Extracapsular dissection for benign parotid tumors: A meta-analysis

William Greer Albergotti, Shaun A. Nguyen, Johannes Zenk, M. Boyd Gillespie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

50 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives/Hypothesis: Recent studies suggest that extracapsular dissection (ECD) is an option for the resection of certain benign parotid tumors. This study investigates complication rates and effectiveness of ECD versus superficial parotidectomy (SP) for the treatment of primary benign parotid neoplasms. Study Design: Systematic literature review with meta-analysis. Methods: Studies available for inclusion evaluated the complications and effectiveness of ECD and SP as surgical techniques for the treatment of solitary, benign parotid tumors. An Ovid/Medline search revealed nine articles that met inclusion criteria. A critical review and meta-analysis of these articles was performed. Results: The included studies evaluated a total of 1,882 patients. There was no observed difference in tumor recurrence between the ECD and SP groups (odds ratio [OR], 0.557; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.271-1.147). There was a significantly lower rate of transient facial nerve paresis (OR, 0.256; 95% CI, 0.174-0.377) in the ECD group (59 of 741; 8.0%) compared to the SP group (81 of 397; 20.4%); however, there was no observed difference in permanent facial paralysis between the ECD and SP groups (OR, 0.878; 95% CI, 0.282-2.730). Frey's syndrome was less often observed (OR, 0.117; 95% CI, 0.071-0.191) after ECD (27 of 602; 4.5%) compared to SP (75 of 287; 26.1%). Conclusions: This systematic review with meta-analysis suggests that ECD has a similar recurrence rate as SP with fewer postoperative complications. ECD may be considered an alternative surgical modality for select benign parotid neoplasms.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1954-1960
Number of pages7
JournalLaryngoscope
Volume122
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2012

Fingerprint

Meta-Analysis
Dissection
Neoplasms
Parotid Neoplasms
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Facial Paralysis
Gustatory Sweating
Recurrence
Facial Nerve
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Parotid neoplasm
  • extracapsular dissection
  • parotid surgery
  • parotid tumor
  • parotidectomy
  • superficial parotidectomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Extracapsular dissection for benign parotid tumors : A meta-analysis. / Albergotti, William Greer; Nguyen, Shaun A.; Zenk, Johannes; Gillespie, M. Boyd.

In: Laryngoscope, Vol. 122, No. 9, 01.09.2012, p. 1954-1960.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Albergotti, William Greer ; Nguyen, Shaun A. ; Zenk, Johannes ; Gillespie, M. Boyd. / Extracapsular dissection for benign parotid tumors : A meta-analysis. In: Laryngoscope. 2012 ; Vol. 122, No. 9. pp. 1954-1960.
@article{6631412cc7854b32ac3bff3635c44848,
title = "Extracapsular dissection for benign parotid tumors: A meta-analysis",
abstract = "Objectives/Hypothesis: Recent studies suggest that extracapsular dissection (ECD) is an option for the resection of certain benign parotid tumors. This study investigates complication rates and effectiveness of ECD versus superficial parotidectomy (SP) for the treatment of primary benign parotid neoplasms. Study Design: Systematic literature review with meta-analysis. Methods: Studies available for inclusion evaluated the complications and effectiveness of ECD and SP as surgical techniques for the treatment of solitary, benign parotid tumors. An Ovid/Medline search revealed nine articles that met inclusion criteria. A critical review and meta-analysis of these articles was performed. Results: The included studies evaluated a total of 1,882 patients. There was no observed difference in tumor recurrence between the ECD and SP groups (odds ratio [OR], 0.557; 95{\%} confidence interval [CI], 0.271-1.147). There was a significantly lower rate of transient facial nerve paresis (OR, 0.256; 95{\%} CI, 0.174-0.377) in the ECD group (59 of 741; 8.0{\%}) compared to the SP group (81 of 397; 20.4{\%}); however, there was no observed difference in permanent facial paralysis between the ECD and SP groups (OR, 0.878; 95{\%} CI, 0.282-2.730). Frey's syndrome was less often observed (OR, 0.117; 95{\%} CI, 0.071-0.191) after ECD (27 of 602; 4.5{\%}) compared to SP (75 of 287; 26.1{\%}). Conclusions: This systematic review with meta-analysis suggests that ECD has a similar recurrence rate as SP with fewer postoperative complications. ECD may be considered an alternative surgical modality for select benign parotid neoplasms.",
keywords = "Parotid neoplasm, extracapsular dissection, parotid surgery, parotid tumor, parotidectomy, superficial parotidectomy",
author = "Albergotti, {William Greer} and Nguyen, {Shaun A.} and Johannes Zenk and Gillespie, {M. Boyd}",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/lary.23396",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "122",
pages = "1954--1960",
journal = "Laryngoscope",
issn = "0023-852X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Extracapsular dissection for benign parotid tumors

T2 - A meta-analysis

AU - Albergotti, William Greer

AU - Nguyen, Shaun A.

AU - Zenk, Johannes

AU - Gillespie, M. Boyd

PY - 2012/9/1

Y1 - 2012/9/1

N2 - Objectives/Hypothesis: Recent studies suggest that extracapsular dissection (ECD) is an option for the resection of certain benign parotid tumors. This study investigates complication rates and effectiveness of ECD versus superficial parotidectomy (SP) for the treatment of primary benign parotid neoplasms. Study Design: Systematic literature review with meta-analysis. Methods: Studies available for inclusion evaluated the complications and effectiveness of ECD and SP as surgical techniques for the treatment of solitary, benign parotid tumors. An Ovid/Medline search revealed nine articles that met inclusion criteria. A critical review and meta-analysis of these articles was performed. Results: The included studies evaluated a total of 1,882 patients. There was no observed difference in tumor recurrence between the ECD and SP groups (odds ratio [OR], 0.557; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.271-1.147). There was a significantly lower rate of transient facial nerve paresis (OR, 0.256; 95% CI, 0.174-0.377) in the ECD group (59 of 741; 8.0%) compared to the SP group (81 of 397; 20.4%); however, there was no observed difference in permanent facial paralysis between the ECD and SP groups (OR, 0.878; 95% CI, 0.282-2.730). Frey's syndrome was less often observed (OR, 0.117; 95% CI, 0.071-0.191) after ECD (27 of 602; 4.5%) compared to SP (75 of 287; 26.1%). Conclusions: This systematic review with meta-analysis suggests that ECD has a similar recurrence rate as SP with fewer postoperative complications. ECD may be considered an alternative surgical modality for select benign parotid neoplasms.

AB - Objectives/Hypothesis: Recent studies suggest that extracapsular dissection (ECD) is an option for the resection of certain benign parotid tumors. This study investigates complication rates and effectiveness of ECD versus superficial parotidectomy (SP) for the treatment of primary benign parotid neoplasms. Study Design: Systematic literature review with meta-analysis. Methods: Studies available for inclusion evaluated the complications and effectiveness of ECD and SP as surgical techniques for the treatment of solitary, benign parotid tumors. An Ovid/Medline search revealed nine articles that met inclusion criteria. A critical review and meta-analysis of these articles was performed. Results: The included studies evaluated a total of 1,882 patients. There was no observed difference in tumor recurrence between the ECD and SP groups (odds ratio [OR], 0.557; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.271-1.147). There was a significantly lower rate of transient facial nerve paresis (OR, 0.256; 95% CI, 0.174-0.377) in the ECD group (59 of 741; 8.0%) compared to the SP group (81 of 397; 20.4%); however, there was no observed difference in permanent facial paralysis between the ECD and SP groups (OR, 0.878; 95% CI, 0.282-2.730). Frey's syndrome was less often observed (OR, 0.117; 95% CI, 0.071-0.191) after ECD (27 of 602; 4.5%) compared to SP (75 of 287; 26.1%). Conclusions: This systematic review with meta-analysis suggests that ECD has a similar recurrence rate as SP with fewer postoperative complications. ECD may be considered an alternative surgical modality for select benign parotid neoplasms.

KW - Parotid neoplasm

KW - extracapsular dissection

KW - parotid surgery

KW - parotid tumor

KW - parotidectomy

KW - superficial parotidectomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865660221&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865660221&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/lary.23396

DO - 10.1002/lary.23396

M3 - Article

C2 - 22753318

AN - SCOPUS:84865660221

VL - 122

SP - 1954

EP - 1960

JO - Laryngoscope

JF - Laryngoscope

SN - 0023-852X

IS - 9

ER -