Implant site assessment using panoramic cross-sectional tomographic imaging

Brad J. Potter, Michael K. Shrout, Carl M. Russell, Mohamed M.H. Sharawy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of two different panoramic imaging systems to produce crosssectional images with accurate vertical dimensions of the posterior mandible. Study design. Three partially edentulous human cadaver mandibles were used for this study. On each mandible, three potential implant sites were arbitrarily identified in an area between the mental foramen and the ascending ramus. Each site was imaged using two different panoramic machines. Using each image, the mandible's outline, cortical thickness, and position of the mandibular canal were traced on clear acetate film. The mandibles were then sectioned at each site to serve as a gold standard. The cadaver sections and tracings (corrected for magnification) were measured, recording the overall mandibular height, distance from the crest of the ridge to the superior aspect of the mandibular canal, and the thickness of the cortical bone at the most inferior aspect of the mandible. Results. There were no significant differences between either of the system's image measures and the gold standard when considering the distance between the crest and the mandibular canal. Differences were noted between the systems measures and the gold standard in the assessment of the cortical bone thickness and the overall mandibular height. Conclusions. Both imaging systems can be useful for vertical measurements of a potential implant site in the posterior mandible.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)436-442
Number of pages7
JournalOral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics
Volume84
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1997

Fingerprint

Mandible
Cadaver
Vertical Dimension
Acetates

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Oral Surgery
  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Implant site assessment using panoramic cross-sectional tomographic imaging. / Potter, Brad J.; Shrout, Michael K.; Russell, Carl M.; Sharawy, Mohamed M.H.

In: Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics, Vol. 84, No. 4, 01.01.1997, p. 436-442.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0c41de903f984971867e3216d7d8a155,
title = "Implant site assessment using panoramic cross-sectional tomographic imaging",
abstract = "Objectives. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of two different panoramic imaging systems to produce crosssectional images with accurate vertical dimensions of the posterior mandible. Study design. Three partially edentulous human cadaver mandibles were used for this study. On each mandible, three potential implant sites were arbitrarily identified in an area between the mental foramen and the ascending ramus. Each site was imaged using two different panoramic machines. Using each image, the mandible's outline, cortical thickness, and position of the mandibular canal were traced on clear acetate film. The mandibles were then sectioned at each site to serve as a gold standard. The cadaver sections and tracings (corrected for magnification) were measured, recording the overall mandibular height, distance from the crest of the ridge to the superior aspect of the mandibular canal, and the thickness of the cortical bone at the most inferior aspect of the mandible. Results. There were no significant differences between either of the system's image measures and the gold standard when considering the distance between the crest and the mandibular canal. Differences were noted between the systems measures and the gold standard in the assessment of the cortical bone thickness and the overall mandibular height. Conclusions. Both imaging systems can be useful for vertical measurements of a potential implant site in the posterior mandible.",
author = "Potter, {Brad J.} and Shrout, {Michael K.} and Russell, {Carl M.} and Sharawy, {Mohamed M.H.}",
year = "1997",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S1079-2104(97)90045-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "84",
pages = "436--442",
journal = "Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology",
issn = "2212-4403",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implant site assessment using panoramic cross-sectional tomographic imaging

AU - Potter, Brad J.

AU - Shrout, Michael K.

AU - Russell, Carl M.

AU - Sharawy, Mohamed M.H.

PY - 1997/1/1

Y1 - 1997/1/1

N2 - Objectives. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of two different panoramic imaging systems to produce crosssectional images with accurate vertical dimensions of the posterior mandible. Study design. Three partially edentulous human cadaver mandibles were used for this study. On each mandible, three potential implant sites were arbitrarily identified in an area between the mental foramen and the ascending ramus. Each site was imaged using two different panoramic machines. Using each image, the mandible's outline, cortical thickness, and position of the mandibular canal were traced on clear acetate film. The mandibles were then sectioned at each site to serve as a gold standard. The cadaver sections and tracings (corrected for magnification) were measured, recording the overall mandibular height, distance from the crest of the ridge to the superior aspect of the mandibular canal, and the thickness of the cortical bone at the most inferior aspect of the mandible. Results. There were no significant differences between either of the system's image measures and the gold standard when considering the distance between the crest and the mandibular canal. Differences were noted between the systems measures and the gold standard in the assessment of the cortical bone thickness and the overall mandibular height. Conclusions. Both imaging systems can be useful for vertical measurements of a potential implant site in the posterior mandible.

AB - Objectives. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of two different panoramic imaging systems to produce crosssectional images with accurate vertical dimensions of the posterior mandible. Study design. Three partially edentulous human cadaver mandibles were used for this study. On each mandible, three potential implant sites were arbitrarily identified in an area between the mental foramen and the ascending ramus. Each site was imaged using two different panoramic machines. Using each image, the mandible's outline, cortical thickness, and position of the mandibular canal were traced on clear acetate film. The mandibles were then sectioned at each site to serve as a gold standard. The cadaver sections and tracings (corrected for magnification) were measured, recording the overall mandibular height, distance from the crest of the ridge to the superior aspect of the mandibular canal, and the thickness of the cortical bone at the most inferior aspect of the mandible. Results. There were no significant differences between either of the system's image measures and the gold standard when considering the distance between the crest and the mandibular canal. Differences were noted between the systems measures and the gold standard in the assessment of the cortical bone thickness and the overall mandibular height. Conclusions. Both imaging systems can be useful for vertical measurements of a potential implant site in the posterior mandible.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031255118&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031255118&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S1079-2104(97)90045-7

DO - 10.1016/S1079-2104(97)90045-7

M3 - Article

C2 - 9347511

AN - SCOPUS:0031255118

VL - 84

SP - 436

EP - 442

JO - Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology

JF - Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology

SN - 2212-4403

IS - 4

ER -