Intraobserver and interobserver reliability in laryngopharyngeal sensory discrimination thresholds

A pilot study

Jeffrey J. Cunningham, Stacey L. Halum, Susan G. Butler, Gregory N Postma

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Laryngopharyngeal sensory discrimination threshold (LPSDT) testing is a method used to detect sensory deficits in patients in whom swallowing disorders are suspected. LPSDTs have been used to stratify patient risk status with regard to aspiration and to guide dietary management. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of LPSDT testing among a group of examiners with differing levels of testing experience. Methods: Twenty-seven healthy volunteers were enrolled in the study to elicit LPSDTs for intraobserver and interobserver reliability measurements. The examiners represented 3 levels of testing experience: an attending laryngologist, a laryngology fellow, and an otolaryngology resident. With the examiners blinded to test results, each subject was examined twice by one examiner and once by a different examiner in an alternating fashion. Results: Six subjects were unable to tolerate the examinations because of coughing and gagging. Spearman rank correlations revealed strong intraobserver reliability for the experienced endoscopists (ie, attending and fellow) but poor reliability for the novice endoscopist (ie, resident). Poor interobserver reliability regardless of endoscopy experience was found. Eighteen percent of the participants demonstrated LPSDTs of more than 4.0 mm Hg (above normal). Conclusions: 1) Intraobserver reliability was good for experienced endoscopists. 2) Interobserver LPSDT agreement between endoscopists was poor. 3) Eighteen percent of the subjects demonstrated elevated LPSDT thresholds of more than 4 mm Hg.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)582-588
Number of pages7
JournalAnnals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology
Volume116
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2007

Fingerprint

Sensory Thresholds
Otolaryngology
Gagging
Deglutition Disorders
Endoscopy
Healthy Volunteers
Discrimination (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Adductor reflex
  • Larynx
  • Sensory testing
  • Swallowing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Intraobserver and interobserver reliability in laryngopharyngeal sensory discrimination thresholds : A pilot study. / Cunningham, Jeffrey J.; Halum, Stacey L.; Butler, Susan G.; Postma, Gregory N.

In: Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, Vol. 116, No. 8, 01.01.2007, p. 582-588.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6216e1413d8045ff856bd09135024642,
title = "Intraobserver and interobserver reliability in laryngopharyngeal sensory discrimination thresholds: A pilot study",
abstract = "Objectives: Laryngopharyngeal sensory discrimination threshold (LPSDT) testing is a method used to detect sensory deficits in patients in whom swallowing disorders are suspected. LPSDTs have been used to stratify patient risk status with regard to aspiration and to guide dietary management. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of LPSDT testing among a group of examiners with differing levels of testing experience. Methods: Twenty-seven healthy volunteers were enrolled in the study to elicit LPSDTs for intraobserver and interobserver reliability measurements. The examiners represented 3 levels of testing experience: an attending laryngologist, a laryngology fellow, and an otolaryngology resident. With the examiners blinded to test results, each subject was examined twice by one examiner and once by a different examiner in an alternating fashion. Results: Six subjects were unable to tolerate the examinations because of coughing and gagging. Spearman rank correlations revealed strong intraobserver reliability for the experienced endoscopists (ie, attending and fellow) but poor reliability for the novice endoscopist (ie, resident). Poor interobserver reliability regardless of endoscopy experience was found. Eighteen percent of the participants demonstrated LPSDTs of more than 4.0 mm Hg (above normal). Conclusions: 1) Intraobserver reliability was good for experienced endoscopists. 2) Interobserver LPSDT agreement between endoscopists was poor. 3) Eighteen percent of the subjects demonstrated elevated LPSDT thresholds of more than 4 mm Hg.",
keywords = "Adductor reflex, Larynx, Sensory testing, Swallowing",
author = "Cunningham, {Jeffrey J.} and Halum, {Stacey L.} and Butler, {Susan G.} and Postma, {Gregory N}",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/000348940711600805",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "116",
pages = "582--588",
journal = "Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology",
issn = "0003-4894",
publisher = "Annals Publishing Company",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intraobserver and interobserver reliability in laryngopharyngeal sensory discrimination thresholds

T2 - A pilot study

AU - Cunningham, Jeffrey J.

AU - Halum, Stacey L.

AU - Butler, Susan G.

AU - Postma, Gregory N

PY - 2007/1/1

Y1 - 2007/1/1

N2 - Objectives: Laryngopharyngeal sensory discrimination threshold (LPSDT) testing is a method used to detect sensory deficits in patients in whom swallowing disorders are suspected. LPSDTs have been used to stratify patient risk status with regard to aspiration and to guide dietary management. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of LPSDT testing among a group of examiners with differing levels of testing experience. Methods: Twenty-seven healthy volunteers were enrolled in the study to elicit LPSDTs for intraobserver and interobserver reliability measurements. The examiners represented 3 levels of testing experience: an attending laryngologist, a laryngology fellow, and an otolaryngology resident. With the examiners blinded to test results, each subject was examined twice by one examiner and once by a different examiner in an alternating fashion. Results: Six subjects were unable to tolerate the examinations because of coughing and gagging. Spearman rank correlations revealed strong intraobserver reliability for the experienced endoscopists (ie, attending and fellow) but poor reliability for the novice endoscopist (ie, resident). Poor interobserver reliability regardless of endoscopy experience was found. Eighteen percent of the participants demonstrated LPSDTs of more than 4.0 mm Hg (above normal). Conclusions: 1) Intraobserver reliability was good for experienced endoscopists. 2) Interobserver LPSDT agreement between endoscopists was poor. 3) Eighteen percent of the subjects demonstrated elevated LPSDT thresholds of more than 4 mm Hg.

AB - Objectives: Laryngopharyngeal sensory discrimination threshold (LPSDT) testing is a method used to detect sensory deficits in patients in whom swallowing disorders are suspected. LPSDTs have been used to stratify patient risk status with regard to aspiration and to guide dietary management. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of LPSDT testing among a group of examiners with differing levels of testing experience. Methods: Twenty-seven healthy volunteers were enrolled in the study to elicit LPSDTs for intraobserver and interobserver reliability measurements. The examiners represented 3 levels of testing experience: an attending laryngologist, a laryngology fellow, and an otolaryngology resident. With the examiners blinded to test results, each subject was examined twice by one examiner and once by a different examiner in an alternating fashion. Results: Six subjects were unable to tolerate the examinations because of coughing and gagging. Spearman rank correlations revealed strong intraobserver reliability for the experienced endoscopists (ie, attending and fellow) but poor reliability for the novice endoscopist (ie, resident). Poor interobserver reliability regardless of endoscopy experience was found. Eighteen percent of the participants demonstrated LPSDTs of more than 4.0 mm Hg (above normal). Conclusions: 1) Intraobserver reliability was good for experienced endoscopists. 2) Interobserver LPSDT agreement between endoscopists was poor. 3) Eighteen percent of the subjects demonstrated elevated LPSDT thresholds of more than 4 mm Hg.

KW - Adductor reflex

KW - Larynx

KW - Sensory testing

KW - Swallowing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548224587&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548224587&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/000348940711600805

DO - 10.1177/000348940711600805

M3 - Article

VL - 116

SP - 582

EP - 588

JO - Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology

JF - Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology

SN - 0003-4894

IS - 8

ER -