Investigating the Origins of the Gender Gap in Support for War

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Gender is an important source of influence on foreign policy attitudes but has received less research attention than it deserves. In the United States, gender differences on support for military interventions average around 8 percent, with women less likely than men to support the use of force. This gap has surfaced in many conflicts, including World War II, the Korean and Vietnam wars, through to the Gulf War and the conflict in Iraq. The existence of a modest though persistent gender difference in support of the use of military force thus arouses considerable interest among political researchers. This piece critically discusses four explanations, the empirical evidence to date, and future directions for studying and testing the origins of this gender gap. The four explanations are economic/political marginalization, feminist identity, Social Role Theory, and value differences.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)124-135
Number of pages12
JournalPolitical Studies Review
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2019

Fingerprint

gender-specific factors
Korean War
role theory
Vietnam War
gulf war
military intervention
political interest
gender
Social Role
World War II
Iraq
foreign policy
Military
evidence
economics
Values

Keywords

  • gender gap
  • public opinion
  • support for war

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Investigating the Origins of the Gender Gap in Support for War. / Lizotte, Mary-Kate.

In: Political Studies Review, Vol. 17, No. 2, 01.05.2019, p. 124-135.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{236770ae1c1b4ab6ba5616917e01ea1d,
title = "Investigating the Origins of the Gender Gap in Support for War",
abstract = "Gender is an important source of influence on foreign policy attitudes but has received less research attention than it deserves. In the United States, gender differences on support for military interventions average around 8 percent, with women less likely than men to support the use of force. This gap has surfaced in many conflicts, including World War II, the Korean and Vietnam wars, through to the Gulf War and the conflict in Iraq. The existence of a modest though persistent gender difference in support of the use of military force thus arouses considerable interest among political researchers. This piece critically discusses four explanations, the empirical evidence to date, and future directions for studying and testing the origins of this gender gap. The four explanations are economic/political marginalization, feminist identity, Social Role Theory, and value differences.",
keywords = "gender gap, public opinion, support for war",
author = "Mary-Kate Lizotte",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1478929917699416",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "124--135",
journal = "Political Studies Review",
issn = "1478-9299",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Investigating the Origins of the Gender Gap in Support for War

AU - Lizotte, Mary-Kate

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - Gender is an important source of influence on foreign policy attitudes but has received less research attention than it deserves. In the United States, gender differences on support for military interventions average around 8 percent, with women less likely than men to support the use of force. This gap has surfaced in many conflicts, including World War II, the Korean and Vietnam wars, through to the Gulf War and the conflict in Iraq. The existence of a modest though persistent gender difference in support of the use of military force thus arouses considerable interest among political researchers. This piece critically discusses four explanations, the empirical evidence to date, and future directions for studying and testing the origins of this gender gap. The four explanations are economic/political marginalization, feminist identity, Social Role Theory, and value differences.

AB - Gender is an important source of influence on foreign policy attitudes but has received less research attention than it deserves. In the United States, gender differences on support for military interventions average around 8 percent, with women less likely than men to support the use of force. This gap has surfaced in many conflicts, including World War II, the Korean and Vietnam wars, through to the Gulf War and the conflict in Iraq. The existence of a modest though persistent gender difference in support of the use of military force thus arouses considerable interest among political researchers. This piece critically discusses four explanations, the empirical evidence to date, and future directions for studying and testing the origins of this gender gap. The four explanations are economic/political marginalization, feminist identity, Social Role Theory, and value differences.

KW - gender gap

KW - public opinion

KW - support for war

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041381847&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041381847&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1478929917699416

DO - 10.1177/1478929917699416

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 124

EP - 135

JO - Political Studies Review

JF - Political Studies Review

SN - 1478-9299

IS - 2

ER -