Internal medicine clerkship directors' opinion regarding clinical input in the preclinical years: The 2002 CDIM basic science survey results

Kevin O'Brien, Lynn Crespo, Paul M Wallach, Michael Elnicki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Input from both basic science and clinical faculty members is needed to promote further integration of medical curricula. Purpose: To assess current views of clerkship directors about the role and relationship of the basic sciences to clinical years in medical education. Methods: As part of the 2002 Annual CDIM Survey, questions regarding basic science curriculum were included; 89 of 123 CDIM members responded (72%). Results: Overall, respondents felt participation from both basic science and clinical faculty members is necessary to define basic science course content. Nearly 89% of clerkship directors indicated curricular review should be collaborative and interdepartmental; 93% felt that this review effort should occur frequently. Supporting the growing philosophy that the structure of the preclinical years should involve increased clinically relevant integration, 58% favored an integrated organ system approach rather than the traditional departmental structure (18%). In addition, in order of ranking, respondents felt that small group (M = 2.0 ± 0.9) and problem-based learning (M = 2.1 ± 1.1) are better approaches than the standard lecture format (M = 2.8 ± 1.2). Although clerkship directors recognized the need for increased clinical input in the preclinical years, many reported a lack of knowledge regarding the amount of clinical exposure students received in the basic science years (33%), frequency of peer review of the basic science courses (20%), and who performed peer review of the basic science courses at their institution (36%). Conclusion: Medical clerkship directors believe that basic science education should be developed collaboratively, organized by organ system, and presented in small groups.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)105-109
Number of pages5
JournalTeaching and Learning in Medicine
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2006

Fingerprint

director
medicine
science
peer review
small group
curriculum
ranking
education
participation
lack
learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Internal medicine clerkship directors' opinion regarding clinical input in the preclinical years : The 2002 CDIM basic science survey results. / O'Brien, Kevin; Crespo, Lynn; Wallach, Paul M; Elnicki, Michael.

In: Teaching and Learning in Medicine, Vol. 18, No. 2, 01.03.2006, p. 105-109.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{147878a5662f4cb7a1a905699977dec1,
title = "Internal medicine clerkship directors' opinion regarding clinical input in the preclinical years: The 2002 CDIM basic science survey results",
abstract = "Background: Input from both basic science and clinical faculty members is needed to promote further integration of medical curricula. Purpose: To assess current views of clerkship directors about the role and relationship of the basic sciences to clinical years in medical education. Methods: As part of the 2002 Annual CDIM Survey, questions regarding basic science curriculum were included; 89 of 123 CDIM members responded (72{\%}). Results: Overall, respondents felt participation from both basic science and clinical faculty members is necessary to define basic science course content. Nearly 89{\%} of clerkship directors indicated curricular review should be collaborative and interdepartmental; 93{\%} felt that this review effort should occur frequently. Supporting the growing philosophy that the structure of the preclinical years should involve increased clinically relevant integration, 58{\%} favored an integrated organ system approach rather than the traditional departmental structure (18{\%}). In addition, in order of ranking, respondents felt that small group (M = 2.0 ± 0.9) and problem-based learning (M = 2.1 ± 1.1) are better approaches than the standard lecture format (M = 2.8 ± 1.2). Although clerkship directors recognized the need for increased clinical input in the preclinical years, many reported a lack of knowledge regarding the amount of clinical exposure students received in the basic science years (33{\%}), frequency of peer review of the basic science courses (20{\%}), and who performed peer review of the basic science courses at their institution (36{\%}). Conclusion: Medical clerkship directors believe that basic science education should be developed collaboratively, organized by organ system, and presented in small groups.",
author = "Kevin O'Brien and Lynn Crespo and Wallach, {Paul M} and Michael Elnicki",
year = "2006",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1207/s15328015tlm1802_3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "105--109",
journal = "Teaching and Learning in Medicine",
issn = "1040-1334",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Internal medicine clerkship directors' opinion regarding clinical input in the preclinical years

T2 - The 2002 CDIM basic science survey results

AU - O'Brien, Kevin

AU - Crespo, Lynn

AU - Wallach, Paul M

AU - Elnicki, Michael

PY - 2006/3/1

Y1 - 2006/3/1

N2 - Background: Input from both basic science and clinical faculty members is needed to promote further integration of medical curricula. Purpose: To assess current views of clerkship directors about the role and relationship of the basic sciences to clinical years in medical education. Methods: As part of the 2002 Annual CDIM Survey, questions regarding basic science curriculum were included; 89 of 123 CDIM members responded (72%). Results: Overall, respondents felt participation from both basic science and clinical faculty members is necessary to define basic science course content. Nearly 89% of clerkship directors indicated curricular review should be collaborative and interdepartmental; 93% felt that this review effort should occur frequently. Supporting the growing philosophy that the structure of the preclinical years should involve increased clinically relevant integration, 58% favored an integrated organ system approach rather than the traditional departmental structure (18%). In addition, in order of ranking, respondents felt that small group (M = 2.0 ± 0.9) and problem-based learning (M = 2.1 ± 1.1) are better approaches than the standard lecture format (M = 2.8 ± 1.2). Although clerkship directors recognized the need for increased clinical input in the preclinical years, many reported a lack of knowledge regarding the amount of clinical exposure students received in the basic science years (33%), frequency of peer review of the basic science courses (20%), and who performed peer review of the basic science courses at their institution (36%). Conclusion: Medical clerkship directors believe that basic science education should be developed collaboratively, organized by organ system, and presented in small groups.

AB - Background: Input from both basic science and clinical faculty members is needed to promote further integration of medical curricula. Purpose: To assess current views of clerkship directors about the role and relationship of the basic sciences to clinical years in medical education. Methods: As part of the 2002 Annual CDIM Survey, questions regarding basic science curriculum were included; 89 of 123 CDIM members responded (72%). Results: Overall, respondents felt participation from both basic science and clinical faculty members is necessary to define basic science course content. Nearly 89% of clerkship directors indicated curricular review should be collaborative and interdepartmental; 93% felt that this review effort should occur frequently. Supporting the growing philosophy that the structure of the preclinical years should involve increased clinically relevant integration, 58% favored an integrated organ system approach rather than the traditional departmental structure (18%). In addition, in order of ranking, respondents felt that small group (M = 2.0 ± 0.9) and problem-based learning (M = 2.1 ± 1.1) are better approaches than the standard lecture format (M = 2.8 ± 1.2). Although clerkship directors recognized the need for increased clinical input in the preclinical years, many reported a lack of knowledge regarding the amount of clinical exposure students received in the basic science years (33%), frequency of peer review of the basic science courses (20%), and who performed peer review of the basic science courses at their institution (36%). Conclusion: Medical clerkship directors believe that basic science education should be developed collaboratively, organized by organ system, and presented in small groups.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646584885&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646584885&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1207/s15328015tlm1802_3

DO - 10.1207/s15328015tlm1802_3

M3 - Article

C2 - 16626267

AN - SCOPUS:33646584885

VL - 18

SP - 105

EP - 109

JO - Teaching and Learning in Medicine

JF - Teaching and Learning in Medicine

SN - 1040-1334

IS - 2

ER -