Impact of the quality of coronal restoration versus the quality of root canal fillings on success of root canal treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Brian M. Gillen, Stephen W. Looney, Li Sha Gu, Bethany A. Loushine, Roger N. Weller, Robert J. Loushine, David H. Pashley, Franklin R. Tay

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

100 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Thorough cleaning and shaping of root canals are essential for periapical healing. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth is also required for them to function and prevent coronal leakage. This study compared the impact of the quality of root canal treatment versus the quality of coronal restoration in treatment outcomes. Methods: Literature search was conducted using the search terms "coronal restoration," "root canal," "periapical status," and "quality." Articles that evaluated the effect of the quality of root filling and coronal restoration or both on the success of root canal treatment were selected. Nine articles were identified and were reviewed by 3 investigators. Data were collected based on predetermined criteria. Percentages of teeth without apical periodontitis were recorded for each category: adequate root canal treatment (AE), inadequate root canal treatment (IE), adequate restoration (AR), and inadequate restoration (IR). Data were analyzed using meta-analysis for odds ratios (ORs). Results: After adjusting for significant covariates to reduce heterogeneity, the results were combined to obtain pooled estimates of the common OR for the comparison of AR/AE versus AR/IE (OR = 2.734; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.61-2.88; P < .001) and AR/AE versus IR/AE (OR = 2.808; 95% CI, 2.64-2.97; P < .001). Conclusions: On the basis of the current best available evidence, the odds for healing of apical periodontitis increase with both adequate root canal treatment and adequate restorative treatment. Although poorer clinical outcomes may be expected with adequate root filling-inadequate coronal restoration and inadequate root filling-adequate coronal restoration, there is no significant difference in the odds of healing between these 2 combinations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)895-902
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Endodontics
Volume37
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2011

Fingerprint

Dental Pulp Cavity
Meta-Analysis
Odds Ratio
Periapical Periodontitis
Confidence Intervals
Nonvital Tooth
Tooth
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • Coronal restoration
  • meta-analysis
  • obturation
  • periapical status
  • quality
  • root canal treatment
  • systematic review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Impact of the quality of coronal restoration versus the quality of root canal fillings on success of root canal treatment : A systematic review and meta-analysis. / Gillen, Brian M.; Looney, Stephen W.; Gu, Li Sha; Loushine, Bethany A.; Weller, Roger N.; Loushine, Robert J.; Pashley, David H.; Tay, Franklin R.

In: Journal of Endodontics, Vol. 37, No. 7, 01.07.2011, p. 895-902.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Gillen, Brian M. ; Looney, Stephen W. ; Gu, Li Sha ; Loushine, Bethany A. ; Weller, Roger N. ; Loushine, Robert J. ; Pashley, David H. ; Tay, Franklin R. / Impact of the quality of coronal restoration versus the quality of root canal fillings on success of root canal treatment : A systematic review and meta-analysis. In: Journal of Endodontics. 2011 ; Vol. 37, No. 7. pp. 895-902.
@article{b5755540b083475daf62716a44dd2d91,
title = "Impact of the quality of coronal restoration versus the quality of root canal fillings on success of root canal treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis",
abstract = "Introduction: Thorough cleaning and shaping of root canals are essential for periapical healing. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth is also required for them to function and prevent coronal leakage. This study compared the impact of the quality of root canal treatment versus the quality of coronal restoration in treatment outcomes. Methods: Literature search was conducted using the search terms {"}coronal restoration,{"} {"}root canal,{"} {"}periapical status,{"} and {"}quality.{"} Articles that evaluated the effect of the quality of root filling and coronal restoration or both on the success of root canal treatment were selected. Nine articles were identified and were reviewed by 3 investigators. Data were collected based on predetermined criteria. Percentages of teeth without apical periodontitis were recorded for each category: adequate root canal treatment (AE), inadequate root canal treatment (IE), adequate restoration (AR), and inadequate restoration (IR). Data were analyzed using meta-analysis for odds ratios (ORs). Results: After adjusting for significant covariates to reduce heterogeneity, the results were combined to obtain pooled estimates of the common OR for the comparison of AR/AE versus AR/IE (OR = 2.734; 95{\%} confidence interval [CI], 2.61-2.88; P < .001) and AR/AE versus IR/AE (OR = 2.808; 95{\%} CI, 2.64-2.97; P < .001). Conclusions: On the basis of the current best available evidence, the odds for healing of apical periodontitis increase with both adequate root canal treatment and adequate restorative treatment. Although poorer clinical outcomes may be expected with adequate root filling-inadequate coronal restoration and inadequate root filling-adequate coronal restoration, there is no significant difference in the odds of healing between these 2 combinations.",
keywords = "Coronal restoration, meta-analysis, obturation, periapical status, quality, root canal treatment, systematic review",
author = "Gillen, {Brian M.} and Looney, {Stephen W.} and Gu, {Li Sha} and Loushine, {Bethany A.} and Weller, {Roger N.} and Loushine, {Robert J.} and Pashley, {David H.} and Tay, {Franklin R.}",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.joen.2011.04.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "895--902",
journal = "Journal of Endodontics",
issn = "0099-2399",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of the quality of coronal restoration versus the quality of root canal fillings on success of root canal treatment

T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis

AU - Gillen, Brian M.

AU - Looney, Stephen W.

AU - Gu, Li Sha

AU - Loushine, Bethany A.

AU - Weller, Roger N.

AU - Loushine, Robert J.

AU - Pashley, David H.

AU - Tay, Franklin R.

PY - 2011/7/1

Y1 - 2011/7/1

N2 - Introduction: Thorough cleaning and shaping of root canals are essential for periapical healing. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth is also required for them to function and prevent coronal leakage. This study compared the impact of the quality of root canal treatment versus the quality of coronal restoration in treatment outcomes. Methods: Literature search was conducted using the search terms "coronal restoration," "root canal," "periapical status," and "quality." Articles that evaluated the effect of the quality of root filling and coronal restoration or both on the success of root canal treatment were selected. Nine articles were identified and were reviewed by 3 investigators. Data were collected based on predetermined criteria. Percentages of teeth without apical periodontitis were recorded for each category: adequate root canal treatment (AE), inadequate root canal treatment (IE), adequate restoration (AR), and inadequate restoration (IR). Data were analyzed using meta-analysis for odds ratios (ORs). Results: After adjusting for significant covariates to reduce heterogeneity, the results were combined to obtain pooled estimates of the common OR for the comparison of AR/AE versus AR/IE (OR = 2.734; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.61-2.88; P < .001) and AR/AE versus IR/AE (OR = 2.808; 95% CI, 2.64-2.97; P < .001). Conclusions: On the basis of the current best available evidence, the odds for healing of apical periodontitis increase with both adequate root canal treatment and adequate restorative treatment. Although poorer clinical outcomes may be expected with adequate root filling-inadequate coronal restoration and inadequate root filling-adequate coronal restoration, there is no significant difference in the odds of healing between these 2 combinations.

AB - Introduction: Thorough cleaning and shaping of root canals are essential for periapical healing. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth is also required for them to function and prevent coronal leakage. This study compared the impact of the quality of root canal treatment versus the quality of coronal restoration in treatment outcomes. Methods: Literature search was conducted using the search terms "coronal restoration," "root canal," "periapical status," and "quality." Articles that evaluated the effect of the quality of root filling and coronal restoration or both on the success of root canal treatment were selected. Nine articles were identified and were reviewed by 3 investigators. Data were collected based on predetermined criteria. Percentages of teeth without apical periodontitis were recorded for each category: adequate root canal treatment (AE), inadequate root canal treatment (IE), adequate restoration (AR), and inadequate restoration (IR). Data were analyzed using meta-analysis for odds ratios (ORs). Results: After adjusting for significant covariates to reduce heterogeneity, the results were combined to obtain pooled estimates of the common OR for the comparison of AR/AE versus AR/IE (OR = 2.734; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.61-2.88; P < .001) and AR/AE versus IR/AE (OR = 2.808; 95% CI, 2.64-2.97; P < .001). Conclusions: On the basis of the current best available evidence, the odds for healing of apical periodontitis increase with both adequate root canal treatment and adequate restorative treatment. Although poorer clinical outcomes may be expected with adequate root filling-inadequate coronal restoration and inadequate root filling-adequate coronal restoration, there is no significant difference in the odds of healing between these 2 combinations.

KW - Coronal restoration

KW - meta-analysis

KW - obturation

KW - periapical status

KW - quality

KW - root canal treatment

KW - systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79959378511&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79959378511&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.joen.2011.04.002

DO - 10.1016/j.joen.2011.04.002

M3 - Review article

C2 - 21689541

AN - SCOPUS:79959378511

VL - 37

SP - 895

EP - 902

JO - Journal of Endodontics

JF - Journal of Endodontics

SN - 0099-2399

IS - 7

ER -