Histologic evaluation of canal and isthmus debridement efficacies of two different irrigant delivery techniques in a closed system

Jeffrey M. Adcock, Stephanie Jane Sidow, Stephen Warwick Looney, Yan Liu, Kathleen McNally, Kimberly Lindsey, Franklin Chi Meng Tay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: This study compared canal and isthmus debridement efficacies between side-vented needle irrigation (SNI) and continuous ultrasonic irrigation (CUI) in the mesial root of mandibular first molars with narrow isthmuses using a closed-canal design. Methods: Micro-computed tomography scanning was used to select 20 teeth, each containing a narrow isthmus. Each root was sealed at the apex; embedded in polyvinylsiloxane to simulate a closed-canal system; and instrumented to size 40, 0.04 taper. Final irrigation was performed with either SNI or CUI (N = 10). Masson trichrome-stained sections were prepared from demineralized roots at 10 canal levels between 1.0 and 2.8 mm from the anatomic apex. The areas and debris occupied by the canals and isthmus were measured using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) and statistically analyzed using repeated-measures analysis. Results: Overall, a significant difference was identified between SNI and CUI in the amount of debris remaining in the isthmus (P = .006) but not in the canal (P = .940). There was significantly more debris in the most apical three canal levels (1.0-1.4 mm) regardless of the irrigation technique (P < .001). The isthmus harbored significantly less debris in the CUI group between isthmus levels 1.0 to 2.2 mm when compared with SNI (P < .001 and P = .029). Neither technique removes debris completely from the canal or isthmuses. Conclusions: Compared with SNI, CUI removes significantly more debris from narrow isthmuses of mandibular mesial roots.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)544-548
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Endodontics
Volume37
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2011

Fingerprint

Debridement
Ultrasonics
Needles
National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Tooth
Software
Tomography

Keywords

  • Canal
  • closed system
  • continuous ultrasonic irrigation
  • debris
  • isthmus
  • side-vented needle irrigation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Histologic evaluation of canal and isthmus debridement efficacies of two different irrigant delivery techniques in a closed system. / Adcock, Jeffrey M.; Sidow, Stephanie Jane; Looney, Stephen Warwick; Liu, Yan; McNally, Kathleen; Lindsey, Kimberly; Tay, Franklin Chi Meng.

In: Journal of Endodontics, Vol. 37, No. 4, 01.04.2011, p. 544-548.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6f59c068775b482ea9b20c21d099dedc,
title = "Histologic evaluation of canal and isthmus debridement efficacies of two different irrigant delivery techniques in a closed system",
abstract = "Introduction: This study compared canal and isthmus debridement efficacies between side-vented needle irrigation (SNI) and continuous ultrasonic irrigation (CUI) in the mesial root of mandibular first molars with narrow isthmuses using a closed-canal design. Methods: Micro-computed tomography scanning was used to select 20 teeth, each containing a narrow isthmus. Each root was sealed at the apex; embedded in polyvinylsiloxane to simulate a closed-canal system; and instrumented to size 40, 0.04 taper. Final irrigation was performed with either SNI or CUI (N = 10). Masson trichrome-stained sections were prepared from demineralized roots at 10 canal levels between 1.0 and 2.8 mm from the anatomic apex. The areas and debris occupied by the canals and isthmus were measured using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) and statistically analyzed using repeated-measures analysis. Results: Overall, a significant difference was identified between SNI and CUI in the amount of debris remaining in the isthmus (P = .006) but not in the canal (P = .940). There was significantly more debris in the most apical three canal levels (1.0-1.4 mm) regardless of the irrigation technique (P < .001). The isthmus harbored significantly less debris in the CUI group between isthmus levels 1.0 to 2.2 mm when compared with SNI (P < .001 and P = .029). Neither technique removes debris completely from the canal or isthmuses. Conclusions: Compared with SNI, CUI removes significantly more debris from narrow isthmuses of mandibular mesial roots.",
keywords = "Canal, closed system, continuous ultrasonic irrigation, debris, isthmus, side-vented needle irrigation",
author = "Adcock, {Jeffrey M.} and Sidow, {Stephanie Jane} and Looney, {Stephen Warwick} and Yan Liu and Kathleen McNally and Kimberly Lindsey and Tay, {Franklin Chi Meng}",
year = "2011",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.joen.2011.01.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "544--548",
journal = "Journal of Endodontics",
issn = "0099-2399",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Histologic evaluation of canal and isthmus debridement efficacies of two different irrigant delivery techniques in a closed system

AU - Adcock, Jeffrey M.

AU - Sidow, Stephanie Jane

AU - Looney, Stephen Warwick

AU - Liu, Yan

AU - McNally, Kathleen

AU - Lindsey, Kimberly

AU - Tay, Franklin Chi Meng

PY - 2011/4/1

Y1 - 2011/4/1

N2 - Introduction: This study compared canal and isthmus debridement efficacies between side-vented needle irrigation (SNI) and continuous ultrasonic irrigation (CUI) in the mesial root of mandibular first molars with narrow isthmuses using a closed-canal design. Methods: Micro-computed tomography scanning was used to select 20 teeth, each containing a narrow isthmus. Each root was sealed at the apex; embedded in polyvinylsiloxane to simulate a closed-canal system; and instrumented to size 40, 0.04 taper. Final irrigation was performed with either SNI or CUI (N = 10). Masson trichrome-stained sections were prepared from demineralized roots at 10 canal levels between 1.0 and 2.8 mm from the anatomic apex. The areas and debris occupied by the canals and isthmus were measured using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) and statistically analyzed using repeated-measures analysis. Results: Overall, a significant difference was identified between SNI and CUI in the amount of debris remaining in the isthmus (P = .006) but not in the canal (P = .940). There was significantly more debris in the most apical three canal levels (1.0-1.4 mm) regardless of the irrigation technique (P < .001). The isthmus harbored significantly less debris in the CUI group between isthmus levels 1.0 to 2.2 mm when compared with SNI (P < .001 and P = .029). Neither technique removes debris completely from the canal or isthmuses. Conclusions: Compared with SNI, CUI removes significantly more debris from narrow isthmuses of mandibular mesial roots.

AB - Introduction: This study compared canal and isthmus debridement efficacies between side-vented needle irrigation (SNI) and continuous ultrasonic irrigation (CUI) in the mesial root of mandibular first molars with narrow isthmuses using a closed-canal design. Methods: Micro-computed tomography scanning was used to select 20 teeth, each containing a narrow isthmus. Each root was sealed at the apex; embedded in polyvinylsiloxane to simulate a closed-canal system; and instrumented to size 40, 0.04 taper. Final irrigation was performed with either SNI or CUI (N = 10). Masson trichrome-stained sections were prepared from demineralized roots at 10 canal levels between 1.0 and 2.8 mm from the anatomic apex. The areas and debris occupied by the canals and isthmus were measured using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) and statistically analyzed using repeated-measures analysis. Results: Overall, a significant difference was identified between SNI and CUI in the amount of debris remaining in the isthmus (P = .006) but not in the canal (P = .940). There was significantly more debris in the most apical three canal levels (1.0-1.4 mm) regardless of the irrigation technique (P < .001). The isthmus harbored significantly less debris in the CUI group between isthmus levels 1.0 to 2.2 mm when compared with SNI (P < .001 and P = .029). Neither technique removes debris completely from the canal or isthmuses. Conclusions: Compared with SNI, CUI removes significantly more debris from narrow isthmuses of mandibular mesial roots.

KW - Canal

KW - closed system

KW - continuous ultrasonic irrigation

KW - debris

KW - isthmus

KW - side-vented needle irrigation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952782087&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952782087&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.joen.2011.01.006

DO - 10.1016/j.joen.2011.01.006

M3 - Article

C2 - 21419306

AN - SCOPUS:79952782087

VL - 37

SP - 544

EP - 548

JO - Journal of Endodontics

JF - Journal of Endodontics

SN - 0099-2399

IS - 4

ER -