Is dichotic word listening a valid predictor of cerebral language dominance?

G. P. Lee, D. W. Loring, J. R. Newell, K. J. Meador

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although the pattern of ear asymmetry derived from dichotically presented verbal stimuli is used to predict cerebral language dominance, the reliability of this procedure for individual patients has not been adequately established. To determine the accuracy with which verbal dichotic stimuli can predict cerebral language dominance, dichotic word listening performances of 106 patients whose language dominance had been determined by Wada (intracarotid amobarbital) testing were examined. On a group level, ear advantages were in the expected direction, however, no statistically significant differences between left, bilateral, and right language dominance patients were obtained. Predicting side of language dominance was even more ineffective in the individual patient regardless of ear asymmetry criterion. Results suggest that the dichotic word listening task employed in this study is not a valid predictor of cerebral language dominance in adults. Thus, caution should be exercised when inferring language lateralization based solely upon dichotic word listening performance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)429-438
Number of pages10
JournalClinical Neuropsychologist
Volume8
Issue number4
StatePublished - Dec 1 1994

Fingerprint

Cerebral Dominance
Language
Ear
Amobarbital
Predictors
Language Dominance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Lee, G. P., Loring, D. W., Newell, J. R., & Meador, K. J. (1994). Is dichotic word listening a valid predictor of cerebral language dominance? Clinical Neuropsychologist, 8(4), 429-438.

Is dichotic word listening a valid predictor of cerebral language dominance? / Lee, G. P.; Loring, D. W.; Newell, J. R.; Meador, K. J.

In: Clinical Neuropsychologist, Vol. 8, No. 4, 01.12.1994, p. 429-438.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lee, GP, Loring, DW, Newell, JR & Meador, KJ 1994, 'Is dichotic word listening a valid predictor of cerebral language dominance?', Clinical Neuropsychologist, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 429-438.
Lee GP, Loring DW, Newell JR, Meador KJ. Is dichotic word listening a valid predictor of cerebral language dominance? Clinical Neuropsychologist. 1994 Dec 1;8(4):429-438.
Lee, G. P. ; Loring, D. W. ; Newell, J. R. ; Meador, K. J. / Is dichotic word listening a valid predictor of cerebral language dominance?. In: Clinical Neuropsychologist. 1994 ; Vol. 8, No. 4. pp. 429-438.
@article{a0521822629940b7802c70179524f79d,
title = "Is dichotic word listening a valid predictor of cerebral language dominance?",
abstract = "Although the pattern of ear asymmetry derived from dichotically presented verbal stimuli is used to predict cerebral language dominance, the reliability of this procedure for individual patients has not been adequately established. To determine the accuracy with which verbal dichotic stimuli can predict cerebral language dominance, dichotic word listening performances of 106 patients whose language dominance had been determined by Wada (intracarotid amobarbital) testing were examined. On a group level, ear advantages were in the expected direction, however, no statistically significant differences between left, bilateral, and right language dominance patients were obtained. Predicting side of language dominance was even more ineffective in the individual patient regardless of ear asymmetry criterion. Results suggest that the dichotic word listening task employed in this study is not a valid predictor of cerebral language dominance in adults. Thus, caution should be exercised when inferring language lateralization based solely upon dichotic word listening performance.",
author = "Lee, {G. P.} and Loring, {D. W.} and Newell, {J. R.} and Meador, {K. J.}",
year = "1994",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "429--438",
journal = "Clinical Neuropsychologist",
issn = "0920-1637",
publisher = "Swets & Zeitlinger",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is dichotic word listening a valid predictor of cerebral language dominance?

AU - Lee, G. P.

AU - Loring, D. W.

AU - Newell, J. R.

AU - Meador, K. J.

PY - 1994/12/1

Y1 - 1994/12/1

N2 - Although the pattern of ear asymmetry derived from dichotically presented verbal stimuli is used to predict cerebral language dominance, the reliability of this procedure for individual patients has not been adequately established. To determine the accuracy with which verbal dichotic stimuli can predict cerebral language dominance, dichotic word listening performances of 106 patients whose language dominance had been determined by Wada (intracarotid amobarbital) testing were examined. On a group level, ear advantages were in the expected direction, however, no statistically significant differences between left, bilateral, and right language dominance patients were obtained. Predicting side of language dominance was even more ineffective in the individual patient regardless of ear asymmetry criterion. Results suggest that the dichotic word listening task employed in this study is not a valid predictor of cerebral language dominance in adults. Thus, caution should be exercised when inferring language lateralization based solely upon dichotic word listening performance.

AB - Although the pattern of ear asymmetry derived from dichotically presented verbal stimuli is used to predict cerebral language dominance, the reliability of this procedure for individual patients has not been adequately established. To determine the accuracy with which verbal dichotic stimuli can predict cerebral language dominance, dichotic word listening performances of 106 patients whose language dominance had been determined by Wada (intracarotid amobarbital) testing were examined. On a group level, ear advantages were in the expected direction, however, no statistically significant differences between left, bilateral, and right language dominance patients were obtained. Predicting side of language dominance was even more ineffective in the individual patient regardless of ear asymmetry criterion. Results suggest that the dichotic word listening task employed in this study is not a valid predictor of cerebral language dominance in adults. Thus, caution should be exercised when inferring language lateralization based solely upon dichotic word listening performance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028566891&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028566891&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 429

EP - 438

JO - Clinical Neuropsychologist

JF - Clinical Neuropsychologist

SN - 0920-1637

IS - 4

ER -