Invasive hemodynamic monitoring in obstetrics; A critical review of its indications, benefits, complications, and alternatives

T. E. Nolan, M. L. Wakefield, L. D. Devoe

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The monitoring of critically ill obstetric patients occasionally requires a level of consistent and reliable hemodynamic information which may be difficult to obtain by noninvasive means. Unusual acute demands for volume replacement undoubtedly support a continuing role for central vascular catheter placement. The decision to use a pulmonary artery catheter must weigh the perceived value of such information or therapy against the potential risk. A risk-benefit analysis for pulmonary artery catheter monitoring in obstetric patients should be completed as promptly as possible to aid the processes of clinical decision-making and informed consent. In each case, one must answer the question of whether sufficient data for competent medical management can be obtained through less invasive, safer methods. The continued development of sophisticated, noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring tools suggests that clinical alternatives will become more available for critical obstetric care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1429-1433
Number of pages5
JournalCHEST
Volume101
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1992

Fingerprint

Obstetrics
Hemodynamics
Pulmonary Artery
Catheters
Vascular Access Devices
Critical Care
Informed Consent
Critical Illness
Therapeutics
Clinical Decision-Making

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Invasive hemodynamic monitoring in obstetrics; A critical review of its indications, benefits, complications, and alternatives. / Nolan, T. E.; Wakefield, M. L.; Devoe, L. D.

In: CHEST, Vol. 101, No. 5, 01.01.1992, p. 1429-1433.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{5c481962d5174a6fb00db82d33e0c741,
title = "Invasive hemodynamic monitoring in obstetrics; A critical review of its indications, benefits, complications, and alternatives",
abstract = "The monitoring of critically ill obstetric patients occasionally requires a level of consistent and reliable hemodynamic information which may be difficult to obtain by noninvasive means. Unusual acute demands for volume replacement undoubtedly support a continuing role for central vascular catheter placement. The decision to use a pulmonary artery catheter must weigh the perceived value of such information or therapy against the potential risk. A risk-benefit analysis for pulmonary artery catheter monitoring in obstetric patients should be completed as promptly as possible to aid the processes of clinical decision-making and informed consent. In each case, one must answer the question of whether sufficient data for competent medical management can be obtained through less invasive, safer methods. The continued development of sophisticated, noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring tools suggests that clinical alternatives will become more available for critical obstetric care.",
author = "Nolan, {T. E.} and Wakefield, {M. L.} and Devoe, {L. D.}",
year = "1992",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1378/chest.101.5.1429",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "101",
pages = "1429--1433",
journal = "Chest",
issn = "0012-3692",
publisher = "American College of Chest Physicians",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Invasive hemodynamic monitoring in obstetrics; A critical review of its indications, benefits, complications, and alternatives

AU - Nolan, T. E.

AU - Wakefield, M. L.

AU - Devoe, L. D.

PY - 1992/1/1

Y1 - 1992/1/1

N2 - The monitoring of critically ill obstetric patients occasionally requires a level of consistent and reliable hemodynamic information which may be difficult to obtain by noninvasive means. Unusual acute demands for volume replacement undoubtedly support a continuing role for central vascular catheter placement. The decision to use a pulmonary artery catheter must weigh the perceived value of such information or therapy against the potential risk. A risk-benefit analysis for pulmonary artery catheter monitoring in obstetric patients should be completed as promptly as possible to aid the processes of clinical decision-making and informed consent. In each case, one must answer the question of whether sufficient data for competent medical management can be obtained through less invasive, safer methods. The continued development of sophisticated, noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring tools suggests that clinical alternatives will become more available for critical obstetric care.

AB - The monitoring of critically ill obstetric patients occasionally requires a level of consistent and reliable hemodynamic information which may be difficult to obtain by noninvasive means. Unusual acute demands for volume replacement undoubtedly support a continuing role for central vascular catheter placement. The decision to use a pulmonary artery catheter must weigh the perceived value of such information or therapy against the potential risk. A risk-benefit analysis for pulmonary artery catheter monitoring in obstetric patients should be completed as promptly as possible to aid the processes of clinical decision-making and informed consent. In each case, one must answer the question of whether sufficient data for competent medical management can be obtained through less invasive, safer methods. The continued development of sophisticated, noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring tools suggests that clinical alternatives will become more available for critical obstetric care.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026753591&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026753591&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1378/chest.101.5.1429

DO - 10.1378/chest.101.5.1429

M3 - Review article

C2 - 1582312

AN - SCOPUS:0026753591

VL - 101

SP - 1429

EP - 1433

JO - Chest

JF - Chest

SN - 0012-3692

IS - 5

ER -