Games economists play

A survey of non-computerized classroom-games for college economics

Jurgen Brauer, Greg Delemeester

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The bulk of this unusual paper consists of an extensive online annotated compilation of 113 non-computerized classroom-games, most of which can be played within one class period, to assist in the teaching of college-level basic micro and macroeconomic concepts (see http://www.aug.edu/-shajmb or http://www.marietta.edu/-delemeeg). The paper itself consists of three major sections. The first catalogues, summarizes, and provides sample annotations of the games we collected. Section two makes a number of observations about the games. For instance, we notice an imbalance between games for microeconomics (many) and games for macroeconomics (few). We also detail which standard introductory economics topics are covered well and which are not covered well or missing altogether. For example, we observe that few games exist to present the proper economic role of government in economic affairs. The third section surveys the available literature on the costs and benefits of playing games in the classroom. In particular, our survey reveals that existing studies consider costs and benefits to students and instructors only partially, and we lay out a matrix that should help in the design of improved studies on the efficacy of gaming in the classroom.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)221-236
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Economic Surveys
Volume15
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001

Fingerprint

Economists
Economics
Classroom games
Costs and benefits
Macroeconomics
Imbalance
Introductory economics
Role of government
Layout
Annotation
Gaming
Efficacy
Microeconomics

Keywords

  • Classroom
  • Games
  • Non-computerized
  • Pedagogy
  • Teaching

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Games economists play : A survey of non-computerized classroom-games for college economics. / Brauer, Jurgen; Delemeester, Greg.

In: Journal of Economic Surveys, Vol. 15, No. 2, 01.01.2001, p. 221-236.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brauer, Jurgen ; Delemeester, Greg. / Games economists play : A survey of non-computerized classroom-games for college economics. In: Journal of Economic Surveys. 2001 ; Vol. 15, No. 2. pp. 221-236.
@article{99b28921c176463d8e80f07c4769e08b,
title = "Games economists play: A survey of non-computerized classroom-games for college economics",
abstract = "The bulk of this unusual paper consists of an extensive online annotated compilation of 113 non-computerized classroom-games, most of which can be played within one class period, to assist in the teaching of college-level basic micro and macroeconomic concepts (see http://www.aug.edu/-shajmb or http://www.marietta.edu/-delemeeg). The paper itself consists of three major sections. The first catalogues, summarizes, and provides sample annotations of the games we collected. Section two makes a number of observations about the games. For instance, we notice an imbalance between games for microeconomics (many) and games for macroeconomics (few). We also detail which standard introductory economics topics are covered well and which are not covered well or missing altogether. For example, we observe that few games exist to present the proper economic role of government in economic affairs. The third section surveys the available literature on the costs and benefits of playing games in the classroom. In particular, our survey reveals that existing studies consider costs and benefits to students and instructors only partially, and we lay out a matrix that should help in the design of improved studies on the efficacy of gaming in the classroom.",
keywords = "Classroom, Games, Non-computerized, Pedagogy, Teaching",
author = "Jurgen Brauer and Greg Delemeester",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1467-6419.00137",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "221--236",
journal = "Journal of Economic Surveys",
issn = "0950-0804",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Games economists play

T2 - A survey of non-computerized classroom-games for college economics

AU - Brauer, Jurgen

AU - Delemeester, Greg

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - The bulk of this unusual paper consists of an extensive online annotated compilation of 113 non-computerized classroom-games, most of which can be played within one class period, to assist in the teaching of college-level basic micro and macroeconomic concepts (see http://www.aug.edu/-shajmb or http://www.marietta.edu/-delemeeg). The paper itself consists of three major sections. The first catalogues, summarizes, and provides sample annotations of the games we collected. Section two makes a number of observations about the games. For instance, we notice an imbalance between games for microeconomics (many) and games for macroeconomics (few). We also detail which standard introductory economics topics are covered well and which are not covered well or missing altogether. For example, we observe that few games exist to present the proper economic role of government in economic affairs. The third section surveys the available literature on the costs and benefits of playing games in the classroom. In particular, our survey reveals that existing studies consider costs and benefits to students and instructors only partially, and we lay out a matrix that should help in the design of improved studies on the efficacy of gaming in the classroom.

AB - The bulk of this unusual paper consists of an extensive online annotated compilation of 113 non-computerized classroom-games, most of which can be played within one class period, to assist in the teaching of college-level basic micro and macroeconomic concepts (see http://www.aug.edu/-shajmb or http://www.marietta.edu/-delemeeg). The paper itself consists of three major sections. The first catalogues, summarizes, and provides sample annotations of the games we collected. Section two makes a number of observations about the games. For instance, we notice an imbalance between games for microeconomics (many) and games for macroeconomics (few). We also detail which standard introductory economics topics are covered well and which are not covered well or missing altogether. For example, we observe that few games exist to present the proper economic role of government in economic affairs. The third section surveys the available literature on the costs and benefits of playing games in the classroom. In particular, our survey reveals that existing studies consider costs and benefits to students and instructors only partially, and we lay out a matrix that should help in the design of improved studies on the efficacy of gaming in the classroom.

KW - Classroom

KW - Games

KW - Non-computerized

KW - Pedagogy

KW - Teaching

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035004788&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035004788&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1467-6419.00137

DO - 10.1111/1467-6419.00137

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 221

EP - 236

JO - Journal of Economic Surveys

JF - Journal of Economic Surveys

SN - 0950-0804

IS - 2

ER -