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). To provide further support for unidimensionality, fit statistics were calculated using the Andrich Rasch ratingscale model. RESULTS. EFA revealed three potential factors (eigenvalues = 18.40, 1.56, and 1.54). CFA was performed fitting a three-factor model. Tucker-Lewis Index (.99) and standardized root mean square residual (.05) values indicated good fit. Comparative fit index (.89) and root mean square error of approximation (.13) did not. When divided into three constructs, only one item misfit. CONCLUSION. More research is needed to determine situations in which division of the DASH may enhance interpretability.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)169-178
Number of pages10
JournalAmerican Journal of Occupational Therapy
Volume65
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2011

Fingerprint

Statistical Factor Analysis
Arm
Hand
Ambulatory Care Facilities
Upper Extremity
Surveys and Questionnaires
Research

Keywords

  • Data interpretation
  • Disability evaluation
  • Factor analysis
  • Statistical
  • Upper extremity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Occupational Therapy

Cite this

Examination of the factor structure of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire. / Lehman, Leigh A.; Woodbury, Michelle; Velozo, Craig A.

In: American Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 65, No. 2, 01.03.2011, p. 169-178.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lehman, Leigh A. ; Woodbury, Michelle ; Velozo, Craig A. / Examination of the factor structure of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire. In: American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2011 ; Vol. 65, No. 2. pp. 169-178.
@article{15ac9038331a4493aa65d90b45752d6d,
title = "Examination of the factor structure of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire is a global scale evaluating the impact of upper-extremity disorders. We sought to validate or challenge the unidimensional factor structure of the DASH. METHOD. Secondary analysis was performed on data collected from outpatient clinics. Factor analysis was performed in two steps, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). To provide further support for unidimensionality, fit statistics were calculated using the Andrich Rasch ratingscale model. RESULTS. EFA revealed three potential factors (eigenvalues = 18.40, 1.56, and 1.54). CFA was performed fitting a three-factor model. Tucker-Lewis Index (.99) and standardized root mean square residual (.05) values indicated good fit. Comparative fit index (.89) and root mean square error of approximation (.13) did not. When divided into three constructs, only one item misfit. CONCLUSION. More research is needed to determine situations in which division of the DASH may enhance interpretability.",
keywords = "Data interpretation, Disability evaluation, Factor analysis, Statistical, Upper extremity",
author = "Lehman, {Leigh A.} and Michelle Woodbury and Velozo, {Craig A.}",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5014/ajot.2011.000794",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "65",
pages = "169--178",
journal = "American Journal of Occupational Therapy",
issn = "0272-9490",
publisher = "American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Examination of the factor structure of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire

AU - Lehman, Leigh A.

AU - Woodbury, Michelle

AU - Velozo, Craig A.

PY - 2011/3/1

Y1 - 2011/3/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire is a global scale evaluating the impact of upper-extremity disorders. We sought to validate or challenge the unidimensional factor structure of the DASH. METHOD. Secondary analysis was performed on data collected from outpatient clinics. Factor analysis was performed in two steps, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). To provide further support for unidimensionality, fit statistics were calculated using the Andrich Rasch ratingscale model. RESULTS. EFA revealed three potential factors (eigenvalues = 18.40, 1.56, and 1.54). CFA was performed fitting a three-factor model. Tucker-Lewis Index (.99) and standardized root mean square residual (.05) values indicated good fit. Comparative fit index (.89) and root mean square error of approximation (.13) did not. When divided into three constructs, only one item misfit. CONCLUSION. More research is needed to determine situations in which division of the DASH may enhance interpretability.

AB - OBJECTIVE. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire is a global scale evaluating the impact of upper-extremity disorders. We sought to validate or challenge the unidimensional factor structure of the DASH. METHOD. Secondary analysis was performed on data collected from outpatient clinics. Factor analysis was performed in two steps, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). To provide further support for unidimensionality, fit statistics were calculated using the Andrich Rasch ratingscale model. RESULTS. EFA revealed three potential factors (eigenvalues = 18.40, 1.56, and 1.54). CFA was performed fitting a three-factor model. Tucker-Lewis Index (.99) and standardized root mean square residual (.05) values indicated good fit. Comparative fit index (.89) and root mean square error of approximation (.13) did not. When divided into three constructs, only one item misfit. CONCLUSION. More research is needed to determine situations in which division of the DASH may enhance interpretability.

KW - Data interpretation

KW - Disability evaluation

KW - Factor analysis

KW - Statistical

KW - Upper extremity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79954529330&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79954529330&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5014/ajot.2011.000794

DO - 10.5014/ajot.2011.000794

M3 - Article

C2 - 21476364

AN - SCOPUS:79954529330

VL - 65

SP - 169

EP - 178

JO - American Journal of Occupational Therapy

JF - American Journal of Occupational Therapy

SN - 0272-9490

IS - 2

ER -