Impact of a quality improvement intervention to increase brief alcohol and drug interventions on a level i trauma service

Princess Thomas, J. Paul Seale, J Aaron Johnson, Jason Dhabliwala, Debra Kitchens, Ike S. Okosun, Nathan A. Stokes, Dennis Ashley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Screening and brief intervention (SBI) decreases alcohol use and related consequences among trauma patients. Although SBI is required in Level I and II trauma centers, implementation often is difficult. This study used the Plan-Do-Study-Act approach to identify and implement measures to increase the number of patients receiving SBI at a Level I trauma center. A multidisciplinary Quality Improvement Committee with representation from the Trauma Service and SBI Team met monthly during 2011. Stepwise interventions included identifying a resident "champion" responsible for screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment, including an SBI report at monthly trauma conferences, and incorporating SBI into the trauma order set. Outcomes measures were number of patients screened, patients screening positive, and the number of patients receiving SBI. At baseline, 170 of 362 patients (47%) were screened, 68/170 (40%) had positive screens, and 30/68 (44% of those with positive screens) received SBI services. Quarter 2 saw increases in patients screened - 275/437 (63%), patients screening positive (106/275; 39%) and those receiving SBI (60/106; 57%). Increases culminated in Quarter 4 with screening 401/466 (86%; P < 0.001) patients, 208/401 (52%; P < 0.001) patients screening positive, and 114 patients (55%; P = 0.296) receiving services. Use of similar quality improvement measures nationwide could improve rates of provision of this important service.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)468-473
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Surgeon
Volume82
Issue number5
StatePublished - May 1 2016

Fingerprint

Quality Improvement
Alcohols
Wounds and Injuries
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Trauma Centers
Referral and Consultation
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Thomas, P., Seale, J. P., Johnson, J. A., Dhabliwala, J., Kitchens, D., Okosun, I. S., ... Ashley, D. (2016). Impact of a quality improvement intervention to increase brief alcohol and drug interventions on a level i trauma service. American Surgeon, 82(5), 468-473.

Impact of a quality improvement intervention to increase brief alcohol and drug interventions on a level i trauma service. / Thomas, Princess; Seale, J. Paul; Johnson, J Aaron; Dhabliwala, Jason; Kitchens, Debra; Okosun, Ike S.; Stokes, Nathan A.; Ashley, Dennis.

In: American Surgeon, Vol. 82, No. 5, 01.05.2016, p. 468-473.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Thomas, P, Seale, JP, Johnson, JA, Dhabliwala, J, Kitchens, D, Okosun, IS, Stokes, NA & Ashley, D 2016, 'Impact of a quality improvement intervention to increase brief alcohol and drug interventions on a level i trauma service', American Surgeon, vol. 82, no. 5, pp. 468-473.
Thomas, Princess ; Seale, J. Paul ; Johnson, J Aaron ; Dhabliwala, Jason ; Kitchens, Debra ; Okosun, Ike S. ; Stokes, Nathan A. ; Ashley, Dennis. / Impact of a quality improvement intervention to increase brief alcohol and drug interventions on a level i trauma service. In: American Surgeon. 2016 ; Vol. 82, No. 5. pp. 468-473.
@article{692c47850ee748f583d8ccda8837f9d5,
title = "Impact of a quality improvement intervention to increase brief alcohol and drug interventions on a level i trauma service",
abstract = "Screening and brief intervention (SBI) decreases alcohol use and related consequences among trauma patients. Although SBI is required in Level I and II trauma centers, implementation often is difficult. This study used the Plan-Do-Study-Act approach to identify and implement measures to increase the number of patients receiving SBI at a Level I trauma center. A multidisciplinary Quality Improvement Committee with representation from the Trauma Service and SBI Team met monthly during 2011. Stepwise interventions included identifying a resident {"}champion{"} responsible for screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment, including an SBI report at monthly trauma conferences, and incorporating SBI into the trauma order set. Outcomes measures were number of patients screened, patients screening positive, and the number of patients receiving SBI. At baseline, 170 of 362 patients (47{\%}) were screened, 68/170 (40{\%}) had positive screens, and 30/68 (44{\%} of those with positive screens) received SBI services. Quarter 2 saw increases in patients screened - 275/437 (63{\%}), patients screening positive (106/275; 39{\%}) and those receiving SBI (60/106; 57{\%}). Increases culminated in Quarter 4 with screening 401/466 (86{\%}; P < 0.001) patients, 208/401 (52{\%}; P < 0.001) patients screening positive, and 114 patients (55{\%}; P = 0.296) receiving services. Use of similar quality improvement measures nationwide could improve rates of provision of this important service.",
author = "Princess Thomas and Seale, {J. Paul} and Johnson, {J Aaron} and Jason Dhabliwala and Debra Kitchens and Okosun, {Ike S.} and Stokes, {Nathan A.} and Dennis Ashley",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "82",
pages = "468--473",
journal = "American Surgeon",
issn = "0003-1348",
publisher = "Southeastern Surgical Congress",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of a quality improvement intervention to increase brief alcohol and drug interventions on a level i trauma service

AU - Thomas, Princess

AU - Seale, J. Paul

AU - Johnson, J Aaron

AU - Dhabliwala, Jason

AU - Kitchens, Debra

AU - Okosun, Ike S.

AU - Stokes, Nathan A.

AU - Ashley, Dennis

PY - 2016/5/1

Y1 - 2016/5/1

N2 - Screening and brief intervention (SBI) decreases alcohol use and related consequences among trauma patients. Although SBI is required in Level I and II trauma centers, implementation often is difficult. This study used the Plan-Do-Study-Act approach to identify and implement measures to increase the number of patients receiving SBI at a Level I trauma center. A multidisciplinary Quality Improvement Committee with representation from the Trauma Service and SBI Team met monthly during 2011. Stepwise interventions included identifying a resident "champion" responsible for screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment, including an SBI report at monthly trauma conferences, and incorporating SBI into the trauma order set. Outcomes measures were number of patients screened, patients screening positive, and the number of patients receiving SBI. At baseline, 170 of 362 patients (47%) were screened, 68/170 (40%) had positive screens, and 30/68 (44% of those with positive screens) received SBI services. Quarter 2 saw increases in patients screened - 275/437 (63%), patients screening positive (106/275; 39%) and those receiving SBI (60/106; 57%). Increases culminated in Quarter 4 with screening 401/466 (86%; P < 0.001) patients, 208/401 (52%; P < 0.001) patients screening positive, and 114 patients (55%; P = 0.296) receiving services. Use of similar quality improvement measures nationwide could improve rates of provision of this important service.

AB - Screening and brief intervention (SBI) decreases alcohol use and related consequences among trauma patients. Although SBI is required in Level I and II trauma centers, implementation often is difficult. This study used the Plan-Do-Study-Act approach to identify and implement measures to increase the number of patients receiving SBI at a Level I trauma center. A multidisciplinary Quality Improvement Committee with representation from the Trauma Service and SBI Team met monthly during 2011. Stepwise interventions included identifying a resident "champion" responsible for screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment, including an SBI report at monthly trauma conferences, and incorporating SBI into the trauma order set. Outcomes measures were number of patients screened, patients screening positive, and the number of patients receiving SBI. At baseline, 170 of 362 patients (47%) were screened, 68/170 (40%) had positive screens, and 30/68 (44% of those with positive screens) received SBI services. Quarter 2 saw increases in patients screened - 275/437 (63%), patients screening positive (106/275; 39%) and those receiving SBI (60/106; 57%). Increases culminated in Quarter 4 with screening 401/466 (86%; P < 0.001) patients, 208/401 (52%; P < 0.001) patients screening positive, and 114 patients (55%; P = 0.296) receiving services. Use of similar quality improvement measures nationwide could improve rates of provision of this important service.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84996489997&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84996489997&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 82

SP - 468

EP - 473

JO - American Surgeon

JF - American Surgeon

SN - 0003-1348

IS - 5

ER -