Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: Urologic pathologists

William C. Allsbrook, Kathy A. Mangold, Maribeth H. Johnson, Roger B. Lane, Cynthia G. Lane, Mahul B. Amin, David G. Bostwick, Peter A. Humphrey, Edward C. Jones, Victor E. Reuter, Wael Sakr, Isabell A. Sesterhenn, Patricia Troncoso, Thomas M. Wheeler, Jonathan I. Epstein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

197 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Gleason grading is now the most widely used grading system for prostatic carcinoma in the United States. However, there are only a few studies of the interobserver reproducibility of this system, and no extensive study of interobserver reproducibility among a large number of experienced urologic pathologists exists. Forty-six needle biopsies containing prostatic carcinoma were assigned Gleason scores by 10 urologic pathologists. The overall weighted kappa coefficient κw for Gleason score for each of the urologic pathologists compared with each of the remaining urologic pathologists ranged from 0.56 to 0.70, all but one being at least 0.60 (substantial agreement). The overall kappa coefficient κ for each pathologist compared with the others for Gleason score groups 2-4, 5-6, 7, and 8-10 ranged from 0.47 to 0.64 (moderate-substantial agreement), only one less than 0.50. At least 70% of the urologic pathologists agreed on the Gleason grade group (2-4, 5-6, 7, 8-10) in 38 ("consensus" cases) of the 46 cases. The 8 "nonconsensus" cases included low-grade tumors, tumors with small cribriform proliferations, and tumors whose histology was on the border between Gleason patterns. Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading among urologic pathologists is in an acceptable range.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)74-80
Number of pages7
JournalHuman Pathology
Volume32
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001

Fingerprint

Neoplasm Grading
Carcinoma
Neoplasms
Needle Biopsy
Pathologists
Histology

Keywords

  • Gleason grading
  • Grading
  • Interobserver reproducibility
  • Prostatic adenocarcinoma
  • Prostatic carcinoma
  • Prostatic neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Cite this

Allsbrook, W. C., Mangold, K. A., Johnson, M. H., Lane, R. B., Lane, C. G., Amin, M. B., ... Epstein, J. I. (2001). Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: Urologic pathologists. Human Pathology, 32(1), 74-80. https://doi.org/10.1053/hupa.2001.21134

Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma : Urologic pathologists. / Allsbrook, William C.; Mangold, Kathy A.; Johnson, Maribeth H.; Lane, Roger B.; Lane, Cynthia G.; Amin, Mahul B.; Bostwick, David G.; Humphrey, Peter A.; Jones, Edward C.; Reuter, Victor E.; Sakr, Wael; Sesterhenn, Isabell A.; Troncoso, Patricia; Wheeler, Thomas M.; Epstein, Jonathan I.

In: Human Pathology, Vol. 32, No. 1, 01.01.2001, p. 74-80.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Allsbrook, WC, Mangold, KA, Johnson, MH, Lane, RB, Lane, CG, Amin, MB, Bostwick, DG, Humphrey, PA, Jones, EC, Reuter, VE, Sakr, W, Sesterhenn, IA, Troncoso, P, Wheeler, TM & Epstein, JI 2001, 'Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: Urologic pathologists', Human Pathology, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 74-80. https://doi.org/10.1053/hupa.2001.21134
Allsbrook, William C. ; Mangold, Kathy A. ; Johnson, Maribeth H. ; Lane, Roger B. ; Lane, Cynthia G. ; Amin, Mahul B. ; Bostwick, David G. ; Humphrey, Peter A. ; Jones, Edward C. ; Reuter, Victor E. ; Sakr, Wael ; Sesterhenn, Isabell A. ; Troncoso, Patricia ; Wheeler, Thomas M. ; Epstein, Jonathan I. / Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma : Urologic pathologists. In: Human Pathology. 2001 ; Vol. 32, No. 1. pp. 74-80.
@article{48ec0a48c1a94935b843cc35acf3116a,
title = "Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: Urologic pathologists",
abstract = "Gleason grading is now the most widely used grading system for prostatic carcinoma in the United States. However, there are only a few studies of the interobserver reproducibility of this system, and no extensive study of interobserver reproducibility among a large number of experienced urologic pathologists exists. Forty-six needle biopsies containing prostatic carcinoma were assigned Gleason scores by 10 urologic pathologists. The overall weighted kappa coefficient κw for Gleason score for each of the urologic pathologists compared with each of the remaining urologic pathologists ranged from 0.56 to 0.70, all but one being at least 0.60 (substantial agreement). The overall kappa coefficient κ for each pathologist compared with the others for Gleason score groups 2-4, 5-6, 7, and 8-10 ranged from 0.47 to 0.64 (moderate-substantial agreement), only one less than 0.50. At least 70{\%} of the urologic pathologists agreed on the Gleason grade group (2-4, 5-6, 7, 8-10) in 38 ({"}consensus{"} cases) of the 46 cases. The 8 {"}nonconsensus{"} cases included low-grade tumors, tumors with small cribriform proliferations, and tumors whose histology was on the border between Gleason patterns. Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading among urologic pathologists is in an acceptable range.",
keywords = "Gleason grading, Grading, Interobserver reproducibility, Prostatic adenocarcinoma, Prostatic carcinoma, Prostatic neoplasms",
author = "Allsbrook, {William C.} and Mangold, {Kathy A.} and Johnson, {Maribeth H.} and Lane, {Roger B.} and Lane, {Cynthia G.} and Amin, {Mahul B.} and Bostwick, {David G.} and Humphrey, {Peter A.} and Jones, {Edward C.} and Reuter, {Victor E.} and Wael Sakr and Sesterhenn, {Isabell A.} and Patricia Troncoso and Wheeler, {Thomas M.} and Epstein, {Jonathan I.}",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1053/hupa.2001.21134",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "74--80",
journal = "Human Pathology",
issn = "0046-8177",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma

T2 - Urologic pathologists

AU - Allsbrook, William C.

AU - Mangold, Kathy A.

AU - Johnson, Maribeth H.

AU - Lane, Roger B.

AU - Lane, Cynthia G.

AU - Amin, Mahul B.

AU - Bostwick, David G.

AU - Humphrey, Peter A.

AU - Jones, Edward C.

AU - Reuter, Victor E.

AU - Sakr, Wael

AU - Sesterhenn, Isabell A.

AU - Troncoso, Patricia

AU - Wheeler, Thomas M.

AU - Epstein, Jonathan I.

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - Gleason grading is now the most widely used grading system for prostatic carcinoma in the United States. However, there are only a few studies of the interobserver reproducibility of this system, and no extensive study of interobserver reproducibility among a large number of experienced urologic pathologists exists. Forty-six needle biopsies containing prostatic carcinoma were assigned Gleason scores by 10 urologic pathologists. The overall weighted kappa coefficient κw for Gleason score for each of the urologic pathologists compared with each of the remaining urologic pathologists ranged from 0.56 to 0.70, all but one being at least 0.60 (substantial agreement). The overall kappa coefficient κ for each pathologist compared with the others for Gleason score groups 2-4, 5-6, 7, and 8-10 ranged from 0.47 to 0.64 (moderate-substantial agreement), only one less than 0.50. At least 70% of the urologic pathologists agreed on the Gleason grade group (2-4, 5-6, 7, 8-10) in 38 ("consensus" cases) of the 46 cases. The 8 "nonconsensus" cases included low-grade tumors, tumors with small cribriform proliferations, and tumors whose histology was on the border between Gleason patterns. Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading among urologic pathologists is in an acceptable range.

AB - Gleason grading is now the most widely used grading system for prostatic carcinoma in the United States. However, there are only a few studies of the interobserver reproducibility of this system, and no extensive study of interobserver reproducibility among a large number of experienced urologic pathologists exists. Forty-six needle biopsies containing prostatic carcinoma were assigned Gleason scores by 10 urologic pathologists. The overall weighted kappa coefficient κw for Gleason score for each of the urologic pathologists compared with each of the remaining urologic pathologists ranged from 0.56 to 0.70, all but one being at least 0.60 (substantial agreement). The overall kappa coefficient κ for each pathologist compared with the others for Gleason score groups 2-4, 5-6, 7, and 8-10 ranged from 0.47 to 0.64 (moderate-substantial agreement), only one less than 0.50. At least 70% of the urologic pathologists agreed on the Gleason grade group (2-4, 5-6, 7, 8-10) in 38 ("consensus" cases) of the 46 cases. The 8 "nonconsensus" cases included low-grade tumors, tumors with small cribriform proliferations, and tumors whose histology was on the border between Gleason patterns. Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading among urologic pathologists is in an acceptable range.

KW - Gleason grading

KW - Grading

KW - Interobserver reproducibility

KW - Prostatic adenocarcinoma

KW - Prostatic carcinoma

KW - Prostatic neoplasms

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035126050&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035126050&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1053/hupa.2001.21134

DO - 10.1053/hupa.2001.21134

M3 - Article

C2 - 11172298

AN - SCOPUS:0035126050

VL - 32

SP - 74

EP - 80

JO - Human Pathology

JF - Human Pathology

SN - 0046-8177

IS - 1

ER -