TY - JOUR
T1 - Exploring the Factor Structure of the Social Cognition and Object Relations–Global Rating Method
T2 - Support for Two- and Three-Factor Models
AU - Siefert, Caleb J.
AU - Stein, Michelle
AU - Slavin-Mulford, Jenelle
AU - Haggerty, Greg
AU - Sinclair, Samuel J.
AU - Funke, Danielle
AU - Blais, Mark A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Taylor & Francis.
PY - 2018/3/4
Y1 - 2018/3/4
N2 - The Social Cognition and Object Relations Scales–Global Rating Method (SCORS–G) contains 8 scales for coding narrative content. This study explores the factor structure of this measure using college (n = 171), outpatient (n = 239), and inpatient (n = 78) samples. Participants told stories to the Thematic Apperception Test (TAT; Murray, 1943) cards. Stories were transcribed and coded by blind raters using the SCORS–G. Cases were randomly assigned to an exploratory or validation group. Exploratory factor analysis with the exploratory group suggested 2- and 3-factor models. The Emotional Investment in Relationships (EIR) scale did not obtain a primary loading on any factor and was not included in subsequentmodels. After modifications, confirmatory factor analysis indicated good-to-adequate fit for 2- and 3-factor models. Both models showed good fit in the validation group and met criteria for invariance across models. Findings indicated that some SCORS–G scales tap cognitive-structural elements, whereas others assess affective-relational components of narratives. We found mild support separating the affective-relational scales in terms of internal representations for the self and others and relationships. The results reported here indicate that clinicians and researchers can calculate a separate cognitive-structural composite score and an affective-relational composite score when using the SCORS–G to rate TAT stories.
AB - The Social Cognition and Object Relations Scales–Global Rating Method (SCORS–G) contains 8 scales for coding narrative content. This study explores the factor structure of this measure using college (n = 171), outpatient (n = 239), and inpatient (n = 78) samples. Participants told stories to the Thematic Apperception Test (TAT; Murray, 1943) cards. Stories were transcribed and coded by blind raters using the SCORS–G. Cases were randomly assigned to an exploratory or validation group. Exploratory factor analysis with the exploratory group suggested 2- and 3-factor models. The Emotional Investment in Relationships (EIR) scale did not obtain a primary loading on any factor and was not included in subsequentmodels. After modifications, confirmatory factor analysis indicated good-to-adequate fit for 2- and 3-factor models. Both models showed good fit in the validation group and met criteria for invariance across models. Findings indicated that some SCORS–G scales tap cognitive-structural elements, whereas others assess affective-relational components of narratives. We found mild support separating the affective-relational scales in terms of internal representations for the self and others and relationships. The results reported here indicate that clinicians and researchers can calculate a separate cognitive-structural composite score and an affective-relational composite score when using the SCORS–G to rate TAT stories.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021246912&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021246912&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/00223891.2017.1336716
DO - 10.1080/00223891.2017.1336716
M3 - Article
C2 - 28644680
AN - SCOPUS:85021246912
SN - 0022-3891
VL - 100
SP - 122
EP - 134
JO - Journal of Personality Assessment
JF - Journal of Personality Assessment
IS - 2
ER -