Gut access in critically ill and injured patients: Where have we gone thus far?

N. Kulvatunyou, B. Joseph, A. Tang, Terence OKeeffe, J. L. Wynne, R. S. Friese, R. Latifi, P. Rhee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Nutritional support in critically ill and injured patients is crucial. It can be provided via parenteral or enteral access, each of which has advantages and disadvantages. In this article, we review enteral support, particularly gut access. Methods: We conducted a literature review. Results: A number of techniques enable access to the gastrointestinal tract in critically ill and injured patients. A temporary orogastric (OG), nasogastric (NG), or nasojejunal (NJ) feeding tube can be placed. But the prevalent technique is the more permanent percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), which has economic as well as safety benefits. Other techniques include open operative gastrostomy, laparoscopic or laparoscopic-as-sisted gastrostomy, and jejunostomy. Conclusions: Nutritional support should be provided enterally, via gut access whenever possible. The issue of pre- versus post-pyloric access remains controversial. PEG is safe and economical for long-term access.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)24-29
Number of pages6
JournalEuropean Surgery - Acta Chirurgica Austriaca
Volume43
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Gastrostomy
Critical Illness
Nutritional Support
Small Intestine
Jejunostomy
Enteral Nutrition
Gastrointestinal Tract
Economics
Safety

Keywords

  • Feeding tube
  • Nasogastric tube
  • Nasojejunostomy
  • Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Gut access in critically ill and injured patients : Where have we gone thus far? / Kulvatunyou, N.; Joseph, B.; Tang, A.; OKeeffe, Terence; Wynne, J. L.; Friese, R. S.; Latifi, R.; Rhee, P.

In: European Surgery - Acta Chirurgica Austriaca, Vol. 43, No. 1, 01.02.2011, p. 24-29.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kulvatunyou, N, Joseph, B, Tang, A, OKeeffe, T, Wynne, JL, Friese, RS, Latifi, R & Rhee, P 2011, 'Gut access in critically ill and injured patients: Where have we gone thus far?', European Surgery - Acta Chirurgica Austriaca, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 24-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-011-0590-1
Kulvatunyou, N. ; Joseph, B. ; Tang, A. ; OKeeffe, Terence ; Wynne, J. L. ; Friese, R. S. ; Latifi, R. ; Rhee, P. / Gut access in critically ill and injured patients : Where have we gone thus far?. In: European Surgery - Acta Chirurgica Austriaca. 2011 ; Vol. 43, No. 1. pp. 24-29.
@article{958eb01a123847a1a10f56a26f862a7f,
title = "Gut access in critically ill and injured patients: Where have we gone thus far?",
abstract = "Background: Nutritional support in critically ill and injured patients is crucial. It can be provided via parenteral or enteral access, each of which has advantages and disadvantages. In this article, we review enteral support, particularly gut access. Methods: We conducted a literature review. Results: A number of techniques enable access to the gastrointestinal tract in critically ill and injured patients. A temporary orogastric (OG), nasogastric (NG), or nasojejunal (NJ) feeding tube can be placed. But the prevalent technique is the more permanent percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), which has economic as well as safety benefits. Other techniques include open operative gastrostomy, laparoscopic or laparoscopic-as-sisted gastrostomy, and jejunostomy. Conclusions: Nutritional support should be provided enterally, via gut access whenever possible. The issue of pre- versus post-pyloric access remains controversial. PEG is safe and economical for long-term access.",
keywords = "Feeding tube, Nasogastric tube, Nasojejunostomy, Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy",
author = "N. Kulvatunyou and B. Joseph and A. Tang and Terence OKeeffe and Wynne, {J. L.} and Friese, {R. S.} and R. Latifi and P. Rhee",
year = "2011",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10353-011-0590-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "24--29",
journal = "European Surgery - Acta Chirurgica Austriaca",
issn = "0001-544X",
publisher = "Springer Wien",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gut access in critically ill and injured patients

T2 - Where have we gone thus far?

AU - Kulvatunyou, N.

AU - Joseph, B.

AU - Tang, A.

AU - OKeeffe, Terence

AU - Wynne, J. L.

AU - Friese, R. S.

AU - Latifi, R.

AU - Rhee, P.

PY - 2011/2/1

Y1 - 2011/2/1

N2 - Background: Nutritional support in critically ill and injured patients is crucial. It can be provided via parenteral or enteral access, each of which has advantages and disadvantages. In this article, we review enteral support, particularly gut access. Methods: We conducted a literature review. Results: A number of techniques enable access to the gastrointestinal tract in critically ill and injured patients. A temporary orogastric (OG), nasogastric (NG), or nasojejunal (NJ) feeding tube can be placed. But the prevalent technique is the more permanent percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), which has economic as well as safety benefits. Other techniques include open operative gastrostomy, laparoscopic or laparoscopic-as-sisted gastrostomy, and jejunostomy. Conclusions: Nutritional support should be provided enterally, via gut access whenever possible. The issue of pre- versus post-pyloric access remains controversial. PEG is safe and economical for long-term access.

AB - Background: Nutritional support in critically ill and injured patients is crucial. It can be provided via parenteral or enteral access, each of which has advantages and disadvantages. In this article, we review enteral support, particularly gut access. Methods: We conducted a literature review. Results: A number of techniques enable access to the gastrointestinal tract in critically ill and injured patients. A temporary orogastric (OG), nasogastric (NG), or nasojejunal (NJ) feeding tube can be placed. But the prevalent technique is the more permanent percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), which has economic as well as safety benefits. Other techniques include open operative gastrostomy, laparoscopic or laparoscopic-as-sisted gastrostomy, and jejunostomy. Conclusions: Nutritional support should be provided enterally, via gut access whenever possible. The issue of pre- versus post-pyloric access remains controversial. PEG is safe and economical for long-term access.

KW - Feeding tube

KW - Nasogastric tube

KW - Nasojejunostomy

KW - Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79958103459&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79958103459&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10353-011-0590-1

DO - 10.1007/s10353-011-0590-1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79958103459

VL - 43

SP - 24

EP - 29

JO - European Surgery - Acta Chirurgica Austriaca

JF - European Surgery - Acta Chirurgica Austriaca

SN - 0001-544X

IS - 1

ER -