Improving the Detection of Feigned Knowledge Deficits in Defendants Adjudicated Incompetent to Stand Trial

Emily D. Gottfried, B. Lee Hudson, Michael J Vitacco, Joyce L. Carbonell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Malingering is relatively common in criminal forensic evaluations as base rates of malingering have ranged from 20% to 30%. Given that the most prevalent criminal forensic evaluation is the assessment of competency to stand trial, the assessment of feigning during competency evaluations is necessary for accurate findings. Most of the response style literature focuses on feigning mental health symptoms, but in competency evaluations, individuals may attempt to feign legal knowledge deficits in order to be found incompetent to stand trial. The current investigation includes two studies: 195 students instructed to simulate feigned mental illness or incompetence to stand trial and one using a sample of 130 state psychiatric hospital residents who had been adjudicated incompetent to stand trial. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the Inventory of Legal Knowledge’s (ILK; Musick & Otto, 2010) ability to detect individuals who are feigning legal knowledge deficits. Classification utility statistics, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive power, and negative predictive power are provided for each cut-score on the ILK beginning with a cut-score of 24 (which is the lower end of the range of chance) are provided. The current cut-score of 47 provided in the professional manual of the ILK was shown to create a large number of false positives and suggests that modifications to this cut-score are required.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)232-243
Number of pages12
JournalAssessment
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2017

Fingerprint

Malingering
State Hospitals
Aptitude
Psychiatric Hospitals
Mental Health
Students
Sensitivity and Specificity
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • ILK
  • Inventory of Legal Knowledge
  • court competency
  • feigning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Improving the Detection of Feigned Knowledge Deficits in Defendants Adjudicated Incompetent to Stand Trial. / Gottfried, Emily D.; Hudson, B. Lee; Vitacco, Michael J; Carbonell, Joyce L.

In: Assessment, Vol. 24, No. 2, 01.03.2017, p. 232-243.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gottfried, Emily D. ; Hudson, B. Lee ; Vitacco, Michael J ; Carbonell, Joyce L. / Improving the Detection of Feigned Knowledge Deficits in Defendants Adjudicated Incompetent to Stand Trial. In: Assessment. 2017 ; Vol. 24, No. 2. pp. 232-243.
@article{5b1faa93412141db889bc0c91cf34547,
title = "Improving the Detection of Feigned Knowledge Deficits in Defendants Adjudicated Incompetent to Stand Trial",
abstract = "Malingering is relatively common in criminal forensic evaluations as base rates of malingering have ranged from 20{\%} to 30{\%}. Given that the most prevalent criminal forensic evaluation is the assessment of competency to stand trial, the assessment of feigning during competency evaluations is necessary for accurate findings. Most of the response style literature focuses on feigning mental health symptoms, but in competency evaluations, individuals may attempt to feign legal knowledge deficits in order to be found incompetent to stand trial. The current investigation includes two studies: 195 students instructed to simulate feigned mental illness or incompetence to stand trial and one using a sample of 130 state psychiatric hospital residents who had been adjudicated incompetent to stand trial. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the Inventory of Legal Knowledge’s (ILK; Musick & Otto, 2010) ability to detect individuals who are feigning legal knowledge deficits. Classification utility statistics, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive power, and negative predictive power are provided for each cut-score on the ILK beginning with a cut-score of 24 (which is the lower end of the range of chance) are provided. The current cut-score of 47 provided in the professional manual of the ILK was shown to create a large number of false positives and suggests that modifications to this cut-score are required.",
keywords = "ILK, Inventory of Legal Knowledge, court competency, feigning",
author = "Gottfried, {Emily D.} and Hudson, {B. Lee} and Vitacco, {Michael J} and Carbonell, {Joyce L.}",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1073191115605631",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "232--243",
journal = "Assessment",
issn = "1073-1911",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improving the Detection of Feigned Knowledge Deficits in Defendants Adjudicated Incompetent to Stand Trial

AU - Gottfried, Emily D.

AU - Hudson, B. Lee

AU - Vitacco, Michael J

AU - Carbonell, Joyce L.

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - Malingering is relatively common in criminal forensic evaluations as base rates of malingering have ranged from 20% to 30%. Given that the most prevalent criminal forensic evaluation is the assessment of competency to stand trial, the assessment of feigning during competency evaluations is necessary for accurate findings. Most of the response style literature focuses on feigning mental health symptoms, but in competency evaluations, individuals may attempt to feign legal knowledge deficits in order to be found incompetent to stand trial. The current investigation includes two studies: 195 students instructed to simulate feigned mental illness or incompetence to stand trial and one using a sample of 130 state psychiatric hospital residents who had been adjudicated incompetent to stand trial. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the Inventory of Legal Knowledge’s (ILK; Musick & Otto, 2010) ability to detect individuals who are feigning legal knowledge deficits. Classification utility statistics, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive power, and negative predictive power are provided for each cut-score on the ILK beginning with a cut-score of 24 (which is the lower end of the range of chance) are provided. The current cut-score of 47 provided in the professional manual of the ILK was shown to create a large number of false positives and suggests that modifications to this cut-score are required.

AB - Malingering is relatively common in criminal forensic evaluations as base rates of malingering have ranged from 20% to 30%. Given that the most prevalent criminal forensic evaluation is the assessment of competency to stand trial, the assessment of feigning during competency evaluations is necessary for accurate findings. Most of the response style literature focuses on feigning mental health symptoms, but in competency evaluations, individuals may attempt to feign legal knowledge deficits in order to be found incompetent to stand trial. The current investigation includes two studies: 195 students instructed to simulate feigned mental illness or incompetence to stand trial and one using a sample of 130 state psychiatric hospital residents who had been adjudicated incompetent to stand trial. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the Inventory of Legal Knowledge’s (ILK; Musick & Otto, 2010) ability to detect individuals who are feigning legal knowledge deficits. Classification utility statistics, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive power, and negative predictive power are provided for each cut-score on the ILK beginning with a cut-score of 24 (which is the lower end of the range of chance) are provided. The current cut-score of 47 provided in the professional manual of the ILK was shown to create a large number of false positives and suggests that modifications to this cut-score are required.

KW - ILK

KW - Inventory of Legal Knowledge

KW - court competency

KW - feigning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011933979&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011933979&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1073191115605631

DO - 10.1177/1073191115605631

M3 - Article

C2 - 26423350

AN - SCOPUS:85011933979

VL - 24

SP - 232

EP - 243

JO - Assessment

JF - Assessment

SN - 1073-1911

IS - 2

ER -