Impact of group size on the effectiveness of a resuscitation simulation curriculum for medical students

Jessica Rezmer, Tomer Begaz, Robert Treat, Matthew C Tews

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Simulation requires involvement from participants. However, it is unknown to what extent simulation effectiveness is a function of the number of participants. Purpose: This study assessed the impact of varying group size on medical students' subjective experience of simulation and on postsimulation exam performance. Methods: Medical students were randomly assigned to groups of 2, 3, or 4. Retrospective assessment was done through a survey assessing confidence and knowledge as it relates to resuscitation and statements related to group size. Performance on a postsimulation exam was analyzed. Results: There were significant increases in students' confidence and knowledge following simulation. There were no significant differences in student perception of the effectiveness or realism of the simulation or in performance on the postsimulation exam as a function of group size. Conclusions: Students feel that simulation is an effective way to learn medical knowledge. Varying group size had no effect on students' subjective experience or exam performance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)251-255
Number of pages5
JournalTeaching and Learning in Medicine
Volume23
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 31 2011

Fingerprint

group size
Medical Students
Resuscitation
Curriculum
medical student
Students
curriculum
simulation
performance
student
confidence
realism
experience
Group

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Impact of group size on the effectiveness of a resuscitation simulation curriculum for medical students. / Rezmer, Jessica; Begaz, Tomer; Treat, Robert; Tews, Matthew C.

In: Teaching and Learning in Medicine, Vol. 23, No. 3, 31.10.2011, p. 251-255.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{71e6a2bc600d494799864ec0d1904792,
title = "Impact of group size on the effectiveness of a resuscitation simulation curriculum for medical students",
abstract = "Background: Simulation requires involvement from participants. However, it is unknown to what extent simulation effectiveness is a function of the number of participants. Purpose: This study assessed the impact of varying group size on medical students' subjective experience of simulation and on postsimulation exam performance. Methods: Medical students were randomly assigned to groups of 2, 3, or 4. Retrospective assessment was done through a survey assessing confidence and knowledge as it relates to resuscitation and statements related to group size. Performance on a postsimulation exam was analyzed. Results: There were significant increases in students' confidence and knowledge following simulation. There were no significant differences in student perception of the effectiveness or realism of the simulation or in performance on the postsimulation exam as a function of group size. Conclusions: Students feel that simulation is an effective way to learn medical knowledge. Varying group size had no effect on students' subjective experience or exam performance.",
author = "Jessica Rezmer and Tomer Begaz and Robert Treat and Tews, {Matthew C}",
year = "2011",
month = "10",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1080/10401334.2011.586920",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "251--255",
journal = "Teaching and Learning in Medicine",
issn = "1040-1334",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of group size on the effectiveness of a resuscitation simulation curriculum for medical students

AU - Rezmer, Jessica

AU - Begaz, Tomer

AU - Treat, Robert

AU - Tews, Matthew C

PY - 2011/10/31

Y1 - 2011/10/31

N2 - Background: Simulation requires involvement from participants. However, it is unknown to what extent simulation effectiveness is a function of the number of participants. Purpose: This study assessed the impact of varying group size on medical students' subjective experience of simulation and on postsimulation exam performance. Methods: Medical students were randomly assigned to groups of 2, 3, or 4. Retrospective assessment was done through a survey assessing confidence and knowledge as it relates to resuscitation and statements related to group size. Performance on a postsimulation exam was analyzed. Results: There were significant increases in students' confidence and knowledge following simulation. There were no significant differences in student perception of the effectiveness or realism of the simulation or in performance on the postsimulation exam as a function of group size. Conclusions: Students feel that simulation is an effective way to learn medical knowledge. Varying group size had no effect on students' subjective experience or exam performance.

AB - Background: Simulation requires involvement from participants. However, it is unknown to what extent simulation effectiveness is a function of the number of participants. Purpose: This study assessed the impact of varying group size on medical students' subjective experience of simulation and on postsimulation exam performance. Methods: Medical students were randomly assigned to groups of 2, 3, or 4. Retrospective assessment was done through a survey assessing confidence and knowledge as it relates to resuscitation and statements related to group size. Performance on a postsimulation exam was analyzed. Results: There were significant increases in students' confidence and knowledge following simulation. There were no significant differences in student perception of the effectiveness or realism of the simulation or in performance on the postsimulation exam as a function of group size. Conclusions: Students feel that simulation is an effective way to learn medical knowledge. Varying group size had no effect on students' subjective experience or exam performance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80054901440&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80054901440&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10401334.2011.586920

DO - 10.1080/10401334.2011.586920

M3 - Article

C2 - 21745060

AN - SCOPUS:80054901440

VL - 23

SP - 251

EP - 255

JO - Teaching and Learning in Medicine

JF - Teaching and Learning in Medicine

SN - 1040-1334

IS - 3

ER -