Interobserver agreement for colposcopy quality control using digitized colposcopic images during the ALTS trial

Daron Gale Ferris, Mark Litaker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. To estimate interobserver agreement among colposcopy quality control reviewers viewing digitized cervical images during the Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance/Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Triage Study (ALTS). Materials and Methods. Three colposcopy quality control reviewers independently examined modem-transferred digitized colposcopic images from subjects examined at four clinical centers. Reviewers indicated colposcopic impression, Reid colposcopic index scores, lesion size, and the technical quality of the image. Rates of agreement were evaluated using the κ statistic and McNemar and Bowker tests of symmetry. Results. Regarding colposcopic impressions, the average weighted κ for pairs of initial reviewers was 0.36 (95% confidence interval, 0.33-0.39). κ scores with respect to Reid colposcopic index, cervical image quality, and lesion size ranged from 0.23 to 0.28, 0.18 to 0.27, and 0.33 to 0.42, respectively. Conclusions. Fair rates of agreement and poor to fair κ scores among ALTS colposcopy quality control reviewers were noted for colposcopic impression, Reid colposcopic index scores, image quality, and lesion size. Great latitude exists in the interpretation of digitized cervical images. Poor image quality partially may explain these suboptimal results.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)29-35
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Lower Genital Tract Disease
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2005

Fingerprint

Colposcopy
Quality Control
Modems
Triage
Confidence Intervals

Keywords

  • ALTS
  • Cervical neoplasia
  • Colposcopy
  • Interobserver agreement
  • Quality control

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Interobserver agreement for colposcopy quality control using digitized colposcopic images during the ALTS trial. / Ferris, Daron Gale; Litaker, Mark.

In: Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease, Vol. 9, No. 1, 01.01.2005, p. 29-35.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9564b84c114e49c59d331c227418b06c,
title = "Interobserver agreement for colposcopy quality control using digitized colposcopic images during the ALTS trial",
abstract = "Objective. To estimate interobserver agreement among colposcopy quality control reviewers viewing digitized cervical images during the Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance/Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Triage Study (ALTS). Materials and Methods. Three colposcopy quality control reviewers independently examined modem-transferred digitized colposcopic images from subjects examined at four clinical centers. Reviewers indicated colposcopic impression, Reid colposcopic index scores, lesion size, and the technical quality of the image. Rates of agreement were evaluated using the κ statistic and McNemar and Bowker tests of symmetry. Results. Regarding colposcopic impressions, the average weighted κ for pairs of initial reviewers was 0.36 (95{\%} confidence interval, 0.33-0.39). κ scores with respect to Reid colposcopic index, cervical image quality, and lesion size ranged from 0.23 to 0.28, 0.18 to 0.27, and 0.33 to 0.42, respectively. Conclusions. Fair rates of agreement and poor to fair κ scores among ALTS colposcopy quality control reviewers were noted for colposcopic impression, Reid colposcopic index scores, image quality, and lesion size. Great latitude exists in the interpretation of digitized cervical images. Poor image quality partially may explain these suboptimal results.",
keywords = "ALTS, Cervical neoplasia, Colposcopy, Interobserver agreement, Quality control",
author = "Ferris, {Daron Gale} and Mark Litaker",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00128360-200501000-00007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "29--35",
journal = "Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease",
issn = "1089-2591",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interobserver agreement for colposcopy quality control using digitized colposcopic images during the ALTS trial

AU - Ferris, Daron Gale

AU - Litaker, Mark

PY - 2005/1/1

Y1 - 2005/1/1

N2 - Objective. To estimate interobserver agreement among colposcopy quality control reviewers viewing digitized cervical images during the Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance/Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Triage Study (ALTS). Materials and Methods. Three colposcopy quality control reviewers independently examined modem-transferred digitized colposcopic images from subjects examined at four clinical centers. Reviewers indicated colposcopic impression, Reid colposcopic index scores, lesion size, and the technical quality of the image. Rates of agreement were evaluated using the κ statistic and McNemar and Bowker tests of symmetry. Results. Regarding colposcopic impressions, the average weighted κ for pairs of initial reviewers was 0.36 (95% confidence interval, 0.33-0.39). κ scores with respect to Reid colposcopic index, cervical image quality, and lesion size ranged from 0.23 to 0.28, 0.18 to 0.27, and 0.33 to 0.42, respectively. Conclusions. Fair rates of agreement and poor to fair κ scores among ALTS colposcopy quality control reviewers were noted for colposcopic impression, Reid colposcopic index scores, image quality, and lesion size. Great latitude exists in the interpretation of digitized cervical images. Poor image quality partially may explain these suboptimal results.

AB - Objective. To estimate interobserver agreement among colposcopy quality control reviewers viewing digitized cervical images during the Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance/Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Triage Study (ALTS). Materials and Methods. Three colposcopy quality control reviewers independently examined modem-transferred digitized colposcopic images from subjects examined at four clinical centers. Reviewers indicated colposcopic impression, Reid colposcopic index scores, lesion size, and the technical quality of the image. Rates of agreement were evaluated using the κ statistic and McNemar and Bowker tests of symmetry. Results. Regarding colposcopic impressions, the average weighted κ for pairs of initial reviewers was 0.36 (95% confidence interval, 0.33-0.39). κ scores with respect to Reid colposcopic index, cervical image quality, and lesion size ranged from 0.23 to 0.28, 0.18 to 0.27, and 0.33 to 0.42, respectively. Conclusions. Fair rates of agreement and poor to fair κ scores among ALTS colposcopy quality control reviewers were noted for colposcopic impression, Reid colposcopic index scores, image quality, and lesion size. Great latitude exists in the interpretation of digitized cervical images. Poor image quality partially may explain these suboptimal results.

KW - ALTS

KW - Cervical neoplasia

KW - Colposcopy

KW - Interobserver agreement

KW - Quality control

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=12244309785&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=12244309785&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00128360-200501000-00007

DO - 10.1097/00128360-200501000-00007

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 29

EP - 35

JO - Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease

JF - Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease

SN - 1089-2591

IS - 1

ER -