How Common Is White Coat Hypertension?

Thomas G. Pickering, Gary D. James, Charlene Boddie, Gregory A Harshfield, Seymour Blank, John H. Laragh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1029 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Twenty-one percent of 292 patients with untreated borderline hypertension (clinic diastolic blood pressures persistently between 90 and 104 mm Hg) were found to have normal daytime ambulatory pressures (defined from a population of normotensive subjects). These patients were defined as having “white coat” hypertension, and they were more likely to be female and younger, to weigh less, and to be more recently diagnosed than patients whose pressure was elevated both in the clinic and during ambulatory monitoring. Patients with white coat hypertension did not show a generalized increase of blood pressure lability, nor an exaggerated pressor response while at work. The phenomenon is more pronounced when blood pressure is measured by a physician than by a technician. In such patients, the pressor response may be relatively specific to the physician’s office and lead to significant misclassification of hypertension.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)225-228
Number of pages4
JournalJAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
Volume259
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 8 1988
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

White Coat Hypertension
Blood Pressure
Hypertension
Pressure
Ambulatory Monitoring
Physicians' Offices
Physicians
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

How Common Is White Coat Hypertension? / Pickering, Thomas G.; James, Gary D.; Boddie, Charlene; Harshfield, Gregory A; Blank, Seymour; Laragh, John H.

In: JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 259, No. 2, 08.01.1988, p. 225-228.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pickering, Thomas G. ; James, Gary D. ; Boddie, Charlene ; Harshfield, Gregory A ; Blank, Seymour ; Laragh, John H. / How Common Is White Coat Hypertension?. In: JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. 1988 ; Vol. 259, No. 2. pp. 225-228.
@article{888ca4e59ad241da92a8e06d852ae4a6,
title = "How Common Is White Coat Hypertension?",
abstract = "Twenty-one percent of 292 patients with untreated borderline hypertension (clinic diastolic blood pressures persistently between 90 and 104 mm Hg) were found to have normal daytime ambulatory pressures (defined from a population of normotensive subjects). These patients were defined as having “white coat” hypertension, and they were more likely to be female and younger, to weigh less, and to be more recently diagnosed than patients whose pressure was elevated both in the clinic and during ambulatory monitoring. Patients with white coat hypertension did not show a generalized increase of blood pressure lability, nor an exaggerated pressor response while at work. The phenomenon is more pronounced when blood pressure is measured by a physician than by a technician. In such patients, the pressor response may be relatively specific to the physician’s office and lead to significant misclassification of hypertension.",
author = "Pickering, {Thomas G.} and James, {Gary D.} and Charlene Boddie and Harshfield, {Gregory A} and Seymour Blank and Laragh, {John H.}",
year = "1988",
month = "1",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1001/jama.1988.03720020027031",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "259",
pages = "225--228",
journal = "JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association",
issn = "0002-9955",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How Common Is White Coat Hypertension?

AU - Pickering, Thomas G.

AU - James, Gary D.

AU - Boddie, Charlene

AU - Harshfield, Gregory A

AU - Blank, Seymour

AU - Laragh, John H.

PY - 1988/1/8

Y1 - 1988/1/8

N2 - Twenty-one percent of 292 patients with untreated borderline hypertension (clinic diastolic blood pressures persistently between 90 and 104 mm Hg) were found to have normal daytime ambulatory pressures (defined from a population of normotensive subjects). These patients were defined as having “white coat” hypertension, and they were more likely to be female and younger, to weigh less, and to be more recently diagnosed than patients whose pressure was elevated both in the clinic and during ambulatory monitoring. Patients with white coat hypertension did not show a generalized increase of blood pressure lability, nor an exaggerated pressor response while at work. The phenomenon is more pronounced when blood pressure is measured by a physician than by a technician. In such patients, the pressor response may be relatively specific to the physician’s office and lead to significant misclassification of hypertension.

AB - Twenty-one percent of 292 patients with untreated borderline hypertension (clinic diastolic blood pressures persistently between 90 and 104 mm Hg) were found to have normal daytime ambulatory pressures (defined from a population of normotensive subjects). These patients were defined as having “white coat” hypertension, and they were more likely to be female and younger, to weigh less, and to be more recently diagnosed than patients whose pressure was elevated both in the clinic and during ambulatory monitoring. Patients with white coat hypertension did not show a generalized increase of blood pressure lability, nor an exaggerated pressor response while at work. The phenomenon is more pronounced when blood pressure is measured by a physician than by a technician. In such patients, the pressor response may be relatively specific to the physician’s office and lead to significant misclassification of hypertension.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023839194&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023839194&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/jama.1988.03720020027031

DO - 10.1001/jama.1988.03720020027031

M3 - Article

VL - 259

SP - 225

EP - 228

JO - JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

JF - JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

SN - 0002-9955

IS - 2

ER -