How to critically appraise the clinical literature

Paul Cronin, James V Rawson, Marta E. Heilbrun, Janie M. Lee, Aine M. Kelly, Pina C. Sanelli, Brian W. Bresnahan, Angelisa M. Paladin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent efforts have been made to standardize the critical appraisal of clinical health care research. In this article, critical appraisal of diagnostic test accuracy studies, screening studies, therapeutic studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, cost-effectiveness studies, recommendations and/or guidelines, and medical education studies is discussed as are the available instruments to appraise the literature. By having standard appraisal instruments, these studies can be appraised more easily for completeness, bias, and applicability for implementation. Appraisal requires a different set of instruments, each designed for the individual type of research. We also hope that this article can be used in academic programs to educate the faculty and trainees of the available resources to improve critical appraisal of health research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1117-1128
Number of pages12
JournalAcademic Radiology
Volume21
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Health Services Research
Medical Education
Research
Routine Diagnostic Tests
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Meta-Analysis
Guidelines
Health
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Appraisal
  • Cost-effectiveness assessments
  • Diagnostic test accuracy
  • Guidelines
  • Medical education
  • Recommendations
  • Screening
  • Systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Therapy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Cronin, P., Rawson, J. V., Heilbrun, M. E., Lee, J. M., Kelly, A. M., Sanelli, P. C., ... Paladin, A. M. (2014). How to critically appraise the clinical literature. Academic Radiology, 21(9), 1117-1128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2014.05.004

How to critically appraise the clinical literature. / Cronin, Paul; Rawson, James V; Heilbrun, Marta E.; Lee, Janie M.; Kelly, Aine M.; Sanelli, Pina C.; Bresnahan, Brian W.; Paladin, Angelisa M.

In: Academic Radiology, Vol. 21, No. 9, 01.01.2014, p. 1117-1128.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cronin, P, Rawson, JV, Heilbrun, ME, Lee, JM, Kelly, AM, Sanelli, PC, Bresnahan, BW & Paladin, AM 2014, 'How to critically appraise the clinical literature', Academic Radiology, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 1117-1128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2014.05.004
Cronin P, Rawson JV, Heilbrun ME, Lee JM, Kelly AM, Sanelli PC et al. How to critically appraise the clinical literature. Academic Radiology. 2014 Jan 1;21(9):1117-1128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2014.05.004
Cronin, Paul ; Rawson, James V ; Heilbrun, Marta E. ; Lee, Janie M. ; Kelly, Aine M. ; Sanelli, Pina C. ; Bresnahan, Brian W. ; Paladin, Angelisa M. / How to critically appraise the clinical literature. In: Academic Radiology. 2014 ; Vol. 21, No. 9. pp. 1117-1128.
@article{fa6b562a722c4dfbb2274b84d29a54d4,
title = "How to critically appraise the clinical literature",
abstract = "Recent efforts have been made to standardize the critical appraisal of clinical health care research. In this article, critical appraisal of diagnostic test accuracy studies, screening studies, therapeutic studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, cost-effectiveness studies, recommendations and/or guidelines, and medical education studies is discussed as are the available instruments to appraise the literature. By having standard appraisal instruments, these studies can be appraised more easily for completeness, bias, and applicability for implementation. Appraisal requires a different set of instruments, each designed for the individual type of research. We also hope that this article can be used in academic programs to educate the faculty and trainees of the available resources to improve critical appraisal of health research.",
keywords = "Appraisal, Cost-effectiveness assessments, Diagnostic test accuracy, Guidelines, Medical education, Recommendations, Screening, Systematic review and meta-analysis, Therapy",
author = "Paul Cronin and Rawson, {James V} and Heilbrun, {Marta E.} and Lee, {Janie M.} and Kelly, {Aine M.} and Sanelli, {Pina C.} and Bresnahan, {Brian W.} and Paladin, {Angelisa M.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.acra.2014.05.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "1117--1128",
journal = "Academic Radiology",
issn = "1076-6332",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How to critically appraise the clinical literature

AU - Cronin, Paul

AU - Rawson, James V

AU - Heilbrun, Marta E.

AU - Lee, Janie M.

AU - Kelly, Aine M.

AU - Sanelli, Pina C.

AU - Bresnahan, Brian W.

AU - Paladin, Angelisa M.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Recent efforts have been made to standardize the critical appraisal of clinical health care research. In this article, critical appraisal of diagnostic test accuracy studies, screening studies, therapeutic studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, cost-effectiveness studies, recommendations and/or guidelines, and medical education studies is discussed as are the available instruments to appraise the literature. By having standard appraisal instruments, these studies can be appraised more easily for completeness, bias, and applicability for implementation. Appraisal requires a different set of instruments, each designed for the individual type of research. We also hope that this article can be used in academic programs to educate the faculty and trainees of the available resources to improve critical appraisal of health research.

AB - Recent efforts have been made to standardize the critical appraisal of clinical health care research. In this article, critical appraisal of diagnostic test accuracy studies, screening studies, therapeutic studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, cost-effectiveness studies, recommendations and/or guidelines, and medical education studies is discussed as are the available instruments to appraise the literature. By having standard appraisal instruments, these studies can be appraised more easily for completeness, bias, and applicability for implementation. Appraisal requires a different set of instruments, each designed for the individual type of research. We also hope that this article can be used in academic programs to educate the faculty and trainees of the available resources to improve critical appraisal of health research.

KW - Appraisal

KW - Cost-effectiveness assessments

KW - Diagnostic test accuracy

KW - Guidelines

KW - Medical education

KW - Recommendations

KW - Screening

KW - Systematic review and meta-analysis

KW - Therapy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84905440641&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84905440641&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.acra.2014.05.004

DO - 10.1016/j.acra.2014.05.004

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 1117

EP - 1128

JO - Academic Radiology

JF - Academic Radiology

SN - 1076-6332

IS - 9

ER -