Implant drill characteristics: Thermal and mechanical effects of two-, three-, and four-fluted drills

Hyun Jun Oh, Beom Ik Kim, Hae Young Kim, In Sung Yeo, Ulf M.E. Wikesjö, Ki Tae Koo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Avoiding excessive trauma-thermal or otherwise-during dental implant site preparation is considered critical to implant success; overheating is considered to be a major cause of bone necrosis. Studies evaluating thermal and mechanical effects of implant drill design are limited, and effects of flute design have not been accounted for. The purpose of this study was to compare heat generation and cutting efficiency associated with two-, three-, and four-fluted implant drills to investigate the optimal number of flutes. Materials and Methods: Two-, three-, and four-fluted dental implant drills with identical point, relief, and rake angles and otherwise standard dimensions were evaluated. Real-time temperature changes while drilling artificial bone were recorded using an infrared thermal imager. Cutting efficiency was assessed as the drilling time to a 15-mm depth under constant load using a specially designed recording system. Each drill variation was examined 20 times. A one-way analysis of variance was used for statistical analysis. Results: Mean temperature increases amounted to 8.3°C, 10.8°C, and 15.1°C for two-, three-, and four-fluted drills, respectively; temperatures significantly increased (P <.001) with an increased number of flutes. Mean drilling time serving as a measure of cutting efficiency amounted to 2.6, 2.5, and 2.5 seconds for the two-, three-, and four-fluted drills, respectively. A trend of cutting efficiency increasing or decreasing according to the number of flutes was not observed. Differences in cutting efficiency among the three drill variations were statistically significant (P =.015). The cutting efficiency of the three-fluted drill was superior to that of the two-fluted drill (P =.016). Conclusion: Within the limitations of the study, a two-fluted drill would be preferred for osteotomy preparation due to its level of heat generation, whereas a three-fluted drill showed favorable cutting efficiency.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)483-488
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants
Volume32
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Mandrillus
Hot Temperature
Dental Implants
Temperature
Osteonecrosis
Osteotomy
Analysis of Variance
Bone and Bones

Keywords

  • Cutting efficiency
  • Drill geometry
  • Frictional heat
  • Implant drill design

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oral Surgery

Cite this

Implant drill characteristics : Thermal and mechanical effects of two-, three-, and four-fluted drills. / Oh, Hyun Jun; Kim, Beom Ik; Kim, Hae Young; Yeo, In Sung; Wikesjö, Ulf M.E.; Koo, Ki Tae.

In: International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, Vol. 32, No. 3, 01.01.2017, p. 483-488.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Oh, Hyun Jun ; Kim, Beom Ik ; Kim, Hae Young ; Yeo, In Sung ; Wikesjö, Ulf M.E. ; Koo, Ki Tae. / Implant drill characteristics : Thermal and mechanical effects of two-, three-, and four-fluted drills. In: International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. 2017 ; Vol. 32, No. 3. pp. 483-488.
@article{c8173d9e72904644ae5dee9b5eb3a583,
title = "Implant drill characteristics: Thermal and mechanical effects of two-, three-, and four-fluted drills",
abstract = "Purpose: Avoiding excessive trauma-thermal or otherwise-during dental implant site preparation is considered critical to implant success; overheating is considered to be a major cause of bone necrosis. Studies evaluating thermal and mechanical effects of implant drill design are limited, and effects of flute design have not been accounted for. The purpose of this study was to compare heat generation and cutting efficiency associated with two-, three-, and four-fluted implant drills to investigate the optimal number of flutes. Materials and Methods: Two-, three-, and four-fluted dental implant drills with identical point, relief, and rake angles and otherwise standard dimensions were evaluated. Real-time temperature changes while drilling artificial bone were recorded using an infrared thermal imager. Cutting efficiency was assessed as the drilling time to a 15-mm depth under constant load using a specially designed recording system. Each drill variation was examined 20 times. A one-way analysis of variance was used for statistical analysis. Results: Mean temperature increases amounted to 8.3°C, 10.8°C, and 15.1°C for two-, three-, and four-fluted drills, respectively; temperatures significantly increased (P <.001) with an increased number of flutes. Mean drilling time serving as a measure of cutting efficiency amounted to 2.6, 2.5, and 2.5 seconds for the two-, three-, and four-fluted drills, respectively. A trend of cutting efficiency increasing or decreasing according to the number of flutes was not observed. Differences in cutting efficiency among the three drill variations were statistically significant (P =.015). The cutting efficiency of the three-fluted drill was superior to that of the two-fluted drill (P =.016). Conclusion: Within the limitations of the study, a two-fluted drill would be preferred for osteotomy preparation due to its level of heat generation, whereas a three-fluted drill showed favorable cutting efficiency.",
keywords = "Cutting efficiency, Drill geometry, Frictional heat, Implant drill design",
author = "Oh, {Hyun Jun} and Kim, {Beom Ik} and Kim, {Hae Young} and Yeo, {In Sung} and Wikesj{\"o}, {Ulf M.E.} and Koo, {Ki Tae}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.11607/jomi.4819",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "483--488",
journal = "The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants",
issn = "0882-2786",
publisher = "Quintessence Publishing Company",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implant drill characteristics

T2 - Thermal and mechanical effects of two-, three-, and four-fluted drills

AU - Oh, Hyun Jun

AU - Kim, Beom Ik

AU - Kim, Hae Young

AU - Yeo, In Sung

AU - Wikesjö, Ulf M.E.

AU - Koo, Ki Tae

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Purpose: Avoiding excessive trauma-thermal or otherwise-during dental implant site preparation is considered critical to implant success; overheating is considered to be a major cause of bone necrosis. Studies evaluating thermal and mechanical effects of implant drill design are limited, and effects of flute design have not been accounted for. The purpose of this study was to compare heat generation and cutting efficiency associated with two-, three-, and four-fluted implant drills to investigate the optimal number of flutes. Materials and Methods: Two-, three-, and four-fluted dental implant drills with identical point, relief, and rake angles and otherwise standard dimensions were evaluated. Real-time temperature changes while drilling artificial bone were recorded using an infrared thermal imager. Cutting efficiency was assessed as the drilling time to a 15-mm depth under constant load using a specially designed recording system. Each drill variation was examined 20 times. A one-way analysis of variance was used for statistical analysis. Results: Mean temperature increases amounted to 8.3°C, 10.8°C, and 15.1°C for two-, three-, and four-fluted drills, respectively; temperatures significantly increased (P <.001) with an increased number of flutes. Mean drilling time serving as a measure of cutting efficiency amounted to 2.6, 2.5, and 2.5 seconds for the two-, three-, and four-fluted drills, respectively. A trend of cutting efficiency increasing or decreasing according to the number of flutes was not observed. Differences in cutting efficiency among the three drill variations were statistically significant (P =.015). The cutting efficiency of the three-fluted drill was superior to that of the two-fluted drill (P =.016). Conclusion: Within the limitations of the study, a two-fluted drill would be preferred for osteotomy preparation due to its level of heat generation, whereas a three-fluted drill showed favorable cutting efficiency.

AB - Purpose: Avoiding excessive trauma-thermal or otherwise-during dental implant site preparation is considered critical to implant success; overheating is considered to be a major cause of bone necrosis. Studies evaluating thermal and mechanical effects of implant drill design are limited, and effects of flute design have not been accounted for. The purpose of this study was to compare heat generation and cutting efficiency associated with two-, three-, and four-fluted implant drills to investigate the optimal number of flutes. Materials and Methods: Two-, three-, and four-fluted dental implant drills with identical point, relief, and rake angles and otherwise standard dimensions were evaluated. Real-time temperature changes while drilling artificial bone were recorded using an infrared thermal imager. Cutting efficiency was assessed as the drilling time to a 15-mm depth under constant load using a specially designed recording system. Each drill variation was examined 20 times. A one-way analysis of variance was used for statistical analysis. Results: Mean temperature increases amounted to 8.3°C, 10.8°C, and 15.1°C for two-, three-, and four-fluted drills, respectively; temperatures significantly increased (P <.001) with an increased number of flutes. Mean drilling time serving as a measure of cutting efficiency amounted to 2.6, 2.5, and 2.5 seconds for the two-, three-, and four-fluted drills, respectively. A trend of cutting efficiency increasing or decreasing according to the number of flutes was not observed. Differences in cutting efficiency among the three drill variations were statistically significant (P =.015). The cutting efficiency of the three-fluted drill was superior to that of the two-fluted drill (P =.016). Conclusion: Within the limitations of the study, a two-fluted drill would be preferred for osteotomy preparation due to its level of heat generation, whereas a three-fluted drill showed favorable cutting efficiency.

KW - Cutting efficiency

KW - Drill geometry

KW - Frictional heat

KW - Implant drill design

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019862327&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019862327&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.11607/jomi.4819

DO - 10.11607/jomi.4819

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85019862327

VL - 32

SP - 483

EP - 488

JO - The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants

JF - The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants

SN - 0882-2786

IS - 3

ER -