Examining the Effects of Information, Attorney Capability, and Amicus Participation on U.S. Supreme Court Decision Making

John Szmer, Martha H Ginn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Focusing on litigators or amicus curiae, a significant amount of scholarship has examined the impact of information on Supreme Court decision making. Taking into account that justices have varying degrees of substantive expertise across issues, we model the interaction of justice expertise with these external sources of information. Specifically, we test whether justices are more likely to be influenced by attorney capability in cases where they have less substantive legal expertise. We also explore whether justices' reliance on amici is conditional on their own expertise, as well as the overall quality of the litigants' attorneys. As anticipated, this research finds that as the justice's legal expertise increases, the influence of attorney capability tends to decrease. Moreover, as the expertise of the judge and/or the quality of the attorneys increase, the impact of amici tends to decrease.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)441-471
Number of pages31
JournalAmerican Politics Research
Volume42
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

court decision
Supreme Court
expertise
decision making
justice
participation
source of information
interaction

Keywords

  • amicus curiae
  • attorney
  • judicial decision making
  • justice expertise
  • lawyer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Examining the Effects of Information, Attorney Capability, and Amicus Participation on U.S. Supreme Court Decision Making. / Szmer, John; Ginn, Martha H.

In: American Politics Research, Vol. 42, No. 3, 01.01.2014, p. 441-471.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{edd8e175464442c283450b69275b35b1,
title = "Examining the Effects of Information, Attorney Capability, and Amicus Participation on U.S. Supreme Court Decision Making",
abstract = "Focusing on litigators or amicus curiae, a significant amount of scholarship has examined the impact of information on Supreme Court decision making. Taking into account that justices have varying degrees of substantive expertise across issues, we model the interaction of justice expertise with these external sources of information. Specifically, we test whether justices are more likely to be influenced by attorney capability in cases where they have less substantive legal expertise. We also explore whether justices' reliance on amici is conditional on their own expertise, as well as the overall quality of the litigants' attorneys. As anticipated, this research finds that as the justice's legal expertise increases, the influence of attorney capability tends to decrease. Moreover, as the expertise of the judge and/or the quality of the attorneys increase, the impact of amici tends to decrease.",
keywords = "amicus curiae, attorney, judicial decision making, justice expertise, lawyer",
author = "John Szmer and Ginn, {Martha H}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1532673X13502219",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "441--471",
journal = "American Politics Research",
issn = "1532-673X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Examining the Effects of Information, Attorney Capability, and Amicus Participation on U.S. Supreme Court Decision Making

AU - Szmer, John

AU - Ginn, Martha H

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Focusing on litigators or amicus curiae, a significant amount of scholarship has examined the impact of information on Supreme Court decision making. Taking into account that justices have varying degrees of substantive expertise across issues, we model the interaction of justice expertise with these external sources of information. Specifically, we test whether justices are more likely to be influenced by attorney capability in cases where they have less substantive legal expertise. We also explore whether justices' reliance on amici is conditional on their own expertise, as well as the overall quality of the litigants' attorneys. As anticipated, this research finds that as the justice's legal expertise increases, the influence of attorney capability tends to decrease. Moreover, as the expertise of the judge and/or the quality of the attorneys increase, the impact of amici tends to decrease.

AB - Focusing on litigators or amicus curiae, a significant amount of scholarship has examined the impact of information on Supreme Court decision making. Taking into account that justices have varying degrees of substantive expertise across issues, we model the interaction of justice expertise with these external sources of information. Specifically, we test whether justices are more likely to be influenced by attorney capability in cases where they have less substantive legal expertise. We also explore whether justices' reliance on amici is conditional on their own expertise, as well as the overall quality of the litigants' attorneys. As anticipated, this research finds that as the justice's legal expertise increases, the influence of attorney capability tends to decrease. Moreover, as the expertise of the judge and/or the quality of the attorneys increase, the impact of amici tends to decrease.

KW - amicus curiae

KW - attorney

KW - judicial decision making

KW - justice expertise

KW - lawyer

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84898680785&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84898680785&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1532673X13502219

DO - 10.1177/1532673X13502219

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 441

EP - 471

JO - American Politics Research

JF - American Politics Research

SN - 1532-673X

IS - 3

ER -