Incidence and reasons for hardware removal following operative fixation of distal radius fractures

Mark Christopher Snoddy, Thomas J. An, Benjamin S. Hooe, Harrison F. Kay, Donald H. Lee, Nick D. Pappas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose To determine the incidence and reasons for hardware removal after operative fixation of distal radius fractures. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 33 patients who underwent removal of a volar distal radius plate from 2007 to 2013. We recorded the primary reason for plate removal, patient sex, body mass index, AO fracture type, and plate manufacturer. The total number of both distal radius plating procedures and implant removals was analyzed. Results Of the 33 patients who underwent implant removal, the most common reasons for removal were pain (30%), tenosynovitis (27%), malunion (24%), infection (12%), nonunion (6%), and tendon rupture (3%). The most common AO fracture types requiring plate removal were A2, C2, and C3 (7 each). A total of 517 distal radius fractures received plate fixation at our institution from 2007 to 2009, a number that rose to 610 from 2010 to 2012. The number of distal radius plate removals over that same time was relatively constant at 17 and 16, respectively. Conclusions We advise continued review of reasons for implant removal to limit future hardware complications related to volar plating of distal radius fractures. Type of study/level of evidence Therapeutic IV.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)505-507
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Hand Surgery
Volume40
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Radius Fractures
Incidence
Tenosynovitis
varespladib methyl
Tendons
Rupture
Body Mass Index
Pain
Infection
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Distal radius
  • hardware removal
  • volar locking plates.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Incidence and reasons for hardware removal following operative fixation of distal radius fractures. / Snoddy, Mark Christopher; An, Thomas J.; Hooe, Benjamin S.; Kay, Harrison F.; Lee, Donald H.; Pappas, Nick D.

In: Journal of Hand Surgery, Vol. 40, No. 3, 01.03.2015, p. 505-507.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Snoddy, Mark Christopher ; An, Thomas J. ; Hooe, Benjamin S. ; Kay, Harrison F. ; Lee, Donald H. ; Pappas, Nick D. / Incidence and reasons for hardware removal following operative fixation of distal radius fractures. In: Journal of Hand Surgery. 2015 ; Vol. 40, No. 3. pp. 505-507.
@article{fc239e9527a24d37b1ea6b7c9e105b60,
title = "Incidence and reasons for hardware removal following operative fixation of distal radius fractures",
abstract = "Purpose To determine the incidence and reasons for hardware removal after operative fixation of distal radius fractures. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 33 patients who underwent removal of a volar distal radius plate from 2007 to 2013. We recorded the primary reason for plate removal, patient sex, body mass index, AO fracture type, and plate manufacturer. The total number of both distal radius plating procedures and implant removals was analyzed. Results Of the 33 patients who underwent implant removal, the most common reasons for removal were pain (30{\%}), tenosynovitis (27{\%}), malunion (24{\%}), infection (12{\%}), nonunion (6{\%}), and tendon rupture (3{\%}). The most common AO fracture types requiring plate removal were A2, C2, and C3 (7 each). A total of 517 distal radius fractures received plate fixation at our institution from 2007 to 2009, a number that rose to 610 from 2010 to 2012. The number of distal radius plate removals over that same time was relatively constant at 17 and 16, respectively. Conclusions We advise continued review of reasons for implant removal to limit future hardware complications related to volar plating of distal radius fractures. Type of study/level of evidence Therapeutic IV.",
keywords = "Distal radius, hardware removal, volar locking plates.",
author = "Snoddy, {Mark Christopher} and An, {Thomas J.} and Hooe, {Benjamin S.} and Kay, {Harrison F.} and Lee, {Donald H.} and Pappas, {Nick D.}",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.11.022",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "505--507",
journal = "Journal of Hand Surgery",
issn = "0363-5023",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Incidence and reasons for hardware removal following operative fixation of distal radius fractures

AU - Snoddy, Mark Christopher

AU - An, Thomas J.

AU - Hooe, Benjamin S.

AU - Kay, Harrison F.

AU - Lee, Donald H.

AU - Pappas, Nick D.

PY - 2015/3/1

Y1 - 2015/3/1

N2 - Purpose To determine the incidence and reasons for hardware removal after operative fixation of distal radius fractures. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 33 patients who underwent removal of a volar distal radius plate from 2007 to 2013. We recorded the primary reason for plate removal, patient sex, body mass index, AO fracture type, and plate manufacturer. The total number of both distal radius plating procedures and implant removals was analyzed. Results Of the 33 patients who underwent implant removal, the most common reasons for removal were pain (30%), tenosynovitis (27%), malunion (24%), infection (12%), nonunion (6%), and tendon rupture (3%). The most common AO fracture types requiring plate removal were A2, C2, and C3 (7 each). A total of 517 distal radius fractures received plate fixation at our institution from 2007 to 2009, a number that rose to 610 from 2010 to 2012. The number of distal radius plate removals over that same time was relatively constant at 17 and 16, respectively. Conclusions We advise continued review of reasons for implant removal to limit future hardware complications related to volar plating of distal radius fractures. Type of study/level of evidence Therapeutic IV.

AB - Purpose To determine the incidence and reasons for hardware removal after operative fixation of distal radius fractures. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 33 patients who underwent removal of a volar distal radius plate from 2007 to 2013. We recorded the primary reason for plate removal, patient sex, body mass index, AO fracture type, and plate manufacturer. The total number of both distal radius plating procedures and implant removals was analyzed. Results Of the 33 patients who underwent implant removal, the most common reasons for removal were pain (30%), tenosynovitis (27%), malunion (24%), infection (12%), nonunion (6%), and tendon rupture (3%). The most common AO fracture types requiring plate removal were A2, C2, and C3 (7 each). A total of 517 distal radius fractures received plate fixation at our institution from 2007 to 2009, a number that rose to 610 from 2010 to 2012. The number of distal radius plate removals over that same time was relatively constant at 17 and 16, respectively. Conclusions We advise continued review of reasons for implant removal to limit future hardware complications related to volar plating of distal radius fractures. Type of study/level of evidence Therapeutic IV.

KW - Distal radius

KW - hardware removal

KW - volar locking plates.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924264284&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84924264284&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.11.022

DO - 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.11.022

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 505

EP - 507

JO - Journal of Hand Surgery

JF - Journal of Hand Surgery

SN - 0363-5023

IS - 3

ER -