Improving inpatient venous thromboembolism prophylaxis

Glenn C. Shedd, Christine Franklin, Autumn M. Schumacher, Dale E. Green

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:: The number and types of inpatients given inadequate prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism (VTE) are not known; patients receive less than appropriate prophylaxis with some frequency. METHODS:: Initially we evaluated VTE prophylaxis at a community hospital by comparing prophylaxis patterns in adult inpatients for whom some prophylaxis was indicated. Patients were categorized as medical, general surgery, and orthopedic, then categorized as appropriate, suboptimal, or none in terms of VTE prophylaxis. After initial data collection, we performed an intervention on medical patients using a VTE risk assessment tool; a printed evaluation containing the VTE risk assessment score with related VTE prophylaxis regimens was placed in the patients' charts, after which prophylaxis patterns were compared between preintervention and postintervention medical patients. RESULTS:: Initial data collected from 116 medical, 110 general surgery, and 72 orthopedic patients (n ≤ 298) showed that there was a significant association between diagnosis category and level of observed appropriate VTE prophylaxis (P < 0.0001). Fifty-six medical patients (48%) received no prophylaxis, compared to 40 (36%) general surgery patients and 12 (17%) orthopedic patients. In the second phase, 74 medical patients on whom the intervention was performed were compared to 116 preintervention medical patients (n ≤ 190). The findings showed that intervention status had a significant association with level of appropriate VTE prophylaxis (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION:: An increase in appropriate VTE prophylaxis was observed after a system-level intervention.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1209-1215
Number of pages7
JournalSouthern Medical Journal
Volume101
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2008

Fingerprint

Venous Thromboembolism
Inpatients
Orthopedics
Community Hospital

Keywords

  • Prevention
  • Prophylaxis
  • Risk factors
  • Venous thromboembolism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Shedd, G. C., Franklin, C., Schumacher, A. M., & Green, D. E. (2008). Improving inpatient venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. Southern Medical Journal, 101(12), 1209-1215. https://doi.org/10.1097/SMJ.0b013e31818da7e7

Improving inpatient venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. / Shedd, Glenn C.; Franklin, Christine; Schumacher, Autumn M.; Green, Dale E.

In: Southern Medical Journal, Vol. 101, No. 12, 01.12.2008, p. 1209-1215.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shedd, GC, Franklin, C, Schumacher, AM & Green, DE 2008, 'Improving inpatient venous thromboembolism prophylaxis', Southern Medical Journal, vol. 101, no. 12, pp. 1209-1215. https://doi.org/10.1097/SMJ.0b013e31818da7e7
Shedd, Glenn C. ; Franklin, Christine ; Schumacher, Autumn M. ; Green, Dale E. / Improving inpatient venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. In: Southern Medical Journal. 2008 ; Vol. 101, No. 12. pp. 1209-1215.
@article{208481b6512742da87ebca0d9b2df50f,
title = "Improving inpatient venous thromboembolism prophylaxis",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES:: The number and types of inpatients given inadequate prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism (VTE) are not known; patients receive less than appropriate prophylaxis with some frequency. METHODS:: Initially we evaluated VTE prophylaxis at a community hospital by comparing prophylaxis patterns in adult inpatients for whom some prophylaxis was indicated. Patients were categorized as medical, general surgery, and orthopedic, then categorized as appropriate, suboptimal, or none in terms of VTE prophylaxis. After initial data collection, we performed an intervention on medical patients using a VTE risk assessment tool; a printed evaluation containing the VTE risk assessment score with related VTE prophylaxis regimens was placed in the patients' charts, after which prophylaxis patterns were compared between preintervention and postintervention medical patients. RESULTS:: Initial data collected from 116 medical, 110 general surgery, and 72 orthopedic patients (n ≤ 298) showed that there was a significant association between diagnosis category and level of observed appropriate VTE prophylaxis (P < 0.0001). Fifty-six medical patients (48{\%}) received no prophylaxis, compared to 40 (36{\%}) general surgery patients and 12 (17{\%}) orthopedic patients. In the second phase, 74 medical patients on whom the intervention was performed were compared to 116 preintervention medical patients (n ≤ 190). The findings showed that intervention status had a significant association with level of appropriate VTE prophylaxis (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION:: An increase in appropriate VTE prophylaxis was observed after a system-level intervention.",
keywords = "Prevention, Prophylaxis, Risk factors, Venous thromboembolism",
author = "Shedd, {Glenn C.} and Christine Franklin and Schumacher, {Autumn M.} and Green, {Dale E.}",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/SMJ.0b013e31818da7e7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "101",
pages = "1209--1215",
journal = "Southern Medical Journal",
issn = "0038-4348",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improving inpatient venous thromboembolism prophylaxis

AU - Shedd, Glenn C.

AU - Franklin, Christine

AU - Schumacher, Autumn M.

AU - Green, Dale E.

PY - 2008/12/1

Y1 - 2008/12/1

N2 - OBJECTIVES:: The number and types of inpatients given inadequate prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism (VTE) are not known; patients receive less than appropriate prophylaxis with some frequency. METHODS:: Initially we evaluated VTE prophylaxis at a community hospital by comparing prophylaxis patterns in adult inpatients for whom some prophylaxis was indicated. Patients were categorized as medical, general surgery, and orthopedic, then categorized as appropriate, suboptimal, or none in terms of VTE prophylaxis. After initial data collection, we performed an intervention on medical patients using a VTE risk assessment tool; a printed evaluation containing the VTE risk assessment score with related VTE prophylaxis regimens was placed in the patients' charts, after which prophylaxis patterns were compared between preintervention and postintervention medical patients. RESULTS:: Initial data collected from 116 medical, 110 general surgery, and 72 orthopedic patients (n ≤ 298) showed that there was a significant association between diagnosis category and level of observed appropriate VTE prophylaxis (P < 0.0001). Fifty-six medical patients (48%) received no prophylaxis, compared to 40 (36%) general surgery patients and 12 (17%) orthopedic patients. In the second phase, 74 medical patients on whom the intervention was performed were compared to 116 preintervention medical patients (n ≤ 190). The findings showed that intervention status had a significant association with level of appropriate VTE prophylaxis (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION:: An increase in appropriate VTE prophylaxis was observed after a system-level intervention.

AB - OBJECTIVES:: The number and types of inpatients given inadequate prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism (VTE) are not known; patients receive less than appropriate prophylaxis with some frequency. METHODS:: Initially we evaluated VTE prophylaxis at a community hospital by comparing prophylaxis patterns in adult inpatients for whom some prophylaxis was indicated. Patients were categorized as medical, general surgery, and orthopedic, then categorized as appropriate, suboptimal, or none in terms of VTE prophylaxis. After initial data collection, we performed an intervention on medical patients using a VTE risk assessment tool; a printed evaluation containing the VTE risk assessment score with related VTE prophylaxis regimens was placed in the patients' charts, after which prophylaxis patterns were compared between preintervention and postintervention medical patients. RESULTS:: Initial data collected from 116 medical, 110 general surgery, and 72 orthopedic patients (n ≤ 298) showed that there was a significant association between diagnosis category and level of observed appropriate VTE prophylaxis (P < 0.0001). Fifty-six medical patients (48%) received no prophylaxis, compared to 40 (36%) general surgery patients and 12 (17%) orthopedic patients. In the second phase, 74 medical patients on whom the intervention was performed were compared to 116 preintervention medical patients (n ≤ 190). The findings showed that intervention status had a significant association with level of appropriate VTE prophylaxis (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION:: An increase in appropriate VTE prophylaxis was observed after a system-level intervention.

KW - Prevention

KW - Prophylaxis

KW - Risk factors

KW - Venous thromboembolism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58149340854&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=58149340854&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e31818da7e7

DO - 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e31818da7e7

M3 - Article

VL - 101

SP - 1209

EP - 1215

JO - Southern Medical Journal

JF - Southern Medical Journal

SN - 0038-4348

IS - 12

ER -