From the eye of the nurses: 360-degree evaluation of residents

Dotun Ogunyemi, Gustavo Gonzalez, Alex Fong, Carolyn Alexander, David Finke, Tyrone Donnon, Ricardo Azziz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Evaluations from the health care team can provide feedback useful in guiding residents' professional growth. We describe the significance of 360-degree evaluation of residents by the nursing staff. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 1642 nurses' anonymous evaluations on 26 residents from 2004 to 2007 was performed. Nurses' evaluations of residents on communication with patients, interactions with peers, and professionalism were compared to faculty evaluations and standard medical examination scores. Data were analyzed with the use of the chi-square test, the t test, analyses of variance (ANOVAs), and Spearman's correlation. A P value of <.05 was considered significant. Results: Strong correlations were noted between nursing evaluation categories (r = 0.74-0.80, P <.001), whereas weak correlations occurred between nursing and faculty evaluations (r = 0.065-0.119, P <.001). There were weak negative correlations between nursing evaluations and standard medical examination scores (r = -0.08 to -0.10, P <.001). Specific graduating resident classes, the obstetrical rotation, and senior or male residents were significantly associated with negative nursing evaluations. Discussion: Nursing staff can assess residents on the competencies of interpersonal and communication skills and professionalism. These evaluations provide different perceptions of residents' behavior, which can be useful for formative feedback in residents' development.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)105-110
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions
Volume29
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2009

Fingerprint

nurse
resident
evaluation
nursing
medical examination
nursing staff
communication skills
health care
communication
interaction
Values

Keywords

  • Continuing
  • Core competencies
  • Education
  • Graduate
  • Medical
  • Nurse's assessments
  • Three hundred sixty-degree evaluation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Ogunyemi, D., Gonzalez, G., Fong, A., Alexander, C., Finke, D., Donnon, T., & Azziz, R. (2009). From the eye of the nurses: 360-degree evaluation of residents. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 29(2), 105-110. https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.20019

From the eye of the nurses : 360-degree evaluation of residents. / Ogunyemi, Dotun; Gonzalez, Gustavo; Fong, Alex; Alexander, Carolyn; Finke, David; Donnon, Tyrone; Azziz, Ricardo.

In: Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, Vol. 29, No. 2, 01.12.2009, p. 105-110.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ogunyemi, D, Gonzalez, G, Fong, A, Alexander, C, Finke, D, Donnon, T & Azziz, R 2009, 'From the eye of the nurses: 360-degree evaluation of residents', Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 105-110. https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.20019
Ogunyemi, Dotun ; Gonzalez, Gustavo ; Fong, Alex ; Alexander, Carolyn ; Finke, David ; Donnon, Tyrone ; Azziz, Ricardo. / From the eye of the nurses : 360-degree evaluation of residents. In: Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions. 2009 ; Vol. 29, No. 2. pp. 105-110.
@article{9f76db77fb5d4d97a760dcce1ff96d5e,
title = "From the eye of the nurses: 360-degree evaluation of residents",
abstract = "Introduction: Evaluations from the health care team can provide feedback useful in guiding residents' professional growth. We describe the significance of 360-degree evaluation of residents by the nursing staff. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 1642 nurses' anonymous evaluations on 26 residents from 2004 to 2007 was performed. Nurses' evaluations of residents on communication with patients, interactions with peers, and professionalism were compared to faculty evaluations and standard medical examination scores. Data were analyzed with the use of the chi-square test, the t test, analyses of variance (ANOVAs), and Spearman's correlation. A P value of <.05 was considered significant. Results: Strong correlations were noted between nursing evaluation categories (r = 0.74-0.80, P <.001), whereas weak correlations occurred between nursing and faculty evaluations (r = 0.065-0.119, P <.001). There were weak negative correlations between nursing evaluations and standard medical examination scores (r = -0.08 to -0.10, P <.001). Specific graduating resident classes, the obstetrical rotation, and senior or male residents were significantly associated with negative nursing evaluations. Discussion: Nursing staff can assess residents on the competencies of interpersonal and communication skills and professionalism. These evaluations provide different perceptions of residents' behavior, which can be useful for formative feedback in residents' development.",
keywords = "Continuing, Core competencies, Education, Graduate, Medical, Nurse's assessments, Three hundred sixty-degree evaluation",
author = "Dotun Ogunyemi and Gustavo Gonzalez and Alex Fong and Carolyn Alexander and David Finke and Tyrone Donnon and Ricardo Azziz",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/chp.20019",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "105--110",
journal = "Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions",
issn = "0894-1912",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - From the eye of the nurses

T2 - 360-degree evaluation of residents

AU - Ogunyemi, Dotun

AU - Gonzalez, Gustavo

AU - Fong, Alex

AU - Alexander, Carolyn

AU - Finke, David

AU - Donnon, Tyrone

AU - Azziz, Ricardo

PY - 2009/12/1

Y1 - 2009/12/1

N2 - Introduction: Evaluations from the health care team can provide feedback useful in guiding residents' professional growth. We describe the significance of 360-degree evaluation of residents by the nursing staff. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 1642 nurses' anonymous evaluations on 26 residents from 2004 to 2007 was performed. Nurses' evaluations of residents on communication with patients, interactions with peers, and professionalism were compared to faculty evaluations and standard medical examination scores. Data were analyzed with the use of the chi-square test, the t test, analyses of variance (ANOVAs), and Spearman's correlation. A P value of <.05 was considered significant. Results: Strong correlations were noted between nursing evaluation categories (r = 0.74-0.80, P <.001), whereas weak correlations occurred between nursing and faculty evaluations (r = 0.065-0.119, P <.001). There were weak negative correlations between nursing evaluations and standard medical examination scores (r = -0.08 to -0.10, P <.001). Specific graduating resident classes, the obstetrical rotation, and senior or male residents were significantly associated with negative nursing evaluations. Discussion: Nursing staff can assess residents on the competencies of interpersonal and communication skills and professionalism. These evaluations provide different perceptions of residents' behavior, which can be useful for formative feedback in residents' development.

AB - Introduction: Evaluations from the health care team can provide feedback useful in guiding residents' professional growth. We describe the significance of 360-degree evaluation of residents by the nursing staff. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 1642 nurses' anonymous evaluations on 26 residents from 2004 to 2007 was performed. Nurses' evaluations of residents on communication with patients, interactions with peers, and professionalism were compared to faculty evaluations and standard medical examination scores. Data were analyzed with the use of the chi-square test, the t test, analyses of variance (ANOVAs), and Spearman's correlation. A P value of <.05 was considered significant. Results: Strong correlations were noted between nursing evaluation categories (r = 0.74-0.80, P <.001), whereas weak correlations occurred between nursing and faculty evaluations (r = 0.065-0.119, P <.001). There were weak negative correlations between nursing evaluations and standard medical examination scores (r = -0.08 to -0.10, P <.001). Specific graduating resident classes, the obstetrical rotation, and senior or male residents were significantly associated with negative nursing evaluations. Discussion: Nursing staff can assess residents on the competencies of interpersonal and communication skills and professionalism. These evaluations provide different perceptions of residents' behavior, which can be useful for formative feedback in residents' development.

KW - Continuing

KW - Core competencies

KW - Education

KW - Graduate

KW - Medical

KW - Nurse's assessments

KW - Three hundred sixty-degree evaluation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349566485&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70349566485&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/chp.20019

DO - 10.1002/chp.20019

M3 - Article

C2 - 19530193

AN - SCOPUS:70349566485

VL - 29

SP - 105

EP - 110

JO - Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions

JF - Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions

SN - 0894-1912

IS - 2

ER -