Fecal occult blood testing beliefs and practices of U.S. primary care physicians

Serious deviations from evidence-based recommendations

Marion R. Nadel, Zahava Berkowitz, Carrie N. Klabunde, Robert A. Smith, Steven Scott Coughlin, Mary C. White

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) is an important option for colorectal cancer screening that should be available in order to achieve high population screening coverage. However, results from a national survey of clinical practice in 1999-2000 indicated that many primary care physicians used inadequate methods to implement FOBT screening and follow-up. Objective: To determine whether methods to screen for fecal occult blood have improved, including the use of newer more sensitive stool tests. Design: Cross-sectional national survey of primary care physicians. Participants: Participants consisted of 1,134 primary care physicians who reported ordering or performing FOBT in the 2006-2007 National Survey of Primary Care Physicians' Recommendations and Practices for Cancer Screening. Main Measures: Self-reported data on details of FOBT implementation and follow-up of positive results. Results: Most physicians report using standard guaiac tests; higher sensitivity guaiac tests and immunochemical tests were reported by only 22.0% and 8.9%, respectively. In-office testing, that is, testing of a single specimen collected during a digital rectal examination in the office, is still widely used although inappropriate for screening: 24.9% of physicians report using only in-office tests and another 52.9% report using both in-office and home tests. Recommendations improved for follow-up after a positive test: fewer physicians recommend repeating the FOBT (17.8%) or using tests other than colonoscopy for the diagnostic work-up (6.6%). Only 44.3% of physicians who use home tests have reminder systems to ensure test completion and return. Conclusions: Many physicians continue to use inappropriate methods to screen for fecal occult blood. Intensified efforts to inform physicians of recommended technique and promote the use of tracking systems are needed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)833-839
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of General Internal Medicine
Volume25
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Occult Blood
Primary Care Physicians
Physicians
Guaiac
Early Detection of Cancer
Reminder Systems
Digital Rectal Examination
Colonoscopy
Colorectal Neoplasms
Cross-Sectional Studies
Population

Keywords

  • cancer screening
  • colorectal cancer
  • fecal occult blood test
  • primary care
  • quality of care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Fecal occult blood testing beliefs and practices of U.S. primary care physicians : Serious deviations from evidence-based recommendations. / Nadel, Marion R.; Berkowitz, Zahava; Klabunde, Carrie N.; Smith, Robert A.; Coughlin, Steven Scott; White, Mary C.

In: Journal of General Internal Medicine, Vol. 25, No. 8, 01.08.2010, p. 833-839.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nadel, Marion R. ; Berkowitz, Zahava ; Klabunde, Carrie N. ; Smith, Robert A. ; Coughlin, Steven Scott ; White, Mary C. / Fecal occult blood testing beliefs and practices of U.S. primary care physicians : Serious deviations from evidence-based recommendations. In: Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2010 ; Vol. 25, No. 8. pp. 833-839.
@article{0d7583bc861b466485aebfb6257b7856,
title = "Fecal occult blood testing beliefs and practices of U.S. primary care physicians: Serious deviations from evidence-based recommendations",
abstract = "Background: Fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) is an important option for colorectal cancer screening that should be available in order to achieve high population screening coverage. However, results from a national survey of clinical practice in 1999-2000 indicated that many primary care physicians used inadequate methods to implement FOBT screening and follow-up. Objective: To determine whether methods to screen for fecal occult blood have improved, including the use of newer more sensitive stool tests. Design: Cross-sectional national survey of primary care physicians. Participants: Participants consisted of 1,134 primary care physicians who reported ordering or performing FOBT in the 2006-2007 National Survey of Primary Care Physicians' Recommendations and Practices for Cancer Screening. Main Measures: Self-reported data on details of FOBT implementation and follow-up of positive results. Results: Most physicians report using standard guaiac tests; higher sensitivity guaiac tests and immunochemical tests were reported by only 22.0{\%} and 8.9{\%}, respectively. In-office testing, that is, testing of a single specimen collected during a digital rectal examination in the office, is still widely used although inappropriate for screening: 24.9{\%} of physicians report using only in-office tests and another 52.9{\%} report using both in-office and home tests. Recommendations improved for follow-up after a positive test: fewer physicians recommend repeating the FOBT (17.8{\%}) or using tests other than colonoscopy for the diagnostic work-up (6.6{\%}). Only 44.3{\%} of physicians who use home tests have reminder systems to ensure test completion and return. Conclusions: Many physicians continue to use inappropriate methods to screen for fecal occult blood. Intensified efforts to inform physicians of recommended technique and promote the use of tracking systems are needed.",
keywords = "cancer screening, colorectal cancer, fecal occult blood test, primary care, quality of care",
author = "Nadel, {Marion R.} and Zahava Berkowitz and Klabunde, {Carrie N.} and Smith, {Robert A.} and Coughlin, {Steven Scott} and White, {Mary C.}",
year = "2010",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11606-010-1328-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "833--839",
journal = "Journal of General Internal Medicine",
issn = "0884-8734",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fecal occult blood testing beliefs and practices of U.S. primary care physicians

T2 - Serious deviations from evidence-based recommendations

AU - Nadel, Marion R.

AU - Berkowitz, Zahava

AU - Klabunde, Carrie N.

AU - Smith, Robert A.

AU - Coughlin, Steven Scott

AU - White, Mary C.

PY - 2010/8/1

Y1 - 2010/8/1

N2 - Background: Fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) is an important option for colorectal cancer screening that should be available in order to achieve high population screening coverage. However, results from a national survey of clinical practice in 1999-2000 indicated that many primary care physicians used inadequate methods to implement FOBT screening and follow-up. Objective: To determine whether methods to screen for fecal occult blood have improved, including the use of newer more sensitive stool tests. Design: Cross-sectional national survey of primary care physicians. Participants: Participants consisted of 1,134 primary care physicians who reported ordering or performing FOBT in the 2006-2007 National Survey of Primary Care Physicians' Recommendations and Practices for Cancer Screening. Main Measures: Self-reported data on details of FOBT implementation and follow-up of positive results. Results: Most physicians report using standard guaiac tests; higher sensitivity guaiac tests and immunochemical tests were reported by only 22.0% and 8.9%, respectively. In-office testing, that is, testing of a single specimen collected during a digital rectal examination in the office, is still widely used although inappropriate for screening: 24.9% of physicians report using only in-office tests and another 52.9% report using both in-office and home tests. Recommendations improved for follow-up after a positive test: fewer physicians recommend repeating the FOBT (17.8%) or using tests other than colonoscopy for the diagnostic work-up (6.6%). Only 44.3% of physicians who use home tests have reminder systems to ensure test completion and return. Conclusions: Many physicians continue to use inappropriate methods to screen for fecal occult blood. Intensified efforts to inform physicians of recommended technique and promote the use of tracking systems are needed.

AB - Background: Fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) is an important option for colorectal cancer screening that should be available in order to achieve high population screening coverage. However, results from a national survey of clinical practice in 1999-2000 indicated that many primary care physicians used inadequate methods to implement FOBT screening and follow-up. Objective: To determine whether methods to screen for fecal occult blood have improved, including the use of newer more sensitive stool tests. Design: Cross-sectional national survey of primary care physicians. Participants: Participants consisted of 1,134 primary care physicians who reported ordering or performing FOBT in the 2006-2007 National Survey of Primary Care Physicians' Recommendations and Practices for Cancer Screening. Main Measures: Self-reported data on details of FOBT implementation and follow-up of positive results. Results: Most physicians report using standard guaiac tests; higher sensitivity guaiac tests and immunochemical tests were reported by only 22.0% and 8.9%, respectively. In-office testing, that is, testing of a single specimen collected during a digital rectal examination in the office, is still widely used although inappropriate for screening: 24.9% of physicians report using only in-office tests and another 52.9% report using both in-office and home tests. Recommendations improved for follow-up after a positive test: fewer physicians recommend repeating the FOBT (17.8%) or using tests other than colonoscopy for the diagnostic work-up (6.6%). Only 44.3% of physicians who use home tests have reminder systems to ensure test completion and return. Conclusions: Many physicians continue to use inappropriate methods to screen for fecal occult blood. Intensified efforts to inform physicians of recommended technique and promote the use of tracking systems are needed.

KW - cancer screening

KW - colorectal cancer

KW - fecal occult blood test

KW - primary care

KW - quality of care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954423297&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954423297&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11606-010-1328-7

DO - 10.1007/s11606-010-1328-7

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 833

EP - 839

JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine

SN - 0884-8734

IS - 8

ER -