Identification of resected root-end dentinal cracks: A comparative study of visual magnification

C. Cornelious Slaton, Robert J. Loushine, R. Norman Weller, Merle H Parker, W. Frank Kimbrough, David H. Pashley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of visual enhancements as aids in identifying artificially created dentinal cracks in resected root ends. Fifty human maxillary central incisors were decoronated, and the root canals were instrumented to ISO size 50 at the working length. The apical 3 mm of the roots were resected, and cracks were artificially created in the apical dentin with an average load of 5.6 kg using a cylindrical wedge in a miniature drill press. A video microscope at x65 magnification was used to observe the cracks as they developed. Four independent examiners evaluated the root specimens using unaided/corrected vision (group 1), loupes at x3.3 magnification (group 2), a surgical operating microscope at x10 magnification (group 3), and the Orascope at x35 magnification (group 4). The examiners' proficiency at correctly identifying root ends with and without cracks was evaluated. The data were compared to the predetermined standard (27 cracked, 23 not cracked) with a one-tailed Fisher's exact test (α = 0.05). Statistically, the Orascope (p = 0.02) was significantly superior, whereas using unaided/corrected vision (p = 0.99), loupes (p = 0.88), or the microscope (p = 0.14) was not significantly better than guessing. The accuracy of correct identification for unaided/ corrected vision, loupes, the microscope, and the Orascope was 39%, 45%, 53%, and 58%, respectively. A two-way analysis of variance of the accuracy of crack identification showed a significant difference among the four visualization techniques (p = 0.0007) and also among the four evaluators (p = 0.006).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)519-522
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Endodontics
Volume29
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2003

Fingerprint

Mandrillus
Dental Pulp Cavity
Dentin
Incisor
Analysis of Variance
In Vitro Techniques

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Identification of resected root-end dentinal cracks : A comparative study of visual magnification. / Slaton, C. Cornelious; Loushine, Robert J.; Weller, R. Norman; Parker, Merle H; Kimbrough, W. Frank; Pashley, David H.

In: Journal of Endodontics, Vol. 29, No. 8, 01.01.2003, p. 519-522.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Slaton, C. Cornelious ; Loushine, Robert J. ; Weller, R. Norman ; Parker, Merle H ; Kimbrough, W. Frank ; Pashley, David H. / Identification of resected root-end dentinal cracks : A comparative study of visual magnification. In: Journal of Endodontics. 2003 ; Vol. 29, No. 8. pp. 519-522.
@article{01c99a0f3a154867a2b9cf0d17277ea1,
title = "Identification of resected root-end dentinal cracks: A comparative study of visual magnification",
abstract = "The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of visual enhancements as aids in identifying artificially created dentinal cracks in resected root ends. Fifty human maxillary central incisors were decoronated, and the root canals were instrumented to ISO size 50 at the working length. The apical 3 mm of the roots were resected, and cracks were artificially created in the apical dentin with an average load of 5.6 kg using a cylindrical wedge in a miniature drill press. A video microscope at x65 magnification was used to observe the cracks as they developed. Four independent examiners evaluated the root specimens using unaided/corrected vision (group 1), loupes at x3.3 magnification (group 2), a surgical operating microscope at x10 magnification (group 3), and the Orascope at x35 magnification (group 4). The examiners' proficiency at correctly identifying root ends with and without cracks was evaluated. The data were compared to the predetermined standard (27 cracked, 23 not cracked) with a one-tailed Fisher's exact test (α = 0.05). Statistically, the Orascope (p = 0.02) was significantly superior, whereas using unaided/corrected vision (p = 0.99), loupes (p = 0.88), or the microscope (p = 0.14) was not significantly better than guessing. The accuracy of correct identification for unaided/ corrected vision, loupes, the microscope, and the Orascope was 39{\%}, 45{\%}, 53{\%}, and 58{\%}, respectively. A two-way analysis of variance of the accuracy of crack identification showed a significant difference among the four visualization techniques (p = 0.0007) and also among the four evaluators (p = 0.006).",
author = "Slaton, {C. Cornelious} and Loushine, {Robert J.} and Weller, {R. Norman} and Parker, {Merle H} and Kimbrough, {W. Frank} and Pashley, {David H.}",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00004770-200308000-00007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "519--522",
journal = "Journal of Endodontics",
issn = "0099-2399",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identification of resected root-end dentinal cracks

T2 - A comparative study of visual magnification

AU - Slaton, C. Cornelious

AU - Loushine, Robert J.

AU - Weller, R. Norman

AU - Parker, Merle H

AU - Kimbrough, W. Frank

AU - Pashley, David H.

PY - 2003/1/1

Y1 - 2003/1/1

N2 - The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of visual enhancements as aids in identifying artificially created dentinal cracks in resected root ends. Fifty human maxillary central incisors were decoronated, and the root canals were instrumented to ISO size 50 at the working length. The apical 3 mm of the roots were resected, and cracks were artificially created in the apical dentin with an average load of 5.6 kg using a cylindrical wedge in a miniature drill press. A video microscope at x65 magnification was used to observe the cracks as they developed. Four independent examiners evaluated the root specimens using unaided/corrected vision (group 1), loupes at x3.3 magnification (group 2), a surgical operating microscope at x10 magnification (group 3), and the Orascope at x35 magnification (group 4). The examiners' proficiency at correctly identifying root ends with and without cracks was evaluated. The data were compared to the predetermined standard (27 cracked, 23 not cracked) with a one-tailed Fisher's exact test (α = 0.05). Statistically, the Orascope (p = 0.02) was significantly superior, whereas using unaided/corrected vision (p = 0.99), loupes (p = 0.88), or the microscope (p = 0.14) was not significantly better than guessing. The accuracy of correct identification for unaided/ corrected vision, loupes, the microscope, and the Orascope was 39%, 45%, 53%, and 58%, respectively. A two-way analysis of variance of the accuracy of crack identification showed a significant difference among the four visualization techniques (p = 0.0007) and also among the four evaluators (p = 0.006).

AB - The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of visual enhancements as aids in identifying artificially created dentinal cracks in resected root ends. Fifty human maxillary central incisors were decoronated, and the root canals were instrumented to ISO size 50 at the working length. The apical 3 mm of the roots were resected, and cracks were artificially created in the apical dentin with an average load of 5.6 kg using a cylindrical wedge in a miniature drill press. A video microscope at x65 magnification was used to observe the cracks as they developed. Four independent examiners evaluated the root specimens using unaided/corrected vision (group 1), loupes at x3.3 magnification (group 2), a surgical operating microscope at x10 magnification (group 3), and the Orascope at x35 magnification (group 4). The examiners' proficiency at correctly identifying root ends with and without cracks was evaluated. The data were compared to the predetermined standard (27 cracked, 23 not cracked) with a one-tailed Fisher's exact test (α = 0.05). Statistically, the Orascope (p = 0.02) was significantly superior, whereas using unaided/corrected vision (p = 0.99), loupes (p = 0.88), or the microscope (p = 0.14) was not significantly better than guessing. The accuracy of correct identification for unaided/ corrected vision, loupes, the microscope, and the Orascope was 39%, 45%, 53%, and 58%, respectively. A two-way analysis of variance of the accuracy of crack identification showed a significant difference among the four visualization techniques (p = 0.0007) and also among the four evaluators (p = 0.006).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0141906302&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0141906302&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00004770-200308000-00007

DO - 10.1097/00004770-200308000-00007

M3 - Article

C2 - 12929699

AN - SCOPUS:0141906302

VL - 29

SP - 519

EP - 522

JO - Journal of Endodontics

JF - Journal of Endodontics

SN - 0099-2399

IS - 8

ER -