Hebbian learning and the development of direction selectivity

The role of geniculate response timings

J. C. Feidler, Alan B Saul, A. Murthy, A. L. Humphrey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Zero-sum Hebbian learning rules that reinforce well correlated inputs have been used by others to model the competitive self-organization of afferents from the lateral geniculate nucleus to produce orientation selectivity and ocular dominance columns. However, the application of these simple Hebbian rules to the development of direction selectivity (DS) is problematic because the best correlated inputs are those that are well correlated in both the preferred and nonpreferred directions of motion. Such afferents would combine to produce non-DS cortical units. Afferents that are in spatiotemporal quadrature would combine to produce DS cortical units, but are poorly correlated in the nonpreferred direction. In this paper, the development of DS is reduced to the problem of associating a pair of units in spatiotemporal quadrature in the face of competition from a third, non-quadrature unit. As expected, simple Hebbian learning rules perform poorly at associating the quadrature pair. However, two additional Hebb-type learning rules, postsynaptic gating and BCM (Bienenstock, Cooper and Munro), improve performance. Results from this three-input model are shown to generalize to a larger network. We conclude that learning rules in which the postsynaptic response determines the magnitude and/or direction of synaptic change perform better than simple Hebbian rules at establishing direction selectivity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)195-214
Number of pages20
JournalNetwork: Computation in Neural Systems
Volume8
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Learning
ocular Dominance
Geniculate Bodies
Direction compound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Hebbian learning and the development of direction selectivity : The role of geniculate response timings. / Feidler, J. C.; Saul, Alan B; Murthy, A.; Humphrey, A. L.

In: Network: Computation in Neural Systems, Vol. 8, No. 2, 01.01.1997, p. 195-214.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{116b08057f854c98a9e88c669e7af232,
title = "Hebbian learning and the development of direction selectivity: The role of geniculate response timings",
abstract = "Zero-sum Hebbian learning rules that reinforce well correlated inputs have been used by others to model the competitive self-organization of afferents from the lateral geniculate nucleus to produce orientation selectivity and ocular dominance columns. However, the application of these simple Hebbian rules to the development of direction selectivity (DS) is problematic because the best correlated inputs are those that are well correlated in both the preferred and nonpreferred directions of motion. Such afferents would combine to produce non-DS cortical units. Afferents that are in spatiotemporal quadrature would combine to produce DS cortical units, but are poorly correlated in the nonpreferred direction. In this paper, the development of DS is reduced to the problem of associating a pair of units in spatiotemporal quadrature in the face of competition from a third, non-quadrature unit. As expected, simple Hebbian learning rules perform poorly at associating the quadrature pair. However, two additional Hebb-type learning rules, postsynaptic gating and BCM (Bienenstock, Cooper and Munro), improve performance. Results from this three-input model are shown to generalize to a larger network. We conclude that learning rules in which the postsynaptic response determines the magnitude and/or direction of synaptic change perform better than simple Hebbian rules at establishing direction selectivity.",
author = "Feidler, {J. C.} and Saul, {Alan B} and A. Murthy and Humphrey, {A. L.}",
year = "1997",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1088/0954-898X_8_2_006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "195--214",
journal = "Network: Computation in Neural Systems",
issn = "0954-898X",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hebbian learning and the development of direction selectivity

T2 - The role of geniculate response timings

AU - Feidler, J. C.

AU - Saul, Alan B

AU - Murthy, A.

AU - Humphrey, A. L.

PY - 1997/1/1

Y1 - 1997/1/1

N2 - Zero-sum Hebbian learning rules that reinforce well correlated inputs have been used by others to model the competitive self-organization of afferents from the lateral geniculate nucleus to produce orientation selectivity and ocular dominance columns. However, the application of these simple Hebbian rules to the development of direction selectivity (DS) is problematic because the best correlated inputs are those that are well correlated in both the preferred and nonpreferred directions of motion. Such afferents would combine to produce non-DS cortical units. Afferents that are in spatiotemporal quadrature would combine to produce DS cortical units, but are poorly correlated in the nonpreferred direction. In this paper, the development of DS is reduced to the problem of associating a pair of units in spatiotemporal quadrature in the face of competition from a third, non-quadrature unit. As expected, simple Hebbian learning rules perform poorly at associating the quadrature pair. However, two additional Hebb-type learning rules, postsynaptic gating and BCM (Bienenstock, Cooper and Munro), improve performance. Results from this three-input model are shown to generalize to a larger network. We conclude that learning rules in which the postsynaptic response determines the magnitude and/or direction of synaptic change perform better than simple Hebbian rules at establishing direction selectivity.

AB - Zero-sum Hebbian learning rules that reinforce well correlated inputs have been used by others to model the competitive self-organization of afferents from the lateral geniculate nucleus to produce orientation selectivity and ocular dominance columns. However, the application of these simple Hebbian rules to the development of direction selectivity (DS) is problematic because the best correlated inputs are those that are well correlated in both the preferred and nonpreferred directions of motion. Such afferents would combine to produce non-DS cortical units. Afferents that are in spatiotemporal quadrature would combine to produce DS cortical units, but are poorly correlated in the nonpreferred direction. In this paper, the development of DS is reduced to the problem of associating a pair of units in spatiotemporal quadrature in the face of competition from a third, non-quadrature unit. As expected, simple Hebbian learning rules perform poorly at associating the quadrature pair. However, two additional Hebb-type learning rules, postsynaptic gating and BCM (Bienenstock, Cooper and Munro), improve performance. Results from this three-input model are shown to generalize to a larger network. We conclude that learning rules in which the postsynaptic response determines the magnitude and/or direction of synaptic change perform better than simple Hebbian rules at establishing direction selectivity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0000395428&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0000395428&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1088/0954-898X_8_2_006

DO - 10.1088/0954-898X_8_2_006

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 195

EP - 214

JO - Network: Computation in Neural Systems

JF - Network: Computation in Neural Systems

SN - 0954-898X

IS - 2

ER -