Incidence of small bowel obstruction after laparoscopic and open colon resection

Melissa Alvarez-Downing, Zachary W A Klaassen, Robert Orringer, Mark Gilder, Debra Tarantino, Ronald S. Chamberlain

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is responsible for more than 1 billion dollars in health care costs yearly in the United States. We sought to evaluate whether laparoscopic colorectal surgery resulted in a decreased incidence of SBO within the first year of surgical resection compared with open surgery. Methods From January 2003 to December 2008, 339 patients underwent open (open colorectal resection [OPEN]) colorectal resection and 448 patients underwent laparoscopic (laparoscopic colorectal resection [LAP]) colorectal resection. Hospital admissions up to 1 year after the initial resection identified patients admitted for the management of SBO, ileus, or nausea and vomiting. Results During the 1st year after surgery, 6 patients in the OPEN group developed SBO, and 5 patients in the LAP group developed SBO. The overall frequency of SBO for the OPEN group was 1.8% and 1.1% for the LAP group (P < .5461). Conclusions Although advantages such as quicker postoperative recovery and decreased hospital stay have been attributed to laparoscopic surgery, no difference in the incidence of SBO within the 1st year of surgery was found compared with open colorectal surgery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)411-415
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgery
Volume201
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2011

Fingerprint

Colon
Incidence
Colorectal Surgery
Laparoscopy
Ileus
Health Care Costs
Nausea
Vomiting
Length of Stay

Keywords

  • Adhesion
  • Colorectal resection
  • Laparoscopic surgery
  • Small bowel Obstruction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Incidence of small bowel obstruction after laparoscopic and open colon resection. / Alvarez-Downing, Melissa; Klaassen, Zachary W A; Orringer, Robert; Gilder, Mark; Tarantino, Debra; Chamberlain, Ronald S.

In: American Journal of Surgery, Vol. 201, No. 3, 01.03.2011, p. 411-415.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Alvarez-Downing, M, Klaassen, ZWA, Orringer, R, Gilder, M, Tarantino, D & Chamberlain, RS 2011, 'Incidence of small bowel obstruction after laparoscopic and open colon resection', American Journal of Surgery, vol. 201, no. 3, pp. 411-415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.09.015
Alvarez-Downing, Melissa ; Klaassen, Zachary W A ; Orringer, Robert ; Gilder, Mark ; Tarantino, Debra ; Chamberlain, Ronald S. / Incidence of small bowel obstruction after laparoscopic and open colon resection. In: American Journal of Surgery. 2011 ; Vol. 201, No. 3. pp. 411-415.
@article{fdb5a537ac0f4654b8d5df46e083e31e,
title = "Incidence of small bowel obstruction after laparoscopic and open colon resection",
abstract = "Background Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is responsible for more than 1 billion dollars in health care costs yearly in the United States. We sought to evaluate whether laparoscopic colorectal surgery resulted in a decreased incidence of SBO within the first year of surgical resection compared with open surgery. Methods From January 2003 to December 2008, 339 patients underwent open (open colorectal resection [OPEN]) colorectal resection and 448 patients underwent laparoscopic (laparoscopic colorectal resection [LAP]) colorectal resection. Hospital admissions up to 1 year after the initial resection identified patients admitted for the management of SBO, ileus, or nausea and vomiting. Results During the 1st year after surgery, 6 patients in the OPEN group developed SBO, and 5 patients in the LAP group developed SBO. The overall frequency of SBO for the OPEN group was 1.8{\%} and 1.1{\%} for the LAP group (P < .5461). Conclusions Although advantages such as quicker postoperative recovery and decreased hospital stay have been attributed to laparoscopic surgery, no difference in the incidence of SBO within the 1st year of surgery was found compared with open colorectal surgery.",
keywords = "Adhesion, Colorectal resection, Laparoscopic surgery, Small bowel Obstruction",
author = "Melissa Alvarez-Downing and Klaassen, {Zachary W A} and Robert Orringer and Mark Gilder and Debra Tarantino and Chamberlain, {Ronald S.}",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.09.015",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "201",
pages = "411--415",
journal = "American Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0002-9610",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Incidence of small bowel obstruction after laparoscopic and open colon resection

AU - Alvarez-Downing, Melissa

AU - Klaassen, Zachary W A

AU - Orringer, Robert

AU - Gilder, Mark

AU - Tarantino, Debra

AU - Chamberlain, Ronald S.

PY - 2011/3/1

Y1 - 2011/3/1

N2 - Background Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is responsible for more than 1 billion dollars in health care costs yearly in the United States. We sought to evaluate whether laparoscopic colorectal surgery resulted in a decreased incidence of SBO within the first year of surgical resection compared with open surgery. Methods From January 2003 to December 2008, 339 patients underwent open (open colorectal resection [OPEN]) colorectal resection and 448 patients underwent laparoscopic (laparoscopic colorectal resection [LAP]) colorectal resection. Hospital admissions up to 1 year after the initial resection identified patients admitted for the management of SBO, ileus, or nausea and vomiting. Results During the 1st year after surgery, 6 patients in the OPEN group developed SBO, and 5 patients in the LAP group developed SBO. The overall frequency of SBO for the OPEN group was 1.8% and 1.1% for the LAP group (P < .5461). Conclusions Although advantages such as quicker postoperative recovery and decreased hospital stay have been attributed to laparoscopic surgery, no difference in the incidence of SBO within the 1st year of surgery was found compared with open colorectal surgery.

AB - Background Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is responsible for more than 1 billion dollars in health care costs yearly in the United States. We sought to evaluate whether laparoscopic colorectal surgery resulted in a decreased incidence of SBO within the first year of surgical resection compared with open surgery. Methods From January 2003 to December 2008, 339 patients underwent open (open colorectal resection [OPEN]) colorectal resection and 448 patients underwent laparoscopic (laparoscopic colorectal resection [LAP]) colorectal resection. Hospital admissions up to 1 year after the initial resection identified patients admitted for the management of SBO, ileus, or nausea and vomiting. Results During the 1st year after surgery, 6 patients in the OPEN group developed SBO, and 5 patients in the LAP group developed SBO. The overall frequency of SBO for the OPEN group was 1.8% and 1.1% for the LAP group (P < .5461). Conclusions Although advantages such as quicker postoperative recovery and decreased hospital stay have been attributed to laparoscopic surgery, no difference in the incidence of SBO within the 1st year of surgery was found compared with open colorectal surgery.

KW - Adhesion

KW - Colorectal resection

KW - Laparoscopic surgery

KW - Small bowel Obstruction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952119918&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952119918&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.09.015

DO - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.09.015

M3 - Article

C2 - 21367389

AN - SCOPUS:79952119918

VL - 201

SP - 411

EP - 415

JO - American Journal of Surgery

JF - American Journal of Surgery

SN - 0002-9610

IS - 3

ER -