Harmonic Scalpel versus cold knife dissection in superficial parotidectomy

D. Russ Blankenship, Christine G. Gourin, Edward A. Porubsky, Edward S. Porubsky, Frederick N. Klippert, Elizabeth G. Whitaker, David J Terris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Use of the Harmonic Scalpel has recently been described in thyroid surgery, in which it appears to result in decreased operative time and blood loss without increasing the incidence of nerve injury when compared to conventional techniques of vessel ligation and tissue division. We sought to determine whether the use of the Harmonic Scalpel in superficial parotidectomy was associated with a difference in operative time, blood loss, or facial nerve injury compared with conventional techniques. The medical records of all patients who underwent superficial parotidectomy for benign parotid pathology at the Medical College of Georgia and Veterans Affairs Hospital of Augusta, Georgia, from 1999 to 2002 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were excluded if they had a history of a bleeding disorder, prior facial nerve weakness, prior parotid surgery, malignant pathology, or required total parotidectomy. Forty-two patients were eligible for inclusion. Nineteen patients underwent Harmonic Scalpel parotidectomy (HS) and 21 patients underwent conventional parotidectomy (control group). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups with respect to demographic data, pathology, or tumor size. Use of the Harmonic Scalpel was associated with a significant reduction in length of surgery (167.5 ± 42.6 min vs. 195.5 ± 37.4 min for controls, P = 0.03) and intraoperative blood loss (37.5 ± 25.8 mL vs. 60.0 ± 37.1 mL for controls, P = 0.03). There were no significant differences between the HS or control groups with respect to postoperative drain output (48.7 ± 33.8 mL vs. 48.0 ± 22.9 mL, respectively, P ± 0.05) or facial nerve function. Use of the Harmonic Scalpel for superficial parotidectomy is safe and may result in reduced operative time and blood loss compared with conventional techniques. A safe alternative to cold knife superficial parotidectomy is presented with the potential benefits of reduced operative time and blood loss demonstrated.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)397-400
Number of pages4
JournalOtolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Volume131
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2004

Fingerprint

Dissection
Operative Time
Pathology
Facial Nerve Diseases
Facial Nerve Injuries
Veterans Hospitals
Control Groups
Facial Nerve
Medical Records
Ligation
Thyroid Gland
Demography
Hemorrhage
Incidence
Wounds and Injuries
Neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Blankenship, D. R., Gourin, C. G., Porubsky, E. A., Porubsky, E. S., Klippert, F. N., Whitaker, E. G., & Terris, D. J. (2004). Harmonic Scalpel versus cold knife dissection in superficial parotidectomy. Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 131(4), 397-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2004.03.043

Harmonic Scalpel versus cold knife dissection in superficial parotidectomy. / Blankenship, D. Russ; Gourin, Christine G.; Porubsky, Edward A.; Porubsky, Edward S.; Klippert, Frederick N.; Whitaker, Elizabeth G.; Terris, David J.

In: Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Vol. 131, No. 4, 01.10.2004, p. 397-400.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Blankenship, DR, Gourin, CG, Porubsky, EA, Porubsky, ES, Klippert, FN, Whitaker, EG & Terris, DJ 2004, 'Harmonic Scalpel versus cold knife dissection in superficial parotidectomy', Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, vol. 131, no. 4, pp. 397-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2004.03.043
Blankenship DR, Gourin CG, Porubsky EA, Porubsky ES, Klippert FN, Whitaker EG et al. Harmonic Scalpel versus cold knife dissection in superficial parotidectomy. Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. 2004 Oct 1;131(4):397-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2004.03.043
Blankenship, D. Russ ; Gourin, Christine G. ; Porubsky, Edward A. ; Porubsky, Edward S. ; Klippert, Frederick N. ; Whitaker, Elizabeth G. ; Terris, David J. / Harmonic Scalpel versus cold knife dissection in superficial parotidectomy. In: Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. 2004 ; Vol. 131, No. 4. pp. 397-400.
@article{30ea54206ce04645ab633a704041cefb,
title = "Harmonic Scalpel versus cold knife dissection in superficial parotidectomy",
abstract = "Use of the Harmonic Scalpel has recently been described in thyroid surgery, in which it appears to result in decreased operative time and blood loss without increasing the incidence of nerve injury when compared to conventional techniques of vessel ligation and tissue division. We sought to determine whether the use of the Harmonic Scalpel in superficial parotidectomy was associated with a difference in operative time, blood loss, or facial nerve injury compared with conventional techniques. The medical records of all patients who underwent superficial parotidectomy for benign parotid pathology at the Medical College of Georgia and Veterans Affairs Hospital of Augusta, Georgia, from 1999 to 2002 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were excluded if they had a history of a bleeding disorder, prior facial nerve weakness, prior parotid surgery, malignant pathology, or required total parotidectomy. Forty-two patients were eligible for inclusion. Nineteen patients underwent Harmonic Scalpel parotidectomy (HS) and 21 patients underwent conventional parotidectomy (control group). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups with respect to demographic data, pathology, or tumor size. Use of the Harmonic Scalpel was associated with a significant reduction in length of surgery (167.5 ± 42.6 min vs. 195.5 ± 37.4 min for controls, P = 0.03) and intraoperative blood loss (37.5 ± 25.8 mL vs. 60.0 ± 37.1 mL for controls, P = 0.03). There were no significant differences between the HS or control groups with respect to postoperative drain output (48.7 ± 33.8 mL vs. 48.0 ± 22.9 mL, respectively, P ± 0.05) or facial nerve function. Use of the Harmonic Scalpel for superficial parotidectomy is safe and may result in reduced operative time and blood loss compared with conventional techniques. A safe alternative to cold knife superficial parotidectomy is presented with the potential benefits of reduced operative time and blood loss demonstrated.",
author = "Blankenship, {D. Russ} and Gourin, {Christine G.} and Porubsky, {Edward A.} and Porubsky, {Edward S.} and Klippert, {Frederick N.} and Whitaker, {Elizabeth G.} and Terris, {David J}",
year = "2004",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.otohns.2004.03.043",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "131",
pages = "397--400",
journal = "Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)",
issn = "0194-5998",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Harmonic Scalpel versus cold knife dissection in superficial parotidectomy

AU - Blankenship, D. Russ

AU - Gourin, Christine G.

AU - Porubsky, Edward A.

AU - Porubsky, Edward S.

AU - Klippert, Frederick N.

AU - Whitaker, Elizabeth G.

AU - Terris, David J

PY - 2004/10/1

Y1 - 2004/10/1

N2 - Use of the Harmonic Scalpel has recently been described in thyroid surgery, in which it appears to result in decreased operative time and blood loss without increasing the incidence of nerve injury when compared to conventional techniques of vessel ligation and tissue division. We sought to determine whether the use of the Harmonic Scalpel in superficial parotidectomy was associated with a difference in operative time, blood loss, or facial nerve injury compared with conventional techniques. The medical records of all patients who underwent superficial parotidectomy for benign parotid pathology at the Medical College of Georgia and Veterans Affairs Hospital of Augusta, Georgia, from 1999 to 2002 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were excluded if they had a history of a bleeding disorder, prior facial nerve weakness, prior parotid surgery, malignant pathology, or required total parotidectomy. Forty-two patients were eligible for inclusion. Nineteen patients underwent Harmonic Scalpel parotidectomy (HS) and 21 patients underwent conventional parotidectomy (control group). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups with respect to demographic data, pathology, or tumor size. Use of the Harmonic Scalpel was associated with a significant reduction in length of surgery (167.5 ± 42.6 min vs. 195.5 ± 37.4 min for controls, P = 0.03) and intraoperative blood loss (37.5 ± 25.8 mL vs. 60.0 ± 37.1 mL for controls, P = 0.03). There were no significant differences between the HS or control groups with respect to postoperative drain output (48.7 ± 33.8 mL vs. 48.0 ± 22.9 mL, respectively, P ± 0.05) or facial nerve function. Use of the Harmonic Scalpel for superficial parotidectomy is safe and may result in reduced operative time and blood loss compared with conventional techniques. A safe alternative to cold knife superficial parotidectomy is presented with the potential benefits of reduced operative time and blood loss demonstrated.

AB - Use of the Harmonic Scalpel has recently been described in thyroid surgery, in which it appears to result in decreased operative time and blood loss without increasing the incidence of nerve injury when compared to conventional techniques of vessel ligation and tissue division. We sought to determine whether the use of the Harmonic Scalpel in superficial parotidectomy was associated with a difference in operative time, blood loss, or facial nerve injury compared with conventional techniques. The medical records of all patients who underwent superficial parotidectomy for benign parotid pathology at the Medical College of Georgia and Veterans Affairs Hospital of Augusta, Georgia, from 1999 to 2002 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were excluded if they had a history of a bleeding disorder, prior facial nerve weakness, prior parotid surgery, malignant pathology, or required total parotidectomy. Forty-two patients were eligible for inclusion. Nineteen patients underwent Harmonic Scalpel parotidectomy (HS) and 21 patients underwent conventional parotidectomy (control group). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups with respect to demographic data, pathology, or tumor size. Use of the Harmonic Scalpel was associated with a significant reduction in length of surgery (167.5 ± 42.6 min vs. 195.5 ± 37.4 min for controls, P = 0.03) and intraoperative blood loss (37.5 ± 25.8 mL vs. 60.0 ± 37.1 mL for controls, P = 0.03). There were no significant differences between the HS or control groups with respect to postoperative drain output (48.7 ± 33.8 mL vs. 48.0 ± 22.9 mL, respectively, P ± 0.05) or facial nerve function. Use of the Harmonic Scalpel for superficial parotidectomy is safe and may result in reduced operative time and blood loss compared with conventional techniques. A safe alternative to cold knife superficial parotidectomy is presented with the potential benefits of reduced operative time and blood loss demonstrated.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4644273209&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4644273209&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.otohns.2004.03.043

DO - 10.1016/j.otohns.2004.03.043

M3 - Article

VL - 131

SP - 397

EP - 400

JO - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)

JF - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)

SN - 0194-5998

IS - 4

ER -