Incentives and league structure in minor league baseball

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to analyze the effect of different ways of organizing sports leagues on team effort. Double A minor league baseball in the United States is organized either as geographical leagues or as split season leagues. The evidence resented in this article suggests that teams in geographical leagues reduce their effort for longer periods of time (up to twice as long) than their counterparts in split season leagues. However, more teams give up trying to catch the leader in split season leagues than in geographical leagues. In fact, up to one third of teams in the split season league give up whereas no teams give up in the geographical league. This information will be of use to owners, managers, and coaches of sports teams because they will be able to identify periods of time when extra incentives to win may be required.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)119-141
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Sport Management
Volume23
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Baseball
Motivation
Sports
Incentives

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Decision Sciences(all)
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

Incentives and league structure in minor league baseball. / Medcalfe, Simon.

In: Journal of Sport Management, Vol. 23, No. 2, 03.2009, p. 119-141.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7cc40927ff9e4f7ca8380cad82ff26d3,
title = "Incentives and league structure in minor league baseball",
abstract = "The purpose of this article is to analyze the effect of different ways of organizing sports leagues on team effort. Double A minor league baseball in the United States is organized either as geographical leagues or as split season leagues. The evidence resented in this article suggests that teams in geographical leagues reduce their effort for longer periods of time (up to twice as long) than their counterparts in split season leagues. However, more teams give up trying to catch the leader in split season leagues than in geographical leagues. In fact, up to one third of teams in the split season league give up whereas no teams give up in the geographical league. This information will be of use to owners, managers, and coaches of sports teams because they will be able to identify periods of time when extra incentives to win may be required.",
author = "Simon Medcalfe",
year = "2009",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1123/jsm.23.2.119",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "119--141",
journal = "Journal of Sport Management",
issn = "0888-4773",
publisher = "Human Kinetics Publishers Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Incentives and league structure in minor league baseball

AU - Medcalfe, Simon

PY - 2009/3

Y1 - 2009/3

N2 - The purpose of this article is to analyze the effect of different ways of organizing sports leagues on team effort. Double A minor league baseball in the United States is organized either as geographical leagues or as split season leagues. The evidence resented in this article suggests that teams in geographical leagues reduce their effort for longer periods of time (up to twice as long) than their counterparts in split season leagues. However, more teams give up trying to catch the leader in split season leagues than in geographical leagues. In fact, up to one third of teams in the split season league give up whereas no teams give up in the geographical league. This information will be of use to owners, managers, and coaches of sports teams because they will be able to identify periods of time when extra incentives to win may be required.

AB - The purpose of this article is to analyze the effect of different ways of organizing sports leagues on team effort. Double A minor league baseball in the United States is organized either as geographical leagues or as split season leagues. The evidence resented in this article suggests that teams in geographical leagues reduce their effort for longer periods of time (up to twice as long) than their counterparts in split season leagues. However, more teams give up trying to catch the leader in split season leagues than in geographical leagues. In fact, up to one third of teams in the split season league give up whereas no teams give up in the geographical league. This information will be of use to owners, managers, and coaches of sports teams because they will be able to identify periods of time when extra incentives to win may be required.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67650696598&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67650696598&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1123/jsm.23.2.119

DO - 10.1123/jsm.23.2.119

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:67650696598

VL - 23

SP - 119

EP - 141

JO - Journal of Sport Management

JF - Journal of Sport Management

SN - 0888-4773

IS - 2

ER -