Inequity in the distribution of science and technology outcomes

A conceptual model

Barry Bozeman, Catherine P Slade, Paul Hirsch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We propose a conceptual model to encourage systematic analysis of social equity issues of science policy. The model considers the relationships among several attributes of science and technology goods and services including the incidence of its impact, degree of concentration, and whether its consumption generates capacity for the individual or groups or is "hedonic," that is, short term and diminishing rapidly in its effects. We discuss the implications of the model in terms of four quite different types of equity. We conclude by suggesting some respects in which the model could be employed to facilitate public policy and moral deliberations about the effects of science and technology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)231-248
Number of pages18
JournalPolicy Sciences
Volume44
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2011

Fingerprint

science and technology
science
equity
science policy
deliberation
incidence
public policy
distribution
Group
effect
policy

Keywords

  • Equity
  • Public values
  • Science and technology policy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Development
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Public Administration
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Inequity in the distribution of science and technology outcomes : A conceptual model. / Bozeman, Barry; Slade, Catherine P; Hirsch, Paul.

In: Policy Sciences, Vol. 44, No. 3, 01.09.2011, p. 231-248.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{64820dc864e349a5835473a7041f6b36,
title = "Inequity in the distribution of science and technology outcomes: A conceptual model",
abstract = "We propose a conceptual model to encourage systematic analysis of social equity issues of science policy. The model considers the relationships among several attributes of science and technology goods and services including the incidence of its impact, degree of concentration, and whether its consumption generates capacity for the individual or groups or is {"}hedonic,{"} that is, short term and diminishing rapidly in its effects. We discuss the implications of the model in terms of four quite different types of equity. We conclude by suggesting some respects in which the model could be employed to facilitate public policy and moral deliberations about the effects of science and technology.",
keywords = "Equity, Public values, Science and technology policy",
author = "Barry Bozeman and Slade, {Catherine P} and Paul Hirsch",
year = "2011",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11077-011-9132-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "231--248",
journal = "Policy Sciences",
issn = "0032-2687",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inequity in the distribution of science and technology outcomes

T2 - A conceptual model

AU - Bozeman, Barry

AU - Slade, Catherine P

AU - Hirsch, Paul

PY - 2011/9/1

Y1 - 2011/9/1

N2 - We propose a conceptual model to encourage systematic analysis of social equity issues of science policy. The model considers the relationships among several attributes of science and technology goods and services including the incidence of its impact, degree of concentration, and whether its consumption generates capacity for the individual or groups or is "hedonic," that is, short term and diminishing rapidly in its effects. We discuss the implications of the model in terms of four quite different types of equity. We conclude by suggesting some respects in which the model could be employed to facilitate public policy and moral deliberations about the effects of science and technology.

AB - We propose a conceptual model to encourage systematic analysis of social equity issues of science policy. The model considers the relationships among several attributes of science and technology goods and services including the incidence of its impact, degree of concentration, and whether its consumption generates capacity for the individual or groups or is "hedonic," that is, short term and diminishing rapidly in its effects. We discuss the implications of the model in terms of four quite different types of equity. We conclude by suggesting some respects in which the model could be employed to facilitate public policy and moral deliberations about the effects of science and technology.

KW - Equity

KW - Public values

KW - Science and technology policy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80055034574&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80055034574&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11077-011-9132-8

DO - 10.1007/s11077-011-9132-8

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 231

EP - 248

JO - Policy Sciences

JF - Policy Sciences

SN - 0032-2687

IS - 3

ER -