Histomorphometric and histologic observations of bone healing around immediate implants in dogs

Gregory R. Parr, David E. Steflik, Allen L. Sisk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper reports histologic and histomorphometric results concerning bone healing around 13 pure titanium screw-shaped root-form implants that were placed in three mongrel dogs immediately after extraction of maxillary and mandibular premolars. Osseous healing around the implants showed a great deal of variability depending on the arch in which the implant was placed and on the original anatomy of the implant site. Implants placed in the mandible showed the greatest amount of bone apposition, with a mean total bone of 60.3%. Implants placed in the maxilla showed less bone and greater variability both visually and statistically, with a mean total bone of 46.3%. The values obtained for bone after 5 months of healing of the control sites were consistent with the values obtained for bone approximating the implants after the same time period. This was true for both arches. It was impossible to visually or statistically discriminate between sham surgical control sites and routine control sites or between implant sites and either of the control sites. Implant surgical procedures and implant placement seemed to have little effect on the tabulated values beyond tooth extraction alone. This research suggests that immediate implants have the potential for developing good bone apposition depending on the area of implantation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)534-540
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants
Volume8
Issue number5
StatePublished - Jan 1 1993
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dogs
Bone and Bones
Tooth Extraction
Bicuspid
Maxilla
Titanium
Mandible
Anatomy
Research

Keywords

  • Animal
  • Bone
  • Dog
  • Endosseous implant
  • Extraction
  • Healing
  • Histology
  • Histomorphometry
  • Morphometry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Histomorphometric and histologic observations of bone healing around immediate implants in dogs. / Parr, Gregory R.; Steflik, David E.; Sisk, Allen L.

In: International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, Vol. 8, No. 5, 01.01.1993, p. 534-540.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{84a2642bbcea420b86fd7f00ef942b94,
title = "Histomorphometric and histologic observations of bone healing around immediate implants in dogs",
abstract = "This paper reports histologic and histomorphometric results concerning bone healing around 13 pure titanium screw-shaped root-form implants that were placed in three mongrel dogs immediately after extraction of maxillary and mandibular premolars. Osseous healing around the implants showed a great deal of variability depending on the arch in which the implant was placed and on the original anatomy of the implant site. Implants placed in the mandible showed the greatest amount of bone apposition, with a mean total bone of 60.3{\%}. Implants placed in the maxilla showed less bone and greater variability both visually and statistically, with a mean total bone of 46.3{\%}. The values obtained for bone after 5 months of healing of the control sites were consistent with the values obtained for bone approximating the implants after the same time period. This was true for both arches. It was impossible to visually or statistically discriminate between sham surgical control sites and routine control sites or between implant sites and either of the control sites. Implant surgical procedures and implant placement seemed to have little effect on the tabulated values beyond tooth extraction alone. This research suggests that immediate implants have the potential for developing good bone apposition depending on the area of implantation.",
keywords = "Animal, Bone, Dog, Endosseous implant, Extraction, Healing, Histology, Histomorphometry, Morphometry",
author = "Parr, {Gregory R.} and Steflik, {David E.} and Sisk, {Allen L.}",
year = "1993",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "534--540",
journal = "The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants",
issn = "0882-2786",
publisher = "Quintessence Publishing Company",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Histomorphometric and histologic observations of bone healing around immediate implants in dogs

AU - Parr, Gregory R.

AU - Steflik, David E.

AU - Sisk, Allen L.

PY - 1993/1/1

Y1 - 1993/1/1

N2 - This paper reports histologic and histomorphometric results concerning bone healing around 13 pure titanium screw-shaped root-form implants that were placed in three mongrel dogs immediately after extraction of maxillary and mandibular premolars. Osseous healing around the implants showed a great deal of variability depending on the arch in which the implant was placed and on the original anatomy of the implant site. Implants placed in the mandible showed the greatest amount of bone apposition, with a mean total bone of 60.3%. Implants placed in the maxilla showed less bone and greater variability both visually and statistically, with a mean total bone of 46.3%. The values obtained for bone after 5 months of healing of the control sites were consistent with the values obtained for bone approximating the implants after the same time period. This was true for both arches. It was impossible to visually or statistically discriminate between sham surgical control sites and routine control sites or between implant sites and either of the control sites. Implant surgical procedures and implant placement seemed to have little effect on the tabulated values beyond tooth extraction alone. This research suggests that immediate implants have the potential for developing good bone apposition depending on the area of implantation.

AB - This paper reports histologic and histomorphometric results concerning bone healing around 13 pure titanium screw-shaped root-form implants that were placed in three mongrel dogs immediately after extraction of maxillary and mandibular premolars. Osseous healing around the implants showed a great deal of variability depending on the arch in which the implant was placed and on the original anatomy of the implant site. Implants placed in the mandible showed the greatest amount of bone apposition, with a mean total bone of 60.3%. Implants placed in the maxilla showed less bone and greater variability both visually and statistically, with a mean total bone of 46.3%. The values obtained for bone after 5 months of healing of the control sites were consistent with the values obtained for bone approximating the implants after the same time period. This was true for both arches. It was impossible to visually or statistically discriminate between sham surgical control sites and routine control sites or between implant sites and either of the control sites. Implant surgical procedures and implant placement seemed to have little effect on the tabulated values beyond tooth extraction alone. This research suggests that immediate implants have the potential for developing good bone apposition depending on the area of implantation.

KW - Animal

KW - Bone

KW - Dog

KW - Endosseous implant

KW - Extraction

KW - Healing

KW - Histology

KW - Histomorphometry

KW - Morphometry

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027758101&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027758101&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 534

EP - 540

JO - The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants

JF - The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants

SN - 0882-2786

IS - 5

ER -