Impact of tennCare reform on care of patients with rheumatic diseases

Aliza Braverman, Baowei Tang, Jessica Cross, Syed Hasan Raza, Joseph P. Nesheiwat, Laura D Carbone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: As a consequence of costcutting changes, termed "TennCare reform," to Tennessee's state-funded health care plan, a number of beneficiaries have either had their benefits substantially reduced or have been disenrolled entirely. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of these reforms on the health of patients with chronic rheumatic diseases. Methods: We determined differences with adherence to scheduled appointments in an urban academic rheumatology clinic in the 3 months before and in the 3 months after TennCare reform. A telephone survey was conducted to determine plans for future rheumatic care among those patients scheduled to be seen in this clinic in the 3 months after TennCare reform. Results: Overall, 402 of the 601 patients scheduled for a rheumatology clinic appointment before TennCare reform (67%) adhered to their scheduled rheumatology appointment, compared with 362 of 595 patients (61%) scheduled for an appointment after TennCare reform, a difference that was statistically significant (P = 0.034). After TennCare reform, patients who did not adhere with clinic follow-up were more likely to have been disenrolled from TennCare (P < 0.001). By telephone survey, among those who were disenrolled from TennCare, almost half indicated that they did not know where they were going to receive future rheumatic disease care. Among those who retained TennCare, less than half indicated that they could afford to purchase all of their medications. Conclusions: TennCare reform has significantly limited care for patients with rheumatic diseases. The long-term consequences of this merit future study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)363-367
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of the Medical Sciences
Volume335
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Rheumatic Diseases
Patient Care
Appointments and Schedules
Rheumatology
Telephone
Chronic Disease
Delivery of Health Care
Health
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Rheumatic diseases
  • TennCare Reform

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Impact of tennCare reform on care of patients with rheumatic diseases. / Braverman, Aliza; Tang, Baowei; Cross, Jessica; Raza, Syed Hasan; Nesheiwat, Joseph P.; Carbone, Laura D.

In: American Journal of the Medical Sciences, Vol. 335, No. 5, 01.01.2008, p. 363-367.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Braverman, Aliza ; Tang, Baowei ; Cross, Jessica ; Raza, Syed Hasan ; Nesheiwat, Joseph P. ; Carbone, Laura D. / Impact of tennCare reform on care of patients with rheumatic diseases. In: American Journal of the Medical Sciences. 2008 ; Vol. 335, No. 5. pp. 363-367.
@article{23c402407e064f4eb21523db65bd0387,
title = "Impact of tennCare reform on care of patients with rheumatic diseases",
abstract = "Background: As a consequence of costcutting changes, termed {"}TennCare reform,{"} to Tennessee's state-funded health care plan, a number of beneficiaries have either had their benefits substantially reduced or have been disenrolled entirely. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of these reforms on the health of patients with chronic rheumatic diseases. Methods: We determined differences with adherence to scheduled appointments in an urban academic rheumatology clinic in the 3 months before and in the 3 months after TennCare reform. A telephone survey was conducted to determine plans for future rheumatic care among those patients scheduled to be seen in this clinic in the 3 months after TennCare reform. Results: Overall, 402 of the 601 patients scheduled for a rheumatology clinic appointment before TennCare reform (67{\%}) adhered to their scheduled rheumatology appointment, compared with 362 of 595 patients (61{\%}) scheduled for an appointment after TennCare reform, a difference that was statistically significant (P = 0.034). After TennCare reform, patients who did not adhere with clinic follow-up were more likely to have been disenrolled from TennCare (P < 0.001). By telephone survey, among those who were disenrolled from TennCare, almost half indicated that they did not know where they were going to receive future rheumatic disease care. Among those who retained TennCare, less than half indicated that they could afford to purchase all of their medications. Conclusions: TennCare reform has significantly limited care for patients with rheumatic diseases. The long-term consequences of this merit future study.",
keywords = "Rheumatic diseases, TennCare Reform",
author = "Aliza Braverman and Baowei Tang and Jessica Cross and Raza, {Syed Hasan} and Nesheiwat, {Joseph P.} and Carbone, {Laura D}",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/MAJ.0b013e31815ac511",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "335",
pages = "363--367",
journal = "American Journal of the Medical Sciences",
issn = "0002-9629",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of tennCare reform on care of patients with rheumatic diseases

AU - Braverman, Aliza

AU - Tang, Baowei

AU - Cross, Jessica

AU - Raza, Syed Hasan

AU - Nesheiwat, Joseph P.

AU - Carbone, Laura D

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - Background: As a consequence of costcutting changes, termed "TennCare reform," to Tennessee's state-funded health care plan, a number of beneficiaries have either had their benefits substantially reduced or have been disenrolled entirely. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of these reforms on the health of patients with chronic rheumatic diseases. Methods: We determined differences with adherence to scheduled appointments in an urban academic rheumatology clinic in the 3 months before and in the 3 months after TennCare reform. A telephone survey was conducted to determine plans for future rheumatic care among those patients scheduled to be seen in this clinic in the 3 months after TennCare reform. Results: Overall, 402 of the 601 patients scheduled for a rheumatology clinic appointment before TennCare reform (67%) adhered to their scheduled rheumatology appointment, compared with 362 of 595 patients (61%) scheduled for an appointment after TennCare reform, a difference that was statistically significant (P = 0.034). After TennCare reform, patients who did not adhere with clinic follow-up were more likely to have been disenrolled from TennCare (P < 0.001). By telephone survey, among those who were disenrolled from TennCare, almost half indicated that they did not know where they were going to receive future rheumatic disease care. Among those who retained TennCare, less than half indicated that they could afford to purchase all of their medications. Conclusions: TennCare reform has significantly limited care for patients with rheumatic diseases. The long-term consequences of this merit future study.

AB - Background: As a consequence of costcutting changes, termed "TennCare reform," to Tennessee's state-funded health care plan, a number of beneficiaries have either had their benefits substantially reduced or have been disenrolled entirely. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of these reforms on the health of patients with chronic rheumatic diseases. Methods: We determined differences with adherence to scheduled appointments in an urban academic rheumatology clinic in the 3 months before and in the 3 months after TennCare reform. A telephone survey was conducted to determine plans for future rheumatic care among those patients scheduled to be seen in this clinic in the 3 months after TennCare reform. Results: Overall, 402 of the 601 patients scheduled for a rheumatology clinic appointment before TennCare reform (67%) adhered to their scheduled rheumatology appointment, compared with 362 of 595 patients (61%) scheduled for an appointment after TennCare reform, a difference that was statistically significant (P = 0.034). After TennCare reform, patients who did not adhere with clinic follow-up were more likely to have been disenrolled from TennCare (P < 0.001). By telephone survey, among those who were disenrolled from TennCare, almost half indicated that they did not know where they were going to receive future rheumatic disease care. Among those who retained TennCare, less than half indicated that they could afford to purchase all of their medications. Conclusions: TennCare reform has significantly limited care for patients with rheumatic diseases. The long-term consequences of this merit future study.

KW - Rheumatic diseases

KW - TennCare Reform

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=45549095690&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=45549095690&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e31815ac511

DO - 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e31815ac511

M3 - Article

VL - 335

SP - 363

EP - 367

JO - American Journal of the Medical Sciences

JF - American Journal of the Medical Sciences

SN - 0002-9629

IS - 5

ER -