Interventions must be realistic to be useful and completed in family medicine

Marjorie A. Bowman, Dean A. Seehusen, Anne Victoria Neale

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Being realistic while helping our patients is this issue's theme. Given the volume of tasks required in family medicine, recommendations for improvements in direct care or care measurement cannot just be evidence-based but must also be realistic. On the list of realistic: ordering antipsychotics for symptoms of dementia in the elderly, despite recommendations to not do so; ordering antidepressants without fear that the patient could develop hypertension; mental health care providers in primary care offices; forced choice for opioid management; plus agenda setting for visit efficiency. Not yet realistic: Trigger tools to identify adverse events, and pharmacist recommendations related to pain management before opioid visits. Pneumococcal vaccine compliance is only realistic if recommendations are not recurrently changed, are paid for, and if prior immunizations are known. Increasing task delegation to prevent clinician burnout is not realistic if it burns out the nurses, or if the helpful scribes cannot be afforded. Helpful, yet questionably realistic: Primary care clinician involvement for patients in intensive care units and their families, and problem-solving therapy by family physicians. And, let us add 'frightening': few international medical school graduates to serve the underserved. The most frequent diagnoses and most critical diagnoses in family medicine are elucidated. (J Am Board Fam Med 2018;31:1- 4.).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-4
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Volume31
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Medicine
Opioid Analgesics
Primary Health Care
Pneumococcal Vaccines
Family Physicians
Pain Management
Medical Schools
Pharmacists
Health Personnel
Antidepressive Agents
Antipsychotic Agents
Compliance
Fear
Intensive Care Units
Dementia
Immunization
Mental Health
Nurses
Hypertension
Efficiency

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Family Practice

Cite this

Interventions must be realistic to be useful and completed in family medicine. / Bowman, Marjorie A.; Seehusen, Dean A.; Neale, Anne Victoria.

In: Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, Vol. 31, No. 1, 01.01.2018, p. 1-4.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{7be76a5ff1e04dbaa4877925c5ac0b5a,
title = "Interventions must be realistic to be useful and completed in family medicine",
abstract = "Being realistic while helping our patients is this issue's theme. Given the volume of tasks required in family medicine, recommendations for improvements in direct care or care measurement cannot just be evidence-based but must also be realistic. On the list of realistic: ordering antipsychotics for symptoms of dementia in the elderly, despite recommendations to not do so; ordering antidepressants without fear that the patient could develop hypertension; mental health care providers in primary care offices; forced choice for opioid management; plus agenda setting for visit efficiency. Not yet realistic: Trigger tools to identify adverse events, and pharmacist recommendations related to pain management before opioid visits. Pneumococcal vaccine compliance is only realistic if recommendations are not recurrently changed, are paid for, and if prior immunizations are known. Increasing task delegation to prevent clinician burnout is not realistic if it burns out the nurses, or if the helpful scribes cannot be afforded. Helpful, yet questionably realistic: Primary care clinician involvement for patients in intensive care units and their families, and problem-solving therapy by family physicians. And, let us add 'frightening': few international medical school graduates to serve the underserved. The most frequent diagnoses and most critical diagnoses in family medicine are elucidated. (J Am Board Fam Med 2018;31:1- 4.).",
author = "Bowman, {Marjorie A.} and Seehusen, {Dean A.} and Neale, {Anne Victoria}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3122/jabfm.2018.01.170422",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "1--4",
journal = "Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine",
issn = "1557-2625",
publisher = "American Board of Family Medicine",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interventions must be realistic to be useful and completed in family medicine

AU - Bowman, Marjorie A.

AU - Seehusen, Dean A.

AU - Neale, Anne Victoria

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Being realistic while helping our patients is this issue's theme. Given the volume of tasks required in family medicine, recommendations for improvements in direct care or care measurement cannot just be evidence-based but must also be realistic. On the list of realistic: ordering antipsychotics for symptoms of dementia in the elderly, despite recommendations to not do so; ordering antidepressants without fear that the patient could develop hypertension; mental health care providers in primary care offices; forced choice for opioid management; plus agenda setting for visit efficiency. Not yet realistic: Trigger tools to identify adverse events, and pharmacist recommendations related to pain management before opioid visits. Pneumococcal vaccine compliance is only realistic if recommendations are not recurrently changed, are paid for, and if prior immunizations are known. Increasing task delegation to prevent clinician burnout is not realistic if it burns out the nurses, or if the helpful scribes cannot be afforded. Helpful, yet questionably realistic: Primary care clinician involvement for patients in intensive care units and their families, and problem-solving therapy by family physicians. And, let us add 'frightening': few international medical school graduates to serve the underserved. The most frequent diagnoses and most critical diagnoses in family medicine are elucidated. (J Am Board Fam Med 2018;31:1- 4.).

AB - Being realistic while helping our patients is this issue's theme. Given the volume of tasks required in family medicine, recommendations for improvements in direct care or care measurement cannot just be evidence-based but must also be realistic. On the list of realistic: ordering antipsychotics for symptoms of dementia in the elderly, despite recommendations to not do so; ordering antidepressants without fear that the patient could develop hypertension; mental health care providers in primary care offices; forced choice for opioid management; plus agenda setting for visit efficiency. Not yet realistic: Trigger tools to identify adverse events, and pharmacist recommendations related to pain management before opioid visits. Pneumococcal vaccine compliance is only realistic if recommendations are not recurrently changed, are paid for, and if prior immunizations are known. Increasing task delegation to prevent clinician burnout is not realistic if it burns out the nurses, or if the helpful scribes cannot be afforded. Helpful, yet questionably realistic: Primary care clinician involvement for patients in intensive care units and their families, and problem-solving therapy by family physicians. And, let us add 'frightening': few international medical school graduates to serve the underserved. The most frequent diagnoses and most critical diagnoses in family medicine are elucidated. (J Am Board Fam Med 2018;31:1- 4.).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044347402&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044347402&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3122/jabfm.2018.01.170422

DO - 10.3122/jabfm.2018.01.170422

M3 - Review article

C2 - 29330232

AN - SCOPUS:85044347402

VL - 31

SP - 1

EP - 4

JO - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

JF - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

SN - 1557-2625

IS - 1

ER -