Invasive hemodynamic monitoring in obstetrics; A critical review of its indications, benefits, complications, and alternatives

T. E. Nolan, M. L. Wakefield, L. D. Devoe

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

31 Scopus citations


The monitoring of critically ill obstetric patients occasionally requires a level of consistent and reliable hemodynamic information which may be difficult to obtain by noninvasive means. Unusual acute demands for volume replacement undoubtedly support a continuing role for central vascular catheter placement. The decision to use a pulmonary artery catheter must weigh the perceived value of such information or therapy against the potential risk. A risk-benefit analysis for pulmonary artery catheter monitoring in obstetric patients should be completed as promptly as possible to aid the processes of clinical decision-making and informed consent. In each case, one must answer the question of whether sufficient data for competent medical management can be obtained through less invasive, safer methods. The continued development of sophisticated, noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring tools suggests that clinical alternatives will become more available for critical obstetric care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1429-1433
Number of pages5
Issue number5
StatePublished - Jan 1 1992


ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this