For Whom Does It Work? Moderators of the Effects of Written Emotional Disclosure in a Randomized Trial among Women with Chronic Pelvic Pain

Sally A. Norman, Mark A. Lumley, John A. Dooley, Michael P. Diamond

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

119 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Although written emotional disclosure has potential as a stress management intervention for people with health problems, the main (group) effects of disclosure in medical populations are limited. This study sought to identify individual difference moderators of the effects of written disclosure among women with chronic pelvic pain. Methods: In a prospective, randomized trial, 48 women with chronic pelvic pain completed 3 individual difference measures and then wrote for 3 days about stressful consequences of their pain (disclosure) or positive events (control). Health status was assessed at baseline and 2 months after writing. Results: Main effect group comparisons indicated that disclosure writing resulted in significantly lower evaluative pain intensity ratings than control writing at follow-up, but there were no main effects on other outcome variables (sensory or affective pain, disability, affect). Three baseline individual difference measures, however, significantly moderated group effects. Compared with control writing, disclosure led to less disability among women with higher baseline ambivalence over emotional expression or higher catastrophizing, and to increased positive affect among women with higher baseline negative affect. Ambivalence, but not catastrophizing, was independent of negative affect in its moderation effect. Conclusion: Although the main effects of writing about the stress of pelvic pain are limited, women with higher baseline ambivalence about emotional expression or negative affect appear to respond more positively to this intervention.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)174-183
Number of pages10
JournalPsychosomatic Medicine
Volume66
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pelvic Pain
Disclosure
Chronic Pain
Individuality
Catastrophization
Pain
Health Status
Health
Population

Keywords

  • Ambivalence
  • Disclosure
  • Expressive writing
  • Moderator
  • Negative affect
  • Pelvic pain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

For Whom Does It Work? Moderators of the Effects of Written Emotional Disclosure in a Randomized Trial among Women with Chronic Pelvic Pain. / Norman, Sally A.; Lumley, Mark A.; Dooley, John A.; Diamond, Michael P.

In: Psychosomatic Medicine, Vol. 66, No. 2, 01.03.2004, p. 174-183.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{15c3c610757f41c584cfc28c459bf5b2,
title = "For Whom Does It Work? Moderators of the Effects of Written Emotional Disclosure in a Randomized Trial among Women with Chronic Pelvic Pain",
abstract = "Objective: Although written emotional disclosure has potential as a stress management intervention for people with health problems, the main (group) effects of disclosure in medical populations are limited. This study sought to identify individual difference moderators of the effects of written disclosure among women with chronic pelvic pain. Methods: In a prospective, randomized trial, 48 women with chronic pelvic pain completed 3 individual difference measures and then wrote for 3 days about stressful consequences of their pain (disclosure) or positive events (control). Health status was assessed at baseline and 2 months after writing. Results: Main effect group comparisons indicated that disclosure writing resulted in significantly lower evaluative pain intensity ratings than control writing at follow-up, but there were no main effects on other outcome variables (sensory or affective pain, disability, affect). Three baseline individual difference measures, however, significantly moderated group effects. Compared with control writing, disclosure led to less disability among women with higher baseline ambivalence over emotional expression or higher catastrophizing, and to increased positive affect among women with higher baseline negative affect. Ambivalence, but not catastrophizing, was independent of negative affect in its moderation effect. Conclusion: Although the main effects of writing about the stress of pelvic pain are limited, women with higher baseline ambivalence about emotional expression or negative affect appear to respond more positively to this intervention.",
keywords = "Ambivalence, Disclosure, Expressive writing, Moderator, Negative affect, Pelvic pain",
author = "Norman, {Sally A.} and Lumley, {Mark A.} and Dooley, {John A.} and Diamond, {Michael P.}",
year = "2004",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/01.psy.0000116979.77753.74",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "66",
pages = "174--183",
journal = "Psychosomatic Medicine",
issn = "0033-3174",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - For Whom Does It Work? Moderators of the Effects of Written Emotional Disclosure in a Randomized Trial among Women with Chronic Pelvic Pain

AU - Norman, Sally A.

AU - Lumley, Mark A.

AU - Dooley, John A.

AU - Diamond, Michael P.

PY - 2004/3/1

Y1 - 2004/3/1

N2 - Objective: Although written emotional disclosure has potential as a stress management intervention for people with health problems, the main (group) effects of disclosure in medical populations are limited. This study sought to identify individual difference moderators of the effects of written disclosure among women with chronic pelvic pain. Methods: In a prospective, randomized trial, 48 women with chronic pelvic pain completed 3 individual difference measures and then wrote for 3 days about stressful consequences of their pain (disclosure) or positive events (control). Health status was assessed at baseline and 2 months after writing. Results: Main effect group comparisons indicated that disclosure writing resulted in significantly lower evaluative pain intensity ratings than control writing at follow-up, but there were no main effects on other outcome variables (sensory or affective pain, disability, affect). Three baseline individual difference measures, however, significantly moderated group effects. Compared with control writing, disclosure led to less disability among women with higher baseline ambivalence over emotional expression or higher catastrophizing, and to increased positive affect among women with higher baseline negative affect. Ambivalence, but not catastrophizing, was independent of negative affect in its moderation effect. Conclusion: Although the main effects of writing about the stress of pelvic pain are limited, women with higher baseline ambivalence about emotional expression or negative affect appear to respond more positively to this intervention.

AB - Objective: Although written emotional disclosure has potential as a stress management intervention for people with health problems, the main (group) effects of disclosure in medical populations are limited. This study sought to identify individual difference moderators of the effects of written disclosure among women with chronic pelvic pain. Methods: In a prospective, randomized trial, 48 women with chronic pelvic pain completed 3 individual difference measures and then wrote for 3 days about stressful consequences of their pain (disclosure) or positive events (control). Health status was assessed at baseline and 2 months after writing. Results: Main effect group comparisons indicated that disclosure writing resulted in significantly lower evaluative pain intensity ratings than control writing at follow-up, but there were no main effects on other outcome variables (sensory or affective pain, disability, affect). Three baseline individual difference measures, however, significantly moderated group effects. Compared with control writing, disclosure led to less disability among women with higher baseline ambivalence over emotional expression or higher catastrophizing, and to increased positive affect among women with higher baseline negative affect. Ambivalence, but not catastrophizing, was independent of negative affect in its moderation effect. Conclusion: Although the main effects of writing about the stress of pelvic pain are limited, women with higher baseline ambivalence about emotional expression or negative affect appear to respond more positively to this intervention.

KW - Ambivalence

KW - Disclosure

KW - Expressive writing

KW - Moderator

KW - Negative affect

KW - Pelvic pain

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1642276699&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1642276699&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.psy.0000116979.77753.74

DO - 10.1097/01.psy.0000116979.77753.74

M3 - Article

C2 - 15039501

AN - SCOPUS:1642276699

VL - 66

SP - 174

EP - 183

JO - Psychosomatic Medicine

JF - Psychosomatic Medicine

SN - 0033-3174

IS - 2

ER -