Improving hospital quality and costs in nonoperative traumatic brain injury the role of acute care surgeons

Bellal Joseph, Viraj Pandit, Ansab A. Haider, Narong Kulvatunyou, Bardiya Zangbar, Andrew Tang, Hassan Aziz, Gary Vercruysse, Terence OKeeffe, Randall S. Freise, Peter Rhee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

IMPORTANCE The role of acute care surgeons is evolving; however, no guidelines exist for the selective treatment of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) exclusively by acute care surgeons.We implemented the Brain Injury Guidelines (BIG) for managing TBI at our institution on March 1, 2012. OBJECTIVE To compare the outcomes in patients with TBI before and after implementation of the BIG protocol. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We conducted a 2-year analysis of our prospectively maintained database of all patients with TBI (findings of skull fracture and/or intracranial hemorrhage on an initial computed tomographic scan of the head) who presented to our level I trauma center. The pre-BIG group included patients with TBI from March 1, 2011, through February 29, 2012, and the post-BIG group included patients from July 1, 2012, through June 30, 2013. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome measureswere patients with repeated computed tomography of the head and neurosurgical consultations. Secondary outcome measures were findings of progression of intracranial hemorrhage on repeated computed tomographic scans, neurosurgical intervention, hospital admission, intensive care unit admission, hospital and intensive care unit length of stay, 30-day readmission rate, and hospital costs per patient. RESULTS A total of 796 patients (415 in the pre-BIG group and 381 in the post-BIG group)were included. Therewas a significant reduction (19.0%) in the rate of neurosurgical consultation (post-BIG group, 273 patients [71.7%]; pre-BIG group, 376 [90.6%]; P < .001), repeated computed tomography of the head (post-BIG group, 255 patients [66.9%]; pre-BIG group, 381 patients [91.8%]; P < .001), hospital (post-BIG group, 330 [86.6%]; pre-BIG group, 398 [95.9%]; P < .001) and intensive care unit admission (post-BIG group, 202 [53.0%]; pre-BIG group, 257 [61.9%]; P = .01), hospital length of stay (post-BIG group, 5.4 [4.5] days; pre-BIG group, 6.1 [4.8] days; P = .03), and hospital costs per patient ($4772 per patient; P = .03) with implementation of BIG. Therewas no difference in the in-hospital mortality rate (post-BIG group, 62 patients [16.3%]; pre-BIG group, 69 patients [16.6%]; P = .89), progression of intracranial hemorrhage on repeated scans (post-BIG group, 41 patients [10.8%]; pre-BIG group, 59 patients [14.2%]; P = .14), neurosurgical intervention (post-BIG group, 61 patients [16.0%]; pre-BIG group, 59 patients [14.2%]; P = .48), and 30-day readmission rate (post-BIG group, 31 patients [8.1%]; pre-BIG group, 37 patients [8.9%]; P = .69) after implementation of BIG. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Implementation of BIG is safe and cost-effective. BIG defines the management of TBI without the need for neurosurgical consultation and unnecessary imaging. Establishing a national, multi-institutional study implementing the BIG protocol is warranted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)866-872
Number of pages7
JournalJAMA Surgery
Volume150
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Hospital Costs
Brain Injuries
Guidelines
Traumatic Brain Injury
Surgeons
Intracranial Hemorrhages
Intensive Care Units
Length of Stay
Referral and Consultation
Head

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Joseph, B., Pandit, V., Haider, A. A., Kulvatunyou, N., Zangbar, B., Tang, A., ... Rhee, P. (2015). Improving hospital quality and costs in nonoperative traumatic brain injury the role of acute care surgeons. JAMA Surgery, 150(9), 866-872. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2015.1134

Improving hospital quality and costs in nonoperative traumatic brain injury the role of acute care surgeons. / Joseph, Bellal; Pandit, Viraj; Haider, Ansab A.; Kulvatunyou, Narong; Zangbar, Bardiya; Tang, Andrew; Aziz, Hassan; Vercruysse, Gary; OKeeffe, Terence; Freise, Randall S.; Rhee, Peter.

In: JAMA Surgery, Vol. 150, No. 9, 01.09.2015, p. 866-872.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Joseph, B, Pandit, V, Haider, AA, Kulvatunyou, N, Zangbar, B, Tang, A, Aziz, H, Vercruysse, G, OKeeffe, T, Freise, RS & Rhee, P 2015, 'Improving hospital quality and costs in nonoperative traumatic brain injury the role of acute care surgeons', JAMA Surgery, vol. 150, no. 9, pp. 866-872. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2015.1134
Joseph, Bellal ; Pandit, Viraj ; Haider, Ansab A. ; Kulvatunyou, Narong ; Zangbar, Bardiya ; Tang, Andrew ; Aziz, Hassan ; Vercruysse, Gary ; OKeeffe, Terence ; Freise, Randall S. ; Rhee, Peter. / Improving hospital quality and costs in nonoperative traumatic brain injury the role of acute care surgeons. In: JAMA Surgery. 2015 ; Vol. 150, No. 9. pp. 866-872.
@article{979c0f330ee94e98b75a5800187cc386,
title = "Improving hospital quality and costs in nonoperative traumatic brain injury the role of acute care surgeons",
abstract = "IMPORTANCE The role of acute care surgeons is evolving; however, no guidelines exist for the selective treatment of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) exclusively by acute care surgeons.We implemented the Brain Injury Guidelines (BIG) for managing TBI at our institution on March 1, 2012. OBJECTIVE To compare the outcomes in patients with TBI before and after implementation of the BIG protocol. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We conducted a 2-year analysis of our prospectively maintained database of all patients with TBI (findings of skull fracture and/or intracranial hemorrhage on an initial computed tomographic scan of the head) who presented to our level I trauma center. The pre-BIG group included patients with TBI from March 1, 2011, through February 29, 2012, and the post-BIG group included patients from July 1, 2012, through June 30, 2013. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome measureswere patients with repeated computed tomography of the head and neurosurgical consultations. Secondary outcome measures were findings of progression of intracranial hemorrhage on repeated computed tomographic scans, neurosurgical intervention, hospital admission, intensive care unit admission, hospital and intensive care unit length of stay, 30-day readmission rate, and hospital costs per patient. RESULTS A total of 796 patients (415 in the pre-BIG group and 381 in the post-BIG group)were included. Therewas a significant reduction (19.0{\%}) in the rate of neurosurgical consultation (post-BIG group, 273 patients [71.7{\%}]; pre-BIG group, 376 [90.6{\%}]; P < .001), repeated computed tomography of the head (post-BIG group, 255 patients [66.9{\%}]; pre-BIG group, 381 patients [91.8{\%}]; P < .001), hospital (post-BIG group, 330 [86.6{\%}]; pre-BIG group, 398 [95.9{\%}]; P < .001) and intensive care unit admission (post-BIG group, 202 [53.0{\%}]; pre-BIG group, 257 [61.9{\%}]; P = .01), hospital length of stay (post-BIG group, 5.4 [4.5] days; pre-BIG group, 6.1 [4.8] days; P = .03), and hospital costs per patient ($4772 per patient; P = .03) with implementation of BIG. Therewas no difference in the in-hospital mortality rate (post-BIG group, 62 patients [16.3{\%}]; pre-BIG group, 69 patients [16.6{\%}]; P = .89), progression of intracranial hemorrhage on repeated scans (post-BIG group, 41 patients [10.8{\%}]; pre-BIG group, 59 patients [14.2{\%}]; P = .14), neurosurgical intervention (post-BIG group, 61 patients [16.0{\%}]; pre-BIG group, 59 patients [14.2{\%}]; P = .48), and 30-day readmission rate (post-BIG group, 31 patients [8.1{\%}]; pre-BIG group, 37 patients [8.9{\%}]; P = .69) after implementation of BIG. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Implementation of BIG is safe and cost-effective. BIG defines the management of TBI without the need for neurosurgical consultation and unnecessary imaging. Establishing a national, multi-institutional study implementing the BIG protocol is warranted.",
author = "Bellal Joseph and Viraj Pandit and Haider, {Ansab A.} and Narong Kulvatunyou and Bardiya Zangbar and Andrew Tang and Hassan Aziz and Gary Vercruysse and Terence OKeeffe and Freise, {Randall S.} and Peter Rhee",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1001/jamasurg.2015.1134",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "150",
pages = "866--872",
journal = "JAMA Surgery",
issn = "2168-6254",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improving hospital quality and costs in nonoperative traumatic brain injury the role of acute care surgeons

AU - Joseph, Bellal

AU - Pandit, Viraj

AU - Haider, Ansab A.

AU - Kulvatunyou, Narong

AU - Zangbar, Bardiya

AU - Tang, Andrew

AU - Aziz, Hassan

AU - Vercruysse, Gary

AU - OKeeffe, Terence

AU - Freise, Randall S.

AU - Rhee, Peter

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - IMPORTANCE The role of acute care surgeons is evolving; however, no guidelines exist for the selective treatment of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) exclusively by acute care surgeons.We implemented the Brain Injury Guidelines (BIG) for managing TBI at our institution on March 1, 2012. OBJECTIVE To compare the outcomes in patients with TBI before and after implementation of the BIG protocol. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We conducted a 2-year analysis of our prospectively maintained database of all patients with TBI (findings of skull fracture and/or intracranial hemorrhage on an initial computed tomographic scan of the head) who presented to our level I trauma center. The pre-BIG group included patients with TBI from March 1, 2011, through February 29, 2012, and the post-BIG group included patients from July 1, 2012, through June 30, 2013. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome measureswere patients with repeated computed tomography of the head and neurosurgical consultations. Secondary outcome measures were findings of progression of intracranial hemorrhage on repeated computed tomographic scans, neurosurgical intervention, hospital admission, intensive care unit admission, hospital and intensive care unit length of stay, 30-day readmission rate, and hospital costs per patient. RESULTS A total of 796 patients (415 in the pre-BIG group and 381 in the post-BIG group)were included. Therewas a significant reduction (19.0%) in the rate of neurosurgical consultation (post-BIG group, 273 patients [71.7%]; pre-BIG group, 376 [90.6%]; P < .001), repeated computed tomography of the head (post-BIG group, 255 patients [66.9%]; pre-BIG group, 381 patients [91.8%]; P < .001), hospital (post-BIG group, 330 [86.6%]; pre-BIG group, 398 [95.9%]; P < .001) and intensive care unit admission (post-BIG group, 202 [53.0%]; pre-BIG group, 257 [61.9%]; P = .01), hospital length of stay (post-BIG group, 5.4 [4.5] days; pre-BIG group, 6.1 [4.8] days; P = .03), and hospital costs per patient ($4772 per patient; P = .03) with implementation of BIG. Therewas no difference in the in-hospital mortality rate (post-BIG group, 62 patients [16.3%]; pre-BIG group, 69 patients [16.6%]; P = .89), progression of intracranial hemorrhage on repeated scans (post-BIG group, 41 patients [10.8%]; pre-BIG group, 59 patients [14.2%]; P = .14), neurosurgical intervention (post-BIG group, 61 patients [16.0%]; pre-BIG group, 59 patients [14.2%]; P = .48), and 30-day readmission rate (post-BIG group, 31 patients [8.1%]; pre-BIG group, 37 patients [8.9%]; P = .69) after implementation of BIG. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Implementation of BIG is safe and cost-effective. BIG defines the management of TBI without the need for neurosurgical consultation and unnecessary imaging. Establishing a national, multi-institutional study implementing the BIG protocol is warranted.

AB - IMPORTANCE The role of acute care surgeons is evolving; however, no guidelines exist for the selective treatment of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) exclusively by acute care surgeons.We implemented the Brain Injury Guidelines (BIG) for managing TBI at our institution on March 1, 2012. OBJECTIVE To compare the outcomes in patients with TBI before and after implementation of the BIG protocol. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We conducted a 2-year analysis of our prospectively maintained database of all patients with TBI (findings of skull fracture and/or intracranial hemorrhage on an initial computed tomographic scan of the head) who presented to our level I trauma center. The pre-BIG group included patients with TBI from March 1, 2011, through February 29, 2012, and the post-BIG group included patients from July 1, 2012, through June 30, 2013. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome measureswere patients with repeated computed tomography of the head and neurosurgical consultations. Secondary outcome measures were findings of progression of intracranial hemorrhage on repeated computed tomographic scans, neurosurgical intervention, hospital admission, intensive care unit admission, hospital and intensive care unit length of stay, 30-day readmission rate, and hospital costs per patient. RESULTS A total of 796 patients (415 in the pre-BIG group and 381 in the post-BIG group)were included. Therewas a significant reduction (19.0%) in the rate of neurosurgical consultation (post-BIG group, 273 patients [71.7%]; pre-BIG group, 376 [90.6%]; P < .001), repeated computed tomography of the head (post-BIG group, 255 patients [66.9%]; pre-BIG group, 381 patients [91.8%]; P < .001), hospital (post-BIG group, 330 [86.6%]; pre-BIG group, 398 [95.9%]; P < .001) and intensive care unit admission (post-BIG group, 202 [53.0%]; pre-BIG group, 257 [61.9%]; P = .01), hospital length of stay (post-BIG group, 5.4 [4.5] days; pre-BIG group, 6.1 [4.8] days; P = .03), and hospital costs per patient ($4772 per patient; P = .03) with implementation of BIG. Therewas no difference in the in-hospital mortality rate (post-BIG group, 62 patients [16.3%]; pre-BIG group, 69 patients [16.6%]; P = .89), progression of intracranial hemorrhage on repeated scans (post-BIG group, 41 patients [10.8%]; pre-BIG group, 59 patients [14.2%]; P = .14), neurosurgical intervention (post-BIG group, 61 patients [16.0%]; pre-BIG group, 59 patients [14.2%]; P = .48), and 30-day readmission rate (post-BIG group, 31 patients [8.1%]; pre-BIG group, 37 patients [8.9%]; P = .69) after implementation of BIG. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Implementation of BIG is safe and cost-effective. BIG defines the management of TBI without the need for neurosurgical consultation and unnecessary imaging. Establishing a national, multi-institutional study implementing the BIG protocol is warranted.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942018741&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84942018741&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.1134

DO - 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.1134

M3 - Article

VL - 150

SP - 866

EP - 872

JO - JAMA Surgery

JF - JAMA Surgery

SN - 2168-6254

IS - 9

ER -