Expert Testimony of the Battered Person Syndrome, Defendant Gender, and Sexual Orientation in a Case of Duress

Evaluating Legal Decisions

Brenda Russell, Laurie Lynn Ragatz, Shane W. Kraus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The current study examined the utility of expert testimony of the battered person syndrome (BPS) in a case of duress and the extent to which defendant gender, defendant sexual orientation, and participant gender influence mock jury decisions in a case of duress. Participants (N = 413) read a scenario based on U. S. v. Dixon (2006) and answered questions assessing verdict, guilt, sentence length, duress legal elements, and attributes typically ascribed to victims of abuse. Results showed heterosexual female defendants were assigned the lowest sentences and met more of the legal elements of duress (i. e., were coerced, more likely to be believed, and purchased a gun to prevent harm) and attributes (i. e., experienced severe abuse, learned helplessness) compared to other defendants. When mock jurors received expert testimony, they provided lower rates of guilt and sentencing for defendants. Results also showed the inclusion of BPS expert testimony increased ratings for many of the legal elements of duress and attributes typically associated with intimate partner violence. In addition, results suggested that while heterosexual female defendants are more likely to be believed in a case of duress, expert testimony of BPS is helpful to all defendants. Limitations and future directions for research and practice are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)659-670
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Family Violence
Volume27
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 13 2012

Fingerprint

Expert Testimony
sexual orientation
testimony
Sexual Behavior
expert
Guilt
human being
Heterosexuality
gender
guilt
abuse
Learned Helplessness
Firearms
rating
inclusion
violence
scenario
Research

Keywords

  • Battered person syndrome
  • Duress
  • Expert testimony
  • Gender
  • Guilt
  • Sexual orientation
  • Verdict

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Law

Cite this

Expert Testimony of the Battered Person Syndrome, Defendant Gender, and Sexual Orientation in a Case of Duress : Evaluating Legal Decisions. / Russell, Brenda; Ragatz, Laurie Lynn; Kraus, Shane W.

In: Journal of Family Violence, Vol. 27, No. 7, 13.08.2012, p. 659-670.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{140cf808727842968db3954d1a42863d,
title = "Expert Testimony of the Battered Person Syndrome, Defendant Gender, and Sexual Orientation in a Case of Duress: Evaluating Legal Decisions",
abstract = "The current study examined the utility of expert testimony of the battered person syndrome (BPS) in a case of duress and the extent to which defendant gender, defendant sexual orientation, and participant gender influence mock jury decisions in a case of duress. Participants (N = 413) read a scenario based on U. S. v. Dixon (2006) and answered questions assessing verdict, guilt, sentence length, duress legal elements, and attributes typically ascribed to victims of abuse. Results showed heterosexual female defendants were assigned the lowest sentences and met more of the legal elements of duress (i. e., were coerced, more likely to be believed, and purchased a gun to prevent harm) and attributes (i. e., experienced severe abuse, learned helplessness) compared to other defendants. When mock jurors received expert testimony, they provided lower rates of guilt and sentencing for defendants. Results also showed the inclusion of BPS expert testimony increased ratings for many of the legal elements of duress and attributes typically associated with intimate partner violence. In addition, results suggested that while heterosexual female defendants are more likely to be believed in a case of duress, expert testimony of BPS is helpful to all defendants. Limitations and future directions for research and practice are discussed.",
keywords = "Battered person syndrome, Duress, Expert testimony, Gender, Guilt, Sexual orientation, Verdict",
author = "Brenda Russell and Ragatz, {Laurie Lynn} and Kraus, {Shane W.}",
year = "2012",
month = "8",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1007/s10896-012-9459-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "659--670",
journal = "Journal of Fluorescence",
issn = "1053-0509",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Expert Testimony of the Battered Person Syndrome, Defendant Gender, and Sexual Orientation in a Case of Duress

T2 - Evaluating Legal Decisions

AU - Russell, Brenda

AU - Ragatz, Laurie Lynn

AU - Kraus, Shane W.

PY - 2012/8/13

Y1 - 2012/8/13

N2 - The current study examined the utility of expert testimony of the battered person syndrome (BPS) in a case of duress and the extent to which defendant gender, defendant sexual orientation, and participant gender influence mock jury decisions in a case of duress. Participants (N = 413) read a scenario based on U. S. v. Dixon (2006) and answered questions assessing verdict, guilt, sentence length, duress legal elements, and attributes typically ascribed to victims of abuse. Results showed heterosexual female defendants were assigned the lowest sentences and met more of the legal elements of duress (i. e., were coerced, more likely to be believed, and purchased a gun to prevent harm) and attributes (i. e., experienced severe abuse, learned helplessness) compared to other defendants. When mock jurors received expert testimony, they provided lower rates of guilt and sentencing for defendants. Results also showed the inclusion of BPS expert testimony increased ratings for many of the legal elements of duress and attributes typically associated with intimate partner violence. In addition, results suggested that while heterosexual female defendants are more likely to be believed in a case of duress, expert testimony of BPS is helpful to all defendants. Limitations and future directions for research and practice are discussed.

AB - The current study examined the utility of expert testimony of the battered person syndrome (BPS) in a case of duress and the extent to which defendant gender, defendant sexual orientation, and participant gender influence mock jury decisions in a case of duress. Participants (N = 413) read a scenario based on U. S. v. Dixon (2006) and answered questions assessing verdict, guilt, sentence length, duress legal elements, and attributes typically ascribed to victims of abuse. Results showed heterosexual female defendants were assigned the lowest sentences and met more of the legal elements of duress (i. e., were coerced, more likely to be believed, and purchased a gun to prevent harm) and attributes (i. e., experienced severe abuse, learned helplessness) compared to other defendants. When mock jurors received expert testimony, they provided lower rates of guilt and sentencing for defendants. Results also showed the inclusion of BPS expert testimony increased ratings for many of the legal elements of duress and attributes typically associated with intimate partner violence. In addition, results suggested that while heterosexual female defendants are more likely to be believed in a case of duress, expert testimony of BPS is helpful to all defendants. Limitations and future directions for research and practice are discussed.

KW - Battered person syndrome

KW - Duress

KW - Expert testimony

KW - Gender

KW - Guilt

KW - Sexual orientation

KW - Verdict

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866730588&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866730588&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10896-012-9459-8

DO - 10.1007/s10896-012-9459-8

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 659

EP - 670

JO - Journal of Fluorescence

JF - Journal of Fluorescence

SN - 1053-0509

IS - 7

ER -