Increased base rate of atrial pacing for prevention of atrial fibrillation after implantation of a dual-chamber pacemaker: Insights from the atrial overdrive pacing study

Bharat K. Kantharia, Roger A. Freedman, David Hoekenga, Gery Tomassoni, Seth Worley, Robert A Sorrentino, David Steinhaus, Joel M. Wolkowicz, Zaffer A. Syed

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims: Different pacing sites and various algorithms have been utilized to prevent atrial fibrillation (AF) in pacemaker recipients. However, the optimal pacing rate settings have not yet been established. In this randomized, prospective, multicentre, single-blinded, cross over study, rate-adaptive pacing at a high base rate (BR) in patients, age 60 years or above, or a history of paroxysmal AF, who underwent dual-chamber (DDD) pacemaker implantation for standard pacing indications, was evaluated for prevention of AF. Methods and results: In the study cohort of 145 patients implanted with DDD pacemakers with a programmable rest rate (RR) feature, the BR/RR settings were sequentially but randomly adjusted as follows: 60 bpm/Off for the baseline quarter (initial 3 months) and then to either 'A-B-C' or 'C-B-A' settings (A = 70/65 bpm, B = 70/Off, C = 80/65 bpm) for the subsequent quarters each of 3 months duration. Data on automatic mode switch episodes, device diagnostics, and a questionnaire evaluating pacemaker awareness and palpitations were collected. Ninety-nine patients, mean age 77 ± 10 years, who completed the study protocol and followed for 12 months did not show significant differences in the number of mode switch episodes between any settings used. The percentage of atrial pacing was lower during baseline pacing compared to settings A, B, and C (P < 0.0001). Setting C produced a higher percentage of atrial pacing than A and B (P < 0.01). Although a higher percentage of atrial pacing correlated with a lower incidence of mode switch episodes, there was no statistically significant difference in the number of mode switch episodes between settings A, B, and C. There were no significant differences in the questionnaire scores relating to pacemaker awareness or palpitation. Conclusion: Overdrive single-site pacing in the right atrium achieved by programming analysed settings in the present study did not reduce AF as assessed by mode switch episodes. Additionally, no change in the symptoms of arrhythmia or awareness of pacing was seen.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1024-1030
Number of pages7
JournalEuropace
Volume9
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Atrial Fibrillation
Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane
Heart Atria
Cross-Over Studies
Cardiac Arrhythmias
Cohort Studies
Equipment and Supplies
Incidence
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Atrial fibrillation
  • Atrial overdrive pacing
  • Cardiac pacing
  • Dual-chamber pacemaker

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Increased base rate of atrial pacing for prevention of atrial fibrillation after implantation of a dual-chamber pacemaker : Insights from the atrial overdrive pacing study. / Kantharia, Bharat K.; Freedman, Roger A.; Hoekenga, David; Tomassoni, Gery; Worley, Seth; Sorrentino, Robert A; Steinhaus, David; Wolkowicz, Joel M.; Syed, Zaffer A.

In: Europace, Vol. 9, No. 11, 01.11.2007, p. 1024-1030.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kantharia, Bharat K. ; Freedman, Roger A. ; Hoekenga, David ; Tomassoni, Gery ; Worley, Seth ; Sorrentino, Robert A ; Steinhaus, David ; Wolkowicz, Joel M. ; Syed, Zaffer A. / Increased base rate of atrial pacing for prevention of atrial fibrillation after implantation of a dual-chamber pacemaker : Insights from the atrial overdrive pacing study. In: Europace. 2007 ; Vol. 9, No. 11. pp. 1024-1030.
@article{55d46ad922104098900376341cc1ce4b,
title = "Increased base rate of atrial pacing for prevention of atrial fibrillation after implantation of a dual-chamber pacemaker: Insights from the atrial overdrive pacing study",
abstract = "Aims: Different pacing sites and various algorithms have been utilized to prevent atrial fibrillation (AF) in pacemaker recipients. However, the optimal pacing rate settings have not yet been established. In this randomized, prospective, multicentre, single-blinded, cross over study, rate-adaptive pacing at a high base rate (BR) in patients, age 60 years or above, or a history of paroxysmal AF, who underwent dual-chamber (DDD) pacemaker implantation for standard pacing indications, was evaluated for prevention of AF. Methods and results: In the study cohort of 145 patients implanted with DDD pacemakers with a programmable rest rate (RR) feature, the BR/RR settings were sequentially but randomly adjusted as follows: 60 bpm/Off for the baseline quarter (initial 3 months) and then to either 'A-B-C' or 'C-B-A' settings (A = 70/65 bpm, B = 70/Off, C = 80/65 bpm) for the subsequent quarters each of 3 months duration. Data on automatic mode switch episodes, device diagnostics, and a questionnaire evaluating pacemaker awareness and palpitations were collected. Ninety-nine patients, mean age 77 ± 10 years, who completed the study protocol and followed for 12 months did not show significant differences in the number of mode switch episodes between any settings used. The percentage of atrial pacing was lower during baseline pacing compared to settings A, B, and C (P < 0.0001). Setting C produced a higher percentage of atrial pacing than A and B (P < 0.01). Although a higher percentage of atrial pacing correlated with a lower incidence of mode switch episodes, there was no statistically significant difference in the number of mode switch episodes between settings A, B, and C. There were no significant differences in the questionnaire scores relating to pacemaker awareness or palpitation. Conclusion: Overdrive single-site pacing in the right atrium achieved by programming analysed settings in the present study did not reduce AF as assessed by mode switch episodes. Additionally, no change in the symptoms of arrhythmia or awareness of pacing was seen.",
keywords = "Atrial fibrillation, Atrial overdrive pacing, Cardiac pacing, Dual-chamber pacemaker",
author = "Kantharia, {Bharat K.} and Freedman, {Roger A.} and David Hoekenga and Gery Tomassoni and Seth Worley and Sorrentino, {Robert A} and David Steinhaus and Wolkowicz, {Joel M.} and Syed, {Zaffer A.}",
year = "2007",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/europace/eum170",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "1024--1030",
journal = "Europace",
issn = "1099-5129",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Increased base rate of atrial pacing for prevention of atrial fibrillation after implantation of a dual-chamber pacemaker

T2 - Insights from the atrial overdrive pacing study

AU - Kantharia, Bharat K.

AU - Freedman, Roger A.

AU - Hoekenga, David

AU - Tomassoni, Gery

AU - Worley, Seth

AU - Sorrentino, Robert A

AU - Steinhaus, David

AU - Wolkowicz, Joel M.

AU - Syed, Zaffer A.

PY - 2007/11/1

Y1 - 2007/11/1

N2 - Aims: Different pacing sites and various algorithms have been utilized to prevent atrial fibrillation (AF) in pacemaker recipients. However, the optimal pacing rate settings have not yet been established. In this randomized, prospective, multicentre, single-blinded, cross over study, rate-adaptive pacing at a high base rate (BR) in patients, age 60 years or above, or a history of paroxysmal AF, who underwent dual-chamber (DDD) pacemaker implantation for standard pacing indications, was evaluated for prevention of AF. Methods and results: In the study cohort of 145 patients implanted with DDD pacemakers with a programmable rest rate (RR) feature, the BR/RR settings were sequentially but randomly adjusted as follows: 60 bpm/Off for the baseline quarter (initial 3 months) and then to either 'A-B-C' or 'C-B-A' settings (A = 70/65 bpm, B = 70/Off, C = 80/65 bpm) for the subsequent quarters each of 3 months duration. Data on automatic mode switch episodes, device diagnostics, and a questionnaire evaluating pacemaker awareness and palpitations were collected. Ninety-nine patients, mean age 77 ± 10 years, who completed the study protocol and followed for 12 months did not show significant differences in the number of mode switch episodes between any settings used. The percentage of atrial pacing was lower during baseline pacing compared to settings A, B, and C (P < 0.0001). Setting C produced a higher percentage of atrial pacing than A and B (P < 0.01). Although a higher percentage of atrial pacing correlated with a lower incidence of mode switch episodes, there was no statistically significant difference in the number of mode switch episodes between settings A, B, and C. There were no significant differences in the questionnaire scores relating to pacemaker awareness or palpitation. Conclusion: Overdrive single-site pacing in the right atrium achieved by programming analysed settings in the present study did not reduce AF as assessed by mode switch episodes. Additionally, no change in the symptoms of arrhythmia or awareness of pacing was seen.

AB - Aims: Different pacing sites and various algorithms have been utilized to prevent atrial fibrillation (AF) in pacemaker recipients. However, the optimal pacing rate settings have not yet been established. In this randomized, prospective, multicentre, single-blinded, cross over study, rate-adaptive pacing at a high base rate (BR) in patients, age 60 years or above, or a history of paroxysmal AF, who underwent dual-chamber (DDD) pacemaker implantation for standard pacing indications, was evaluated for prevention of AF. Methods and results: In the study cohort of 145 patients implanted with DDD pacemakers with a programmable rest rate (RR) feature, the BR/RR settings were sequentially but randomly adjusted as follows: 60 bpm/Off for the baseline quarter (initial 3 months) and then to either 'A-B-C' or 'C-B-A' settings (A = 70/65 bpm, B = 70/Off, C = 80/65 bpm) for the subsequent quarters each of 3 months duration. Data on automatic mode switch episodes, device diagnostics, and a questionnaire evaluating pacemaker awareness and palpitations were collected. Ninety-nine patients, mean age 77 ± 10 years, who completed the study protocol and followed for 12 months did not show significant differences in the number of mode switch episodes between any settings used. The percentage of atrial pacing was lower during baseline pacing compared to settings A, B, and C (P < 0.0001). Setting C produced a higher percentage of atrial pacing than A and B (P < 0.01). Although a higher percentage of atrial pacing correlated with a lower incidence of mode switch episodes, there was no statistically significant difference in the number of mode switch episodes between settings A, B, and C. There were no significant differences in the questionnaire scores relating to pacemaker awareness or palpitation. Conclusion: Overdrive single-site pacing in the right atrium achieved by programming analysed settings in the present study did not reduce AF as assessed by mode switch episodes. Additionally, no change in the symptoms of arrhythmia or awareness of pacing was seen.

KW - Atrial fibrillation

KW - Atrial overdrive pacing

KW - Cardiac pacing

KW - Dual-chamber pacemaker

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=40049103823&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=40049103823&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/europace/eum170

DO - 10.1093/europace/eum170

M3 - Article

C2 - 17913697

AN - SCOPUS:40049103823

VL - 9

SP - 1024

EP - 1030

JO - Europace

JF - Europace

SN - 1099-5129

IS - 11

ER -