Histological and biomechanical evaluation of phosphorylcholine-coated titanium implants

Cristiano Susin, Mohammed Qahash, Jan Hall, Lars Sennerby, Ulf M E Wikesjö

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Compounds considered for drug delivery from oral implant surfaces in support of local bone formation might themselves influence osseointegration. Phosphorylcholine (PC) polymers have been shown to enhance the biocompatibility of medical devices and to serve as drug delivery systems. The objective of this study was to evaluate local bone formation and osseointegration at PC and positively charged PC (PC+)-coated endosseous implants in an established rabbit model. Material and Methods: Sixteen adult female New Zealand White rabbits were used. Eight animals received PC-coated and control titanium porous oxide surface implants placed in the left and right distal femural condyle (trabecular bone) and proximal tibial metaphysis (cortical bone) using aseptic routines. The remaining eight animals similarly received PC+ and control implants. One implant was placed in each femural condyle and two implants in each tibial metaphysis. Experimental and control implants were alternated between the left and right hind legs. Fascia and skin were closed in layers. The animals were euthanized following a 6-week healing interval for biomechanical (removal torque) and histometric analyses. Results: Peri-implant bone density was considerably greater at tibial compared with femoral sites within as well as immediately outside the implant threads. However, there were no significant differences in bone density among PC, PC+, and control implants. Nevertheless, bone-implant contact was significantly lower at PC compared with PC+ and control implants in cortical bone (p<0.05). Numerical differences in trabecular bone did not reach statistical significance. The removal torque evaluation revealed significantly lower values for PC compared with PC+ and control sites (p<0.05). Conclusion: The histometric and biomechanical analyses suggest that PC coating may influence biological processes and ultimately osseointegration of endosseous implants. Apparently, incorporation of cationic charges may reverse or compensate for this scenario. Nevertheless, both PC coatings exhibited clinically acceptable osseointegration. In perspective, PC technology appears to be a viable candidate delivery system for agents in support of local bone formation at endosseous implant surfaces.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)270-275
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Clinical Periodontology
Volume35
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2008

Fingerprint

Phosphorylcholine
Titanium
Osseointegration
Osteogenesis
Torque
Bone and Bones
Bone Density
Experimental Implants
Rabbits
Biological Phenomena
Fascia
Drug Delivery Systems
Thigh

Keywords

  • Osseointegration
  • Phosphorylcholine
  • Rabbit model
  • Tissue engineering
  • Titanium

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Histological and biomechanical evaluation of phosphorylcholine-coated titanium implants. / Susin, Cristiano; Qahash, Mohammed; Hall, Jan; Sennerby, Lars; Wikesjö, Ulf M E.

In: Journal of Clinical Periodontology, Vol. 35, No. 3, 01.03.2008, p. 270-275.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Susin, Cristiano ; Qahash, Mohammed ; Hall, Jan ; Sennerby, Lars ; Wikesjö, Ulf M E. / Histological and biomechanical evaluation of phosphorylcholine-coated titanium implants. In: Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2008 ; Vol. 35, No. 3. pp. 270-275.
@article{84c229a0551746cbbfb1292f73608462,
title = "Histological and biomechanical evaluation of phosphorylcholine-coated titanium implants",
abstract = "Objective: Compounds considered for drug delivery from oral implant surfaces in support of local bone formation might themselves influence osseointegration. Phosphorylcholine (PC) polymers have been shown to enhance the biocompatibility of medical devices and to serve as drug delivery systems. The objective of this study was to evaluate local bone formation and osseointegration at PC and positively charged PC (PC+)-coated endosseous implants in an established rabbit model. Material and Methods: Sixteen adult female New Zealand White rabbits were used. Eight animals received PC-coated and control titanium porous oxide surface implants placed in the left and right distal femural condyle (trabecular bone) and proximal tibial metaphysis (cortical bone) using aseptic routines. The remaining eight animals similarly received PC+ and control implants. One implant was placed in each femural condyle and two implants in each tibial metaphysis. Experimental and control implants were alternated between the left and right hind legs. Fascia and skin were closed in layers. The animals were euthanized following a 6-week healing interval for biomechanical (removal torque) and histometric analyses. Results: Peri-implant bone density was considerably greater at tibial compared with femoral sites within as well as immediately outside the implant threads. However, there were no significant differences in bone density among PC, PC+, and control implants. Nevertheless, bone-implant contact was significantly lower at PC compared with PC+ and control implants in cortical bone (p<0.05). Numerical differences in trabecular bone did not reach statistical significance. The removal torque evaluation revealed significantly lower values for PC compared with PC+ and control sites (p<0.05). Conclusion: The histometric and biomechanical analyses suggest that PC coating may influence biological processes and ultimately osseointegration of endosseous implants. Apparently, incorporation of cationic charges may reverse or compensate for this scenario. Nevertheless, both PC coatings exhibited clinically acceptable osseointegration. In perspective, PC technology appears to be a viable candidate delivery system for agents in support of local bone formation at endosseous implant surfaces.",
keywords = "Osseointegration, Phosphorylcholine, Rabbit model, Tissue engineering, Titanium",
author = "Cristiano Susin and Mohammed Qahash and Jan Hall and Lars Sennerby and Wikesj{\"o}, {Ulf M E}",
year = "2008",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01196.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "270--275",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Periodontology",
issn = "0303-6979",
publisher = "Blackwell Munksgaard",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Histological and biomechanical evaluation of phosphorylcholine-coated titanium implants

AU - Susin, Cristiano

AU - Qahash, Mohammed

AU - Hall, Jan

AU - Sennerby, Lars

AU - Wikesjö, Ulf M E

PY - 2008/3/1

Y1 - 2008/3/1

N2 - Objective: Compounds considered for drug delivery from oral implant surfaces in support of local bone formation might themselves influence osseointegration. Phosphorylcholine (PC) polymers have been shown to enhance the biocompatibility of medical devices and to serve as drug delivery systems. The objective of this study was to evaluate local bone formation and osseointegration at PC and positively charged PC (PC+)-coated endosseous implants in an established rabbit model. Material and Methods: Sixteen adult female New Zealand White rabbits were used. Eight animals received PC-coated and control titanium porous oxide surface implants placed in the left and right distal femural condyle (trabecular bone) and proximal tibial metaphysis (cortical bone) using aseptic routines. The remaining eight animals similarly received PC+ and control implants. One implant was placed in each femural condyle and two implants in each tibial metaphysis. Experimental and control implants were alternated between the left and right hind legs. Fascia and skin were closed in layers. The animals were euthanized following a 6-week healing interval for biomechanical (removal torque) and histometric analyses. Results: Peri-implant bone density was considerably greater at tibial compared with femoral sites within as well as immediately outside the implant threads. However, there were no significant differences in bone density among PC, PC+, and control implants. Nevertheless, bone-implant contact was significantly lower at PC compared with PC+ and control implants in cortical bone (p<0.05). Numerical differences in trabecular bone did not reach statistical significance. The removal torque evaluation revealed significantly lower values for PC compared with PC+ and control sites (p<0.05). Conclusion: The histometric and biomechanical analyses suggest that PC coating may influence biological processes and ultimately osseointegration of endosseous implants. Apparently, incorporation of cationic charges may reverse or compensate for this scenario. Nevertheless, both PC coatings exhibited clinically acceptable osseointegration. In perspective, PC technology appears to be a viable candidate delivery system for agents in support of local bone formation at endosseous implant surfaces.

AB - Objective: Compounds considered for drug delivery from oral implant surfaces in support of local bone formation might themselves influence osseointegration. Phosphorylcholine (PC) polymers have been shown to enhance the biocompatibility of medical devices and to serve as drug delivery systems. The objective of this study was to evaluate local bone formation and osseointegration at PC and positively charged PC (PC+)-coated endosseous implants in an established rabbit model. Material and Methods: Sixteen adult female New Zealand White rabbits were used. Eight animals received PC-coated and control titanium porous oxide surface implants placed in the left and right distal femural condyle (trabecular bone) and proximal tibial metaphysis (cortical bone) using aseptic routines. The remaining eight animals similarly received PC+ and control implants. One implant was placed in each femural condyle and two implants in each tibial metaphysis. Experimental and control implants were alternated between the left and right hind legs. Fascia and skin were closed in layers. The animals were euthanized following a 6-week healing interval for biomechanical (removal torque) and histometric analyses. Results: Peri-implant bone density was considerably greater at tibial compared with femoral sites within as well as immediately outside the implant threads. However, there were no significant differences in bone density among PC, PC+, and control implants. Nevertheless, bone-implant contact was significantly lower at PC compared with PC+ and control implants in cortical bone (p<0.05). Numerical differences in trabecular bone did not reach statistical significance. The removal torque evaluation revealed significantly lower values for PC compared with PC+ and control sites (p<0.05). Conclusion: The histometric and biomechanical analyses suggest that PC coating may influence biological processes and ultimately osseointegration of endosseous implants. Apparently, incorporation of cationic charges may reverse or compensate for this scenario. Nevertheless, both PC coatings exhibited clinically acceptable osseointegration. In perspective, PC technology appears to be a viable candidate delivery system for agents in support of local bone formation at endosseous implant surfaces.

KW - Osseointegration

KW - Phosphorylcholine

KW - Rabbit model

KW - Tissue engineering

KW - Titanium

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38849174437&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38849174437&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01196.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01196.x

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 270

EP - 275

JO - Journal of Clinical Periodontology

JF - Journal of Clinical Periodontology

SN - 0303-6979

IS - 3

ER -