Febrile and Infectious Morbidity After Laparotomy for Ectopic Pregnancy: Potential for Antibiotic Prophylaxis

Lawrence C Layman, Joseph S. Sanfilippo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Antibiotic prophylaxis has been used extensively for obstetric and gynecologic surgical procedures. However, it has not been evaluated for removal of an ectopic pregnancy. This retrospective pilot study was conducted to determine if significant infectious morbidity occurs after laparotomy for ectopic pregnancy to warrant a randomized, prospective trial of antibiotic prophylaxis. During a 1-year period, 42.9% of 49 women undergoing laparotomy for ectopic pregnancy had postoperative febrile morbidity, and 22.4% had postoperative infections requiring antibiotics. The groups with and without febrile morbidity were similar with respect to multiple parameters, including age, weight, medical and surgical history, laboratory data, and operative time. Patients with febrile morbidity were more commonly smokers (p < 0.05) and had greater estimated blood loss (p < 0.05) at surgery. The patients with postoperative febrile morbidity had a significantly increased mean hospital stay (p < 0.05) compared with those who were afebrile, 6.29 ± 0.40 days vs 4.89 ± 0.17 days, respectively. The subgroup of patients with postoperative infections accounted for this increase in hospital stay. We conclude that there is significant postoperative morbidity following laparotomy for ectopic pregnancy. Although smoking and increased blood loss appear to be associated factors, whether or not they are causal remains to be determined by a prospective, randomized, controlled study. (J GYNECOL SURG 6:161, 1990)

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)161-167
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Gynecologic Surgery
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1990

Fingerprint

Antibiotic Prophylaxis
Ectopic Pregnancy
Laparotomy
Fever
Morbidity
Length of Stay
Obstetric Surgical Procedures
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures
Operative Time
Infection
Retrospective Studies
Smoking
History
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Weights and Measures

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Febrile and Infectious Morbidity After Laparotomy for Ectopic Pregnancy : Potential for Antibiotic Prophylaxis. / Layman, Lawrence C; Sanfilippo, Joseph S.

In: Journal of Gynecologic Surgery, Vol. 6, No. 3, 01.01.1990, p. 161-167.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3175a9f554194b11bc2c0f4033503afa,
title = "Febrile and Infectious Morbidity After Laparotomy for Ectopic Pregnancy: Potential for Antibiotic Prophylaxis",
abstract = "Antibiotic prophylaxis has been used extensively for obstetric and gynecologic surgical procedures. However, it has not been evaluated for removal of an ectopic pregnancy. This retrospective pilot study was conducted to determine if significant infectious morbidity occurs after laparotomy for ectopic pregnancy to warrant a randomized, prospective trial of antibiotic prophylaxis. During a 1-year period, 42.9{\%} of 49 women undergoing laparotomy for ectopic pregnancy had postoperative febrile morbidity, and 22.4{\%} had postoperative infections requiring antibiotics. The groups with and without febrile morbidity were similar with respect to multiple parameters, including age, weight, medical and surgical history, laboratory data, and operative time. Patients with febrile morbidity were more commonly smokers (p < 0.05) and had greater estimated blood loss (p < 0.05) at surgery. The patients with postoperative febrile morbidity had a significantly increased mean hospital stay (p < 0.05) compared with those who were afebrile, 6.29 ± 0.40 days vs 4.89 ± 0.17 days, respectively. The subgroup of patients with postoperative infections accounted for this increase in hospital stay. We conclude that there is significant postoperative morbidity following laparotomy for ectopic pregnancy. Although smoking and increased blood loss appear to be associated factors, whether or not they are causal remains to be determined by a prospective, randomized, controlled study. (J GYNECOL SURG 6:161, 1990)",
author = "Layman, {Lawrence C} and Sanfilippo, {Joseph S.}",
year = "1990",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/gyn.1990.6.161",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "161--167",
journal = "Journal of Gynecologic Surgery",
issn = "1042-4067",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Febrile and Infectious Morbidity After Laparotomy for Ectopic Pregnancy

T2 - Potential for Antibiotic Prophylaxis

AU - Layman, Lawrence C

AU - Sanfilippo, Joseph S.

PY - 1990/1/1

Y1 - 1990/1/1

N2 - Antibiotic prophylaxis has been used extensively for obstetric and gynecologic surgical procedures. However, it has not been evaluated for removal of an ectopic pregnancy. This retrospective pilot study was conducted to determine if significant infectious morbidity occurs after laparotomy for ectopic pregnancy to warrant a randomized, prospective trial of antibiotic prophylaxis. During a 1-year period, 42.9% of 49 women undergoing laparotomy for ectopic pregnancy had postoperative febrile morbidity, and 22.4% had postoperative infections requiring antibiotics. The groups with and without febrile morbidity were similar with respect to multiple parameters, including age, weight, medical and surgical history, laboratory data, and operative time. Patients with febrile morbidity were more commonly smokers (p < 0.05) and had greater estimated blood loss (p < 0.05) at surgery. The patients with postoperative febrile morbidity had a significantly increased mean hospital stay (p < 0.05) compared with those who were afebrile, 6.29 ± 0.40 days vs 4.89 ± 0.17 days, respectively. The subgroup of patients with postoperative infections accounted for this increase in hospital stay. We conclude that there is significant postoperative morbidity following laparotomy for ectopic pregnancy. Although smoking and increased blood loss appear to be associated factors, whether or not they are causal remains to be determined by a prospective, randomized, controlled study. (J GYNECOL SURG 6:161, 1990)

AB - Antibiotic prophylaxis has been used extensively for obstetric and gynecologic surgical procedures. However, it has not been evaluated for removal of an ectopic pregnancy. This retrospective pilot study was conducted to determine if significant infectious morbidity occurs after laparotomy for ectopic pregnancy to warrant a randomized, prospective trial of antibiotic prophylaxis. During a 1-year period, 42.9% of 49 women undergoing laparotomy for ectopic pregnancy had postoperative febrile morbidity, and 22.4% had postoperative infections requiring antibiotics. The groups with and without febrile morbidity were similar with respect to multiple parameters, including age, weight, medical and surgical history, laboratory data, and operative time. Patients with febrile morbidity were more commonly smokers (p < 0.05) and had greater estimated blood loss (p < 0.05) at surgery. The patients with postoperative febrile morbidity had a significantly increased mean hospital stay (p < 0.05) compared with those who were afebrile, 6.29 ± 0.40 days vs 4.89 ± 0.17 days, respectively. The subgroup of patients with postoperative infections accounted for this increase in hospital stay. We conclude that there is significant postoperative morbidity following laparotomy for ectopic pregnancy. Although smoking and increased blood loss appear to be associated factors, whether or not they are causal remains to be determined by a prospective, randomized, controlled study. (J GYNECOL SURG 6:161, 1990)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025222098&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025222098&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/gyn.1990.6.161

DO - 10.1089/gyn.1990.6.161

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0025222098

VL - 6

SP - 161

EP - 167

JO - Journal of Gynecologic Surgery

JF - Journal of Gynecologic Surgery

SN - 1042-4067

IS - 3

ER -