Impact of alternative footwear on human energy expenditure

Cody Edward Morris, Harish Chander, Samuel J. Wilson, Mark Loftin, Chip Wade, John C. Garner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: Use of alternative footwear options such as flip-flop style sandals and minimalist athletic shoes are becoming increasingly popular footwear choices. The purpose of the investigation was to analyze the energy expenditure and oxygen consumption requirements of walking at preferred pace while wearing flip-flops, slip-on style shoes, and minimalist athletic shoes. Methods: Eighteen healthy male adults participated in this study. In addition to an initial familiarization session, participants were tested in three different footwear conditions [thong-style flip-flops (FF), Croc® slip on shoes (CROC), and Vibram Fivefingers® minimalist shoes (MIN)]. Then after a brief warm-up, participants walked a one-mile distance at their preferred pace. Immediately following completion of the one-mile walk, participants stood quietly on the treadmill for an additional period to assess excess post-exercise oxygen consumption (EPOC). Results: A repeated-measures ANOVA that the following variables did not show evidence of a significant differently value between conditions: preferred pace (p = 0.392), average oxygen consumption (p = 0.804), energy expenditure per mile (p = 0.306), or EPOC (p = 0.088). There was shown to be a significantly higher RER during exercise in CROC compared to MIN (p = 0.031) with no significant differences observed when comparing CROC to FF (p = 0.106) or FF to MIN (p = 0.827). Conclusion: Based on the results of the current study, it appears that the alternative footwear selected for evaluation do not lead to a substantial alteration of walking pace or overall EE. However, the significant difference in RER suggesting a slightly elevated exercise intensity while wearing the CROC could perhaps be related to the softer sole, influencing overall mechanical efficiency.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1220-1229
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Human Sport and Exercise
Volume12
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Shoes
Energy Metabolism
Oxygen Consumption
Sports
Walking
Analysis of Variance

Keywords

  • Minimalist Footwear
  • Physical Activity
  • Slip-On Shoes
  • Walking

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Morris, C. E., Chander, H., Wilson, S. J., Loftin, M., Wade, C., & Garner, J. C. (2017). Impact of alternative footwear on human energy expenditure. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 12(4), 1220-1229. https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2017.124.08

Impact of alternative footwear on human energy expenditure. / Morris, Cody Edward; Chander, Harish; Wilson, Samuel J.; Loftin, Mark; Wade, Chip; Garner, John C.

In: Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, Vol. 12, No. 4, 01.01.2017, p. 1220-1229.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Morris, CE, Chander, H, Wilson, SJ, Loftin, M, Wade, C & Garner, JC 2017, 'Impact of alternative footwear on human energy expenditure', Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1220-1229. https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2017.124.08
Morris CE, Chander H, Wilson SJ, Loftin M, Wade C, Garner JC. Impact of alternative footwear on human energy expenditure. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise. 2017 Jan 1;12(4):1220-1229. https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2017.124.08
Morris, Cody Edward ; Chander, Harish ; Wilson, Samuel J. ; Loftin, Mark ; Wade, Chip ; Garner, John C. / Impact of alternative footwear on human energy expenditure. In: Journal of Human Sport and Exercise. 2017 ; Vol. 12, No. 4. pp. 1220-1229.
@article{e86216081e974b96aba275a743b553e7,
title = "Impact of alternative footwear on human energy expenditure",
abstract = "Purpose: Use of alternative footwear options such as flip-flop style sandals and minimalist athletic shoes are becoming increasingly popular footwear choices. The purpose of the investigation was to analyze the energy expenditure and oxygen consumption requirements of walking at preferred pace while wearing flip-flops, slip-on style shoes, and minimalist athletic shoes. Methods: Eighteen healthy male adults participated in this study. In addition to an initial familiarization session, participants were tested in three different footwear conditions [thong-style flip-flops (FF), Croc{\circledR} slip on shoes (CROC), and Vibram Fivefingers{\circledR} minimalist shoes (MIN)]. Then after a brief warm-up, participants walked a one-mile distance at their preferred pace. Immediately following completion of the one-mile walk, participants stood quietly on the treadmill for an additional period to assess excess post-exercise oxygen consumption (EPOC). Results: A repeated-measures ANOVA that the following variables did not show evidence of a significant differently value between conditions: preferred pace (p = 0.392), average oxygen consumption (p = 0.804), energy expenditure per mile (p = 0.306), or EPOC (p = 0.088). There was shown to be a significantly higher RER during exercise in CROC compared to MIN (p = 0.031) with no significant differences observed when comparing CROC to FF (p = 0.106) or FF to MIN (p = 0.827). Conclusion: Based on the results of the current study, it appears that the alternative footwear selected for evaluation do not lead to a substantial alteration of walking pace or overall EE. However, the significant difference in RER suggesting a slightly elevated exercise intensity while wearing the CROC could perhaps be related to the softer sole, influencing overall mechanical efficiency.",
keywords = "Minimalist Footwear, Physical Activity, Slip-On Shoes, Walking",
author = "Morris, {Cody Edward} and Harish Chander and Wilson, {Samuel J.} and Mark Loftin and Chip Wade and Garner, {John C.}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.14198/jhse.2017.124.08",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "1220--1229",
journal = "Journal of Human Sport and Exercise",
issn = "1988-5202",
publisher = "University of Alicante. Faculty of Education",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of alternative footwear on human energy expenditure

AU - Morris, Cody Edward

AU - Chander, Harish

AU - Wilson, Samuel J.

AU - Loftin, Mark

AU - Wade, Chip

AU - Garner, John C.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Purpose: Use of alternative footwear options such as flip-flop style sandals and minimalist athletic shoes are becoming increasingly popular footwear choices. The purpose of the investigation was to analyze the energy expenditure and oxygen consumption requirements of walking at preferred pace while wearing flip-flops, slip-on style shoes, and minimalist athletic shoes. Methods: Eighteen healthy male adults participated in this study. In addition to an initial familiarization session, participants were tested in three different footwear conditions [thong-style flip-flops (FF), Croc® slip on shoes (CROC), and Vibram Fivefingers® minimalist shoes (MIN)]. Then after a brief warm-up, participants walked a one-mile distance at their preferred pace. Immediately following completion of the one-mile walk, participants stood quietly on the treadmill for an additional period to assess excess post-exercise oxygen consumption (EPOC). Results: A repeated-measures ANOVA that the following variables did not show evidence of a significant differently value between conditions: preferred pace (p = 0.392), average oxygen consumption (p = 0.804), energy expenditure per mile (p = 0.306), or EPOC (p = 0.088). There was shown to be a significantly higher RER during exercise in CROC compared to MIN (p = 0.031) with no significant differences observed when comparing CROC to FF (p = 0.106) or FF to MIN (p = 0.827). Conclusion: Based on the results of the current study, it appears that the alternative footwear selected for evaluation do not lead to a substantial alteration of walking pace or overall EE. However, the significant difference in RER suggesting a slightly elevated exercise intensity while wearing the CROC could perhaps be related to the softer sole, influencing overall mechanical efficiency.

AB - Purpose: Use of alternative footwear options such as flip-flop style sandals and minimalist athletic shoes are becoming increasingly popular footwear choices. The purpose of the investigation was to analyze the energy expenditure and oxygen consumption requirements of walking at preferred pace while wearing flip-flops, slip-on style shoes, and minimalist athletic shoes. Methods: Eighteen healthy male adults participated in this study. In addition to an initial familiarization session, participants were tested in three different footwear conditions [thong-style flip-flops (FF), Croc® slip on shoes (CROC), and Vibram Fivefingers® minimalist shoes (MIN)]. Then after a brief warm-up, participants walked a one-mile distance at their preferred pace. Immediately following completion of the one-mile walk, participants stood quietly on the treadmill for an additional period to assess excess post-exercise oxygen consumption (EPOC). Results: A repeated-measures ANOVA that the following variables did not show evidence of a significant differently value between conditions: preferred pace (p = 0.392), average oxygen consumption (p = 0.804), energy expenditure per mile (p = 0.306), or EPOC (p = 0.088). There was shown to be a significantly higher RER during exercise in CROC compared to MIN (p = 0.031) with no significant differences observed when comparing CROC to FF (p = 0.106) or FF to MIN (p = 0.827). Conclusion: Based on the results of the current study, it appears that the alternative footwear selected for evaluation do not lead to a substantial alteration of walking pace or overall EE. However, the significant difference in RER suggesting a slightly elevated exercise intensity while wearing the CROC could perhaps be related to the softer sole, influencing overall mechanical efficiency.

KW - Minimalist Footwear

KW - Physical Activity

KW - Slip-On Shoes

KW - Walking

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038841192&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85038841192&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.14198/jhse.2017.124.08

DO - 10.14198/jhse.2017.124.08

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 1220

EP - 1229

JO - Journal of Human Sport and Exercise

JF - Journal of Human Sport and Exercise

SN - 1988-5202

IS - 4

ER -