How accurately do young adults recall childhood pets? A validation study

Charlotte Nicholas, Ganesa Wegienka, Suzanne Havstad, Dennis Randall Ownby, Christine Cole Johnson, Edward Zoratti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Epidemiologic research shows that pets influence human health, demonstrating both protective and deleterious health risks; therefore, valid definitions of pet exposure would enhance research. The authors determined how well young adults aged 18 years report their early childhood pets. Subjects in an established birth cohort from Detroit, Michigan, born in 1987-1989 (n=820) were asked a series of questions about pets in the home during their first 6 years of life. Pet recall was compared with annual prospectively collected parental report from 12-18 years prior. Exposure to cats was correctly reported on average 86.3% of the time (95% confidence interval: 85.0, 87.5) and dogs 79.2% (95% confidence interval: 77.7, 80.6) of the time (P<0.01). Cats and dogs were more likely to be underreported than overreported, from as few as 1.8-fold to as many as 8.3-fold (P<0.05). Reporting differed by sex of the respondent and current pet ownership. No differences were found in reporting by those who experienced allergy symptoms near dogs or cats. Findings suggest good reliability of young adult pet reporting for ages 0-6 years but that childhood pet exposure may need to be assessed separately depending on the participant's sex and the outcome of interest.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)388-392
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Epidemiology
Volume170
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Validation Studies
Pets
Young Adult
Cats
Dogs
Confidence Intervals
Ownership
Age Factors
Health
Research
Hypersensitivity
Parturition

Keywords

  • Animals, domestic
  • Asthma
  • Cats
  • Cohort studies
  • Dogs
  • Hypersensitivity
  • Mental recall
  • Validation studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Cite this

How accurately do young adults recall childhood pets? A validation study. / Nicholas, Charlotte; Wegienka, Ganesa; Havstad, Suzanne; Ownby, Dennis Randall; Johnson, Christine Cole; Zoratti, Edward.

In: American Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 170, No. 3, 01.08.2009, p. 388-392.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nicholas, C, Wegienka, G, Havstad, S, Ownby, DR, Johnson, CC & Zoratti, E 2009, 'How accurately do young adults recall childhood pets? A validation study', American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 170, no. 3, pp. 388-392. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwp139
Nicholas, Charlotte ; Wegienka, Ganesa ; Havstad, Suzanne ; Ownby, Dennis Randall ; Johnson, Christine Cole ; Zoratti, Edward. / How accurately do young adults recall childhood pets? A validation study. In: American Journal of Epidemiology. 2009 ; Vol. 170, No. 3. pp. 388-392.
@article{184895cc63834243bd49031a7efeb2d2,
title = "How accurately do young adults recall childhood pets? A validation study",
abstract = "Epidemiologic research shows that pets influence human health, demonstrating both protective and deleterious health risks; therefore, valid definitions of pet exposure would enhance research. The authors determined how well young adults aged 18 years report their early childhood pets. Subjects in an established birth cohort from Detroit, Michigan, born in 1987-1989 (n=820) were asked a series of questions about pets in the home during their first 6 years of life. Pet recall was compared with annual prospectively collected parental report from 12-18 years prior. Exposure to cats was correctly reported on average 86.3{\%} of the time (95{\%} confidence interval: 85.0, 87.5) and dogs 79.2{\%} (95{\%} confidence interval: 77.7, 80.6) of the time (P<0.01). Cats and dogs were more likely to be underreported than overreported, from as few as 1.8-fold to as many as 8.3-fold (P<0.05). Reporting differed by sex of the respondent and current pet ownership. No differences were found in reporting by those who experienced allergy symptoms near dogs or cats. Findings suggest good reliability of young adult pet reporting for ages 0-6 years but that childhood pet exposure may need to be assessed separately depending on the participant's sex and the outcome of interest.",
keywords = "Animals, domestic, Asthma, Cats, Cohort studies, Dogs, Hypersensitivity, Mental recall, Validation studies",
author = "Charlotte Nicholas and Ganesa Wegienka and Suzanne Havstad and Ownby, {Dennis Randall} and Johnson, {Christine Cole} and Edward Zoratti",
year = "2009",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/aje/kwp139",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "170",
pages = "388--392",
journal = "American Journal of Epidemiology",
issn = "0002-9262",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How accurately do young adults recall childhood pets? A validation study

AU - Nicholas, Charlotte

AU - Wegienka, Ganesa

AU - Havstad, Suzanne

AU - Ownby, Dennis Randall

AU - Johnson, Christine Cole

AU - Zoratti, Edward

PY - 2009/8/1

Y1 - 2009/8/1

N2 - Epidemiologic research shows that pets influence human health, demonstrating both protective and deleterious health risks; therefore, valid definitions of pet exposure would enhance research. The authors determined how well young adults aged 18 years report their early childhood pets. Subjects in an established birth cohort from Detroit, Michigan, born in 1987-1989 (n=820) were asked a series of questions about pets in the home during their first 6 years of life. Pet recall was compared with annual prospectively collected parental report from 12-18 years prior. Exposure to cats was correctly reported on average 86.3% of the time (95% confidence interval: 85.0, 87.5) and dogs 79.2% (95% confidence interval: 77.7, 80.6) of the time (P<0.01). Cats and dogs were more likely to be underreported than overreported, from as few as 1.8-fold to as many as 8.3-fold (P<0.05). Reporting differed by sex of the respondent and current pet ownership. No differences were found in reporting by those who experienced allergy symptoms near dogs or cats. Findings suggest good reliability of young adult pet reporting for ages 0-6 years but that childhood pet exposure may need to be assessed separately depending on the participant's sex and the outcome of interest.

AB - Epidemiologic research shows that pets influence human health, demonstrating both protective and deleterious health risks; therefore, valid definitions of pet exposure would enhance research. The authors determined how well young adults aged 18 years report their early childhood pets. Subjects in an established birth cohort from Detroit, Michigan, born in 1987-1989 (n=820) were asked a series of questions about pets in the home during their first 6 years of life. Pet recall was compared with annual prospectively collected parental report from 12-18 years prior. Exposure to cats was correctly reported on average 86.3% of the time (95% confidence interval: 85.0, 87.5) and dogs 79.2% (95% confidence interval: 77.7, 80.6) of the time (P<0.01). Cats and dogs were more likely to be underreported than overreported, from as few as 1.8-fold to as many as 8.3-fold (P<0.05). Reporting differed by sex of the respondent and current pet ownership. No differences were found in reporting by those who experienced allergy symptoms near dogs or cats. Findings suggest good reliability of young adult pet reporting for ages 0-6 years but that childhood pet exposure may need to be assessed separately depending on the participant's sex and the outcome of interest.

KW - Animals, domestic

KW - Asthma

KW - Cats

KW - Cohort studies

KW - Dogs

KW - Hypersensitivity

KW - Mental recall

KW - Validation studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67749143858&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67749143858&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/aje/kwp139

DO - 10.1093/aje/kwp139

M3 - Article

VL - 170

SP - 388

EP - 392

JO - American Journal of Epidemiology

JF - American Journal of Epidemiology

SN - 0002-9262

IS - 3

ER -