Hardship Among Older Adults in the HRS: Exploring Measurement Differences Across Socio-Demographic Characteristics

Reginald D. Tucker-Seeley, Gillian Marshall, Frances Margaret Yang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Measures of hardship have been proffered as better indicators of economic well-being than traditional measures of socioeconomic status (SES). However, there is a dearth of research on latent factor structures and measurement bias in items assessing hardship across socio-demographic characteristics, especially among older adults. As such, the purpose of this study was to determine the factor structure of items measuring hardship in the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) and to determine measurement bias across socio-demographic groups (i.e., race/ethnicity, gender, and age). The participants were HRS subjects who completed an additional psychosocial survey (N = 3074). The results revealed a single latent factor for hardship (comparative fit index = 0.99, root mean square error of approximation = 0.02) using confirmatory factor analysis on eight items in the HRS. The multiple indicator, multiple causes (MIMIC) model was used to determine measurement bias in the items due to socio-demographic characteristics. Compared to white respondents, black respondents were more likely to endorse items of financial dissatisfaction (Odds Ratio (OR) = 2.19, 95 % Confidence Interval (CI) = 1.43, 3.35), while Latino respondents were more likely to endorse food insecurity (OR = 2.78, 95 % CI = 1.60, 4.83); and older individuals (age 65 and older) were less likely to endorse having moved to a worse residence/neighborhood (OR = 0.32, CI = 0.18, 0.57) and being unemployed (OR = 0.28, CI = 0.20, 0.38). These results indicate that there is differential item functioning for specific measures of hardship suggesting that there are differences observed for the measurement of hardship for these items across racial/ethnic and age groups.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)222-230
Number of pages9
JournalRace and Social Problems
Volume8
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2016

Fingerprint

retirement
confidence
health
trend
nutrition situation
age group
social status
factor analysis
ethnic group
ethnicity
well-being
cause
gender
economics
Group

Keywords

  • Hardship
  • Measurement
  • Older adults
  • Socioeconomic status

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anthropology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Hardship Among Older Adults in the HRS : Exploring Measurement Differences Across Socio-Demographic Characteristics. / Tucker-Seeley, Reginald D.; Marshall, Gillian; Yang, Frances Margaret.

In: Race and Social Problems, Vol. 8, No. 3, 01.09.2016, p. 222-230.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tucker-Seeley, Reginald D. ; Marshall, Gillian ; Yang, Frances Margaret. / Hardship Among Older Adults in the HRS : Exploring Measurement Differences Across Socio-Demographic Characteristics. In: Race and Social Problems. 2016 ; Vol. 8, No. 3. pp. 222-230.
@article{de80357c93fe47a68cee09a5bbd4c54d,
title = "Hardship Among Older Adults in the HRS: Exploring Measurement Differences Across Socio-Demographic Characteristics",
abstract = "Measures of hardship have been proffered as better indicators of economic well-being than traditional measures of socioeconomic status (SES). However, there is a dearth of research on latent factor structures and measurement bias in items assessing hardship across socio-demographic characteristics, especially among older adults. As such, the purpose of this study was to determine the factor structure of items measuring hardship in the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) and to determine measurement bias across socio-demographic groups (i.e., race/ethnicity, gender, and age). The participants were HRS subjects who completed an additional psychosocial survey (N = 3074). The results revealed a single latent factor for hardship (comparative fit index = 0.99, root mean square error of approximation = 0.02) using confirmatory factor analysis on eight items in the HRS. The multiple indicator, multiple causes (MIMIC) model was used to determine measurement bias in the items due to socio-demographic characteristics. Compared to white respondents, black respondents were more likely to endorse items of financial dissatisfaction (Odds Ratio (OR) = 2.19, 95 {\%} Confidence Interval (CI) = 1.43, 3.35), while Latino respondents were more likely to endorse food insecurity (OR = 2.78, 95 {\%} CI = 1.60, 4.83); and older individuals (age 65 and older) were less likely to endorse having moved to a worse residence/neighborhood (OR = 0.32, CI = 0.18, 0.57) and being unemployed (OR = 0.28, CI = 0.20, 0.38). These results indicate that there is differential item functioning for specific measures of hardship suggesting that there are differences observed for the measurement of hardship for these items across racial/ethnic and age groups.",
keywords = "Hardship, Measurement, Older adults, Socioeconomic status",
author = "Tucker-Seeley, {Reginald D.} and Gillian Marshall and Yang, {Frances Margaret}",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s12552-016-9180-y",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "222--230",
journal = "Race and Social Problems",
issn = "1867-1756",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hardship Among Older Adults in the HRS

T2 - Exploring Measurement Differences Across Socio-Demographic Characteristics

AU - Tucker-Seeley, Reginald D.

AU - Marshall, Gillian

AU - Yang, Frances Margaret

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - Measures of hardship have been proffered as better indicators of economic well-being than traditional measures of socioeconomic status (SES). However, there is a dearth of research on latent factor structures and measurement bias in items assessing hardship across socio-demographic characteristics, especially among older adults. As such, the purpose of this study was to determine the factor structure of items measuring hardship in the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) and to determine measurement bias across socio-demographic groups (i.e., race/ethnicity, gender, and age). The participants were HRS subjects who completed an additional psychosocial survey (N = 3074). The results revealed a single latent factor for hardship (comparative fit index = 0.99, root mean square error of approximation = 0.02) using confirmatory factor analysis on eight items in the HRS. The multiple indicator, multiple causes (MIMIC) model was used to determine measurement bias in the items due to socio-demographic characteristics. Compared to white respondents, black respondents were more likely to endorse items of financial dissatisfaction (Odds Ratio (OR) = 2.19, 95 % Confidence Interval (CI) = 1.43, 3.35), while Latino respondents were more likely to endorse food insecurity (OR = 2.78, 95 % CI = 1.60, 4.83); and older individuals (age 65 and older) were less likely to endorse having moved to a worse residence/neighborhood (OR = 0.32, CI = 0.18, 0.57) and being unemployed (OR = 0.28, CI = 0.20, 0.38). These results indicate that there is differential item functioning for specific measures of hardship suggesting that there are differences observed for the measurement of hardship for these items across racial/ethnic and age groups.

AB - Measures of hardship have been proffered as better indicators of economic well-being than traditional measures of socioeconomic status (SES). However, there is a dearth of research on latent factor structures and measurement bias in items assessing hardship across socio-demographic characteristics, especially among older adults. As such, the purpose of this study was to determine the factor structure of items measuring hardship in the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) and to determine measurement bias across socio-demographic groups (i.e., race/ethnicity, gender, and age). The participants were HRS subjects who completed an additional psychosocial survey (N = 3074). The results revealed a single latent factor for hardship (comparative fit index = 0.99, root mean square error of approximation = 0.02) using confirmatory factor analysis on eight items in the HRS. The multiple indicator, multiple causes (MIMIC) model was used to determine measurement bias in the items due to socio-demographic characteristics. Compared to white respondents, black respondents were more likely to endorse items of financial dissatisfaction (Odds Ratio (OR) = 2.19, 95 % Confidence Interval (CI) = 1.43, 3.35), while Latino respondents were more likely to endorse food insecurity (OR = 2.78, 95 % CI = 1.60, 4.83); and older individuals (age 65 and older) were less likely to endorse having moved to a worse residence/neighborhood (OR = 0.32, CI = 0.18, 0.57) and being unemployed (OR = 0.28, CI = 0.20, 0.38). These results indicate that there is differential item functioning for specific measures of hardship suggesting that there are differences observed for the measurement of hardship for these items across racial/ethnic and age groups.

KW - Hardship

KW - Measurement

KW - Older adults

KW - Socioeconomic status

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84984914545&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84984914545&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12552-016-9180-y

DO - 10.1007/s12552-016-9180-y

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84984914545

VL - 8

SP - 222

EP - 230

JO - Race and Social Problems

JF - Race and Social Problems

SN - 1867-1756

IS - 3

ER -