How potential tourists react to mass media marketing

Advertising versus Publicity

Marsha D Loda, William Norman, Kenneth Backman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to examine the persuasive effects of message presentation (i.e., advertising or publicity) on the effectiveness of marketing a tourist destination. This research attempts to test whether there is a difference between advertising and publicity on message acceptance and message response. Four dependent variables are studied: message strength, perceived credibility, attitude toward the destination, and purchase intent. Results of the study show that publicity created significantly higher mean scores than advertising for three of the four dependent variables tested. This study confirms that publicity is an important element in the tourism marketing mix. It also adds empirical evidence to Gartner’s (1993) typology of image change agents, supporting publicity’s effectiveness in developing the touristic image.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)49-61
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Travel and Tourism Marketing
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 16 2005

Fingerprint

mass media
marketing
tourist destination
typology
tourism
Marketing
Tourists
Mass media
Publicity

Keywords

  • Advertising
  • Destination selection
  • Publicity
  • Tourism marketing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management
  • Marketing

Cite this

How potential tourists react to mass media marketing : Advertising versus Publicity. / Loda, Marsha D; Norman, William; Backman, Kenneth.

In: Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, Vol. 18, No. 3, 16.08.2005, p. 49-61.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f270fee6c6b646e190c5c4ef532d3c27,
title = "How potential tourists react to mass media marketing: Advertising versus Publicity",
abstract = "The purpose of this research is to examine the persuasive effects of message presentation (i.e., advertising or publicity) on the effectiveness of marketing a tourist destination. This research attempts to test whether there is a difference between advertising and publicity on message acceptance and message response. Four dependent variables are studied: message strength, perceived credibility, attitude toward the destination, and purchase intent. Results of the study show that publicity created significantly higher mean scores than advertising for three of the four dependent variables tested. This study confirms that publicity is an important element in the tourism marketing mix. It also adds empirical evidence to Gartner’s (1993) typology of image change agents, supporting publicity’s effectiveness in developing the touristic image.",
keywords = "Advertising, Destination selection, Publicity, Tourism marketing",
author = "Loda, {Marsha D} and William Norman and Kenneth Backman",
year = "2005",
month = "8",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1300/J073v18n03_06",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "49--61",
journal = "Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing",
issn = "1054-8408",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How potential tourists react to mass media marketing

T2 - Advertising versus Publicity

AU - Loda, Marsha D

AU - Norman, William

AU - Backman, Kenneth

PY - 2005/8/16

Y1 - 2005/8/16

N2 - The purpose of this research is to examine the persuasive effects of message presentation (i.e., advertising or publicity) on the effectiveness of marketing a tourist destination. This research attempts to test whether there is a difference between advertising and publicity on message acceptance and message response. Four dependent variables are studied: message strength, perceived credibility, attitude toward the destination, and purchase intent. Results of the study show that publicity created significantly higher mean scores than advertising for three of the four dependent variables tested. This study confirms that publicity is an important element in the tourism marketing mix. It also adds empirical evidence to Gartner’s (1993) typology of image change agents, supporting publicity’s effectiveness in developing the touristic image.

AB - The purpose of this research is to examine the persuasive effects of message presentation (i.e., advertising or publicity) on the effectiveness of marketing a tourist destination. This research attempts to test whether there is a difference between advertising and publicity on message acceptance and message response. Four dependent variables are studied: message strength, perceived credibility, attitude toward the destination, and purchase intent. Results of the study show that publicity created significantly higher mean scores than advertising for three of the four dependent variables tested. This study confirms that publicity is an important element in the tourism marketing mix. It also adds empirical evidence to Gartner’s (1993) typology of image change agents, supporting publicity’s effectiveness in developing the touristic image.

KW - Advertising

KW - Destination selection

KW - Publicity

KW - Tourism marketing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=69249176657&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=69249176657&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1300/J073v18n03_06

DO - 10.1300/J073v18n03_06

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 49

EP - 61

JO - Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing

JF - Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing

SN - 1054-8408

IS - 3

ER -