Exploring patient perspectives of prediabetes and diabetes severity

a qualitative study

Dean Seehusen, Carla L. Fisher, Heather A. Rider, Angela B. Seehusen, Jasmyne J. Womack, Jeremy T. Jackson, Paul F. Crawford, Christy J.W. Ledford

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: This qualitative study sought to identify and describe patients’ variant perceptions of disease severity after receiving a type 2 diabetes (T2DM) or prediabetes (preDM) diagnosis. Design: Researchers interviewed 29 patients from two US medical centers to ascertain perceptions of severity. We used the constant comparative method from a grounded theory approach to identify themes from patients’ perspectives that inform their disease severity. This approach was used to help translate research to practice and ultimately identify intervention strategies informed by authentic experiences of preDM and T2DM patients. Results: Perceptions of disease severity fell into two groups: high and low severity. Patients diagnosed with T2DM and preDM emerged in both groups and were comparative in terms of sample size, gender, and ethnic diversity. Several factors contributed to patients’ beliefs, including what they were told about the disease, observations from experiences within their own social network, and information from formal diabetes classes and their own research. The two perspectives diverged when patients described how their belief was informed by three thematic properties or personal factors: (i) fears; (ii) clinician communication; and (iii) social comparisons. Conclusions: Beliefs about severity are influenced by patients’ fears, interactions with clinicians, and experiences within their social networks. These findings show that when interacting with patients with T2DM or preDM, clinicians should elicit patient perceptions of disease severity so they may then tailor the discussion to address these perceptions and help patients grasp the severity of these conditions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPsychology and Health
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Prediabetic State
Social Support
Fear
Research
Sample Size
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Communication
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • Diabetes mellitus
  • health belief model
  • patient communication
  • patient education
  • prediabetes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Seehusen, D., Fisher, C. L., Rider, H. A., Seehusen, A. B., Womack, J. J., Jackson, J. T., ... Ledford, C. J. W. (2019). Exploring patient perspectives of prediabetes and diabetes severity: a qualitative study. Psychology and Health. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2019.1604955

Exploring patient perspectives of prediabetes and diabetes severity : a qualitative study. / Seehusen, Dean; Fisher, Carla L.; Rider, Heather A.; Seehusen, Angela B.; Womack, Jasmyne J.; Jackson, Jeremy T.; Crawford, Paul F.; Ledford, Christy J.W.

In: Psychology and Health, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Seehusen, Dean ; Fisher, Carla L. ; Rider, Heather A. ; Seehusen, Angela B. ; Womack, Jasmyne J. ; Jackson, Jeremy T. ; Crawford, Paul F. ; Ledford, Christy J.W. / Exploring patient perspectives of prediabetes and diabetes severity : a qualitative study. In: Psychology and Health. 2019.
@article{cafb111b28554ac3bb18c6bf2402129c,
title = "Exploring patient perspectives of prediabetes and diabetes severity: a qualitative study",
abstract = "Objective: This qualitative study sought to identify and describe patients’ variant perceptions of disease severity after receiving a type 2 diabetes (T2DM) or prediabetes (preDM) diagnosis. Design: Researchers interviewed 29 patients from two US medical centers to ascertain perceptions of severity. We used the constant comparative method from a grounded theory approach to identify themes from patients’ perspectives that inform their disease severity. This approach was used to help translate research to practice and ultimately identify intervention strategies informed by authentic experiences of preDM and T2DM patients. Results: Perceptions of disease severity fell into two groups: high and low severity. Patients diagnosed with T2DM and preDM emerged in both groups and were comparative in terms of sample size, gender, and ethnic diversity. Several factors contributed to patients’ beliefs, including what they were told about the disease, observations from experiences within their own social network, and information from formal diabetes classes and their own research. The two perspectives diverged when patients described how their belief was informed by three thematic properties or personal factors: (i) fears; (ii) clinician communication; and (iii) social comparisons. Conclusions: Beliefs about severity are influenced by patients’ fears, interactions with clinicians, and experiences within their social networks. These findings show that when interacting with patients with T2DM or preDM, clinicians should elicit patient perceptions of disease severity so they may then tailor the discussion to address these perceptions and help patients grasp the severity of these conditions.",
keywords = "Diabetes mellitus, health belief model, patient communication, patient education, prediabetes",
author = "Dean Seehusen and Fisher, {Carla L.} and Rider, {Heather A.} and Seehusen, {Angela B.} and Womack, {Jasmyne J.} and Jackson, {Jeremy T.} and Crawford, {Paul F.} and Ledford, {Christy J.W.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/08870446.2019.1604955",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Psychology and Health",
issn = "0887-0446",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring patient perspectives of prediabetes and diabetes severity

T2 - a qualitative study

AU - Seehusen, Dean

AU - Fisher, Carla L.

AU - Rider, Heather A.

AU - Seehusen, Angela B.

AU - Womack, Jasmyne J.

AU - Jackson, Jeremy T.

AU - Crawford, Paul F.

AU - Ledford, Christy J.W.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Objective: This qualitative study sought to identify and describe patients’ variant perceptions of disease severity after receiving a type 2 diabetes (T2DM) or prediabetes (preDM) diagnosis. Design: Researchers interviewed 29 patients from two US medical centers to ascertain perceptions of severity. We used the constant comparative method from a grounded theory approach to identify themes from patients’ perspectives that inform their disease severity. This approach was used to help translate research to practice and ultimately identify intervention strategies informed by authentic experiences of preDM and T2DM patients. Results: Perceptions of disease severity fell into two groups: high and low severity. Patients diagnosed with T2DM and preDM emerged in both groups and were comparative in terms of sample size, gender, and ethnic diversity. Several factors contributed to patients’ beliefs, including what they were told about the disease, observations from experiences within their own social network, and information from formal diabetes classes and their own research. The two perspectives diverged when patients described how their belief was informed by three thematic properties or personal factors: (i) fears; (ii) clinician communication; and (iii) social comparisons. Conclusions: Beliefs about severity are influenced by patients’ fears, interactions with clinicians, and experiences within their social networks. These findings show that when interacting with patients with T2DM or preDM, clinicians should elicit patient perceptions of disease severity so they may then tailor the discussion to address these perceptions and help patients grasp the severity of these conditions.

AB - Objective: This qualitative study sought to identify and describe patients’ variant perceptions of disease severity after receiving a type 2 diabetes (T2DM) or prediabetes (preDM) diagnosis. Design: Researchers interviewed 29 patients from two US medical centers to ascertain perceptions of severity. We used the constant comparative method from a grounded theory approach to identify themes from patients’ perspectives that inform their disease severity. This approach was used to help translate research to practice and ultimately identify intervention strategies informed by authentic experiences of preDM and T2DM patients. Results: Perceptions of disease severity fell into two groups: high and low severity. Patients diagnosed with T2DM and preDM emerged in both groups and were comparative in terms of sample size, gender, and ethnic diversity. Several factors contributed to patients’ beliefs, including what they were told about the disease, observations from experiences within their own social network, and information from formal diabetes classes and their own research. The two perspectives diverged when patients described how their belief was informed by three thematic properties or personal factors: (i) fears; (ii) clinician communication; and (iii) social comparisons. Conclusions: Beliefs about severity are influenced by patients’ fears, interactions with clinicians, and experiences within their social networks. These findings show that when interacting with patients with T2DM or preDM, clinicians should elicit patient perceptions of disease severity so they may then tailor the discussion to address these perceptions and help patients grasp the severity of these conditions.

KW - Diabetes mellitus

KW - health belief model

KW - patient communication

KW - patient education

KW - prediabetes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064740388&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064740388&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/08870446.2019.1604955

DO - 10.1080/08870446.2019.1604955

M3 - Article

JO - Psychology and Health

JF - Psychology and Health

SN - 0887-0446

ER -