Image-guided localization accuracy of stereoscopic planar and volumetric imaging methods for stereotactic radiation surgery and stereotactic body radiation therapy: A phantom study

Jinkoo Kim, Jian Yue Jin, Nicole Walls, Teamour Nurushev, Benjamin Movsas, Indrin J. Chetty, Samuel Ryu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the positioning accuracies of two image-guided localization systems, ExacTrac and On-Board Imager (OBI), in a stereotactic treatment unit. Methods and Materials: An anthropomorphic pelvis phantom with eight internal metal markers (BBs) was used. The center of one BB was set as plan isocenter. The phantom was set up on a treatment table with various initial setup errors. Then, the errors were corrected using each of the investigated systems. The residual errors were measured with respect to the radiation isocenter using orthogonal portal images with field size 3 × 3 cm 2. The angular localization discrepancies of the two systems and the correction accuracy of the robotic couch were also studied. A pair of pre - and post - cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images was acquired for each angular correction. Then, the correction errors were estimated by using the internal BBs through fiducial marker-based registrations. Results: The isocenter localization errors (μ ± σ) in the left/right, posterior/anterior, and superior/inferior directions were, respectively, -0.2 ± 0.2 mm, -0.8 ± 0.2 mm, and -0.8 ± 0.4 mm for ExacTrac, and 0.5 ± 0.7 mm, 0.6 ± 0.5 mm, and 0.0 ± 0.5 mm for OBI CBCT. The registration angular discrepancy was 0.1 ± 0.2° between the two systems, and the maximum angle correction error of the robotic couch was 0.2° about all axes. Conclusion: Both the ExacTrac and the OBI CBCT systems showed approximately 1 mm isocenter localization accuracies. The angular discrepancy of two systems was minimal, and the robotic couch angle correction was accurate. These positioning uncertainties should be taken as a lower bound because the results were based on a rigid dosimetry phantom.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1588-1596
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
Volume79
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2011

Fingerprint

Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Robotics
surgery
radiation therapy
Radiotherapy
Radiation
couches
radiation
robotics
Fiducial Markers
cones
tomography
Pelvis
markers
positioning
Uncertainty
Metals
pelvis
Therapeutics
dosimeters

Keywords

  • Cone-beam computed tomography
  • ExacTrac
  • Novalis Tx
  • Stereotactic radiotherapy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiation
  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Cancer Research

Cite this

Image-guided localization accuracy of stereoscopic planar and volumetric imaging methods for stereotactic radiation surgery and stereotactic body radiation therapy : A phantom study. / Kim, Jinkoo; Jin, Jian Yue; Walls, Nicole; Nurushev, Teamour; Movsas, Benjamin; Chetty, Indrin J.; Ryu, Samuel.

In: International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, Vol. 79, No. 5, 01.04.2011, p. 1588-1596.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kim, Jinkoo ; Jin, Jian Yue ; Walls, Nicole ; Nurushev, Teamour ; Movsas, Benjamin ; Chetty, Indrin J. ; Ryu, Samuel. / Image-guided localization accuracy of stereoscopic planar and volumetric imaging methods for stereotactic radiation surgery and stereotactic body radiation therapy : A phantom study. In: International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. 2011 ; Vol. 79, No. 5. pp. 1588-1596.
@article{f15eb48f75724bdf8d7a36c418890e24,
title = "Image-guided localization accuracy of stereoscopic planar and volumetric imaging methods for stereotactic radiation surgery and stereotactic body radiation therapy: A phantom study",
abstract = "Purpose: To evaluate the positioning accuracies of two image-guided localization systems, ExacTrac and On-Board Imager (OBI), in a stereotactic treatment unit. Methods and Materials: An anthropomorphic pelvis phantom with eight internal metal markers (BBs) was used. The center of one BB was set as plan isocenter. The phantom was set up on a treatment table with various initial setup errors. Then, the errors were corrected using each of the investigated systems. The residual errors were measured with respect to the radiation isocenter using orthogonal portal images with field size 3 × 3 cm 2. The angular localization discrepancies of the two systems and the correction accuracy of the robotic couch were also studied. A pair of pre - and post - cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images was acquired for each angular correction. Then, the correction errors were estimated by using the internal BBs through fiducial marker-based registrations. Results: The isocenter localization errors (μ ± σ) in the left/right, posterior/anterior, and superior/inferior directions were, respectively, -0.2 ± 0.2 mm, -0.8 ± 0.2 mm, and -0.8 ± 0.4 mm for ExacTrac, and 0.5 ± 0.7 mm, 0.6 ± 0.5 mm, and 0.0 ± 0.5 mm for OBI CBCT. The registration angular discrepancy was 0.1 ± 0.2° between the two systems, and the maximum angle correction error of the robotic couch was 0.2° about all axes. Conclusion: Both the ExacTrac and the OBI CBCT systems showed approximately 1 mm isocenter localization accuracies. The angular discrepancy of two systems was minimal, and the robotic couch angle correction was accurate. These positioning uncertainties should be taken as a lower bound because the results were based on a rigid dosimetry phantom.",
keywords = "Cone-beam computed tomography, ExacTrac, Novalis Tx, Stereotactic radiotherapy",
author = "Jinkoo Kim and Jin, {Jian Yue} and Nicole Walls and Teamour Nurushev and Benjamin Movsas and Chetty, {Indrin J.} and Samuel Ryu",
year = "2011",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.05.052",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "79",
pages = "1588--1596",
journal = "International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics",
issn = "0360-3016",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Image-guided localization accuracy of stereoscopic planar and volumetric imaging methods for stereotactic radiation surgery and stereotactic body radiation therapy

T2 - A phantom study

AU - Kim, Jinkoo

AU - Jin, Jian Yue

AU - Walls, Nicole

AU - Nurushev, Teamour

AU - Movsas, Benjamin

AU - Chetty, Indrin J.

AU - Ryu, Samuel

PY - 2011/4/1

Y1 - 2011/4/1

N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the positioning accuracies of two image-guided localization systems, ExacTrac and On-Board Imager (OBI), in a stereotactic treatment unit. Methods and Materials: An anthropomorphic pelvis phantom with eight internal metal markers (BBs) was used. The center of one BB was set as plan isocenter. The phantom was set up on a treatment table with various initial setup errors. Then, the errors were corrected using each of the investigated systems. The residual errors were measured with respect to the radiation isocenter using orthogonal portal images with field size 3 × 3 cm 2. The angular localization discrepancies of the two systems and the correction accuracy of the robotic couch were also studied. A pair of pre - and post - cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images was acquired for each angular correction. Then, the correction errors were estimated by using the internal BBs through fiducial marker-based registrations. Results: The isocenter localization errors (μ ± σ) in the left/right, posterior/anterior, and superior/inferior directions were, respectively, -0.2 ± 0.2 mm, -0.8 ± 0.2 mm, and -0.8 ± 0.4 mm for ExacTrac, and 0.5 ± 0.7 mm, 0.6 ± 0.5 mm, and 0.0 ± 0.5 mm for OBI CBCT. The registration angular discrepancy was 0.1 ± 0.2° between the two systems, and the maximum angle correction error of the robotic couch was 0.2° about all axes. Conclusion: Both the ExacTrac and the OBI CBCT systems showed approximately 1 mm isocenter localization accuracies. The angular discrepancy of two systems was minimal, and the robotic couch angle correction was accurate. These positioning uncertainties should be taken as a lower bound because the results were based on a rigid dosimetry phantom.

AB - Purpose: To evaluate the positioning accuracies of two image-guided localization systems, ExacTrac and On-Board Imager (OBI), in a stereotactic treatment unit. Methods and Materials: An anthropomorphic pelvis phantom with eight internal metal markers (BBs) was used. The center of one BB was set as plan isocenter. The phantom was set up on a treatment table with various initial setup errors. Then, the errors were corrected using each of the investigated systems. The residual errors were measured with respect to the radiation isocenter using orthogonal portal images with field size 3 × 3 cm 2. The angular localization discrepancies of the two systems and the correction accuracy of the robotic couch were also studied. A pair of pre - and post - cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images was acquired for each angular correction. Then, the correction errors were estimated by using the internal BBs through fiducial marker-based registrations. Results: The isocenter localization errors (μ ± σ) in the left/right, posterior/anterior, and superior/inferior directions were, respectively, -0.2 ± 0.2 mm, -0.8 ± 0.2 mm, and -0.8 ± 0.4 mm for ExacTrac, and 0.5 ± 0.7 mm, 0.6 ± 0.5 mm, and 0.0 ± 0.5 mm for OBI CBCT. The registration angular discrepancy was 0.1 ± 0.2° between the two systems, and the maximum angle correction error of the robotic couch was 0.2° about all axes. Conclusion: Both the ExacTrac and the OBI CBCT systems showed approximately 1 mm isocenter localization accuracies. The angular discrepancy of two systems was minimal, and the robotic couch angle correction was accurate. These positioning uncertainties should be taken as a lower bound because the results were based on a rigid dosimetry phantom.

KW - Cone-beam computed tomography

KW - ExacTrac

KW - Novalis Tx

KW - Stereotactic radiotherapy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952705615&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952705615&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.05.052

DO - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.05.052

M3 - Article

C2 - 20832184

AN - SCOPUS:79952705615

VL - 79

SP - 1588

EP - 1596

JO - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

JF - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

SN - 0360-3016

IS - 5

ER -