"It takes a village" to raise research productivity

Impact of a Trauma Interdisciplinary Group for Research at an urban, Level 1 trauma center

Elizabeth G. NeSmith, Regina S. Medeiros, Colville Harvey Bernado Ferdinand, Michael L Hawkins, Steven B Holsten, Haidong Zhu, Yanbin Dong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few interdisciplinary research groups include basic scientists, pharmacists, therapists, nutritionists, laboratory technicians, as well as trauma patients and families, in addition to clinicians. Increasing interprofessional diversity within scientific teams working to improve trauma care is a goal of national organizations and federal funding agencies such as the National Institutes of Health (NIH). This article describes the design, implementation, and outcomes of a Trauma Interdisciplinary Group for Research (TIGR) at a Level 1 trauma center as it relates to increasing research productivity, with specific examples excerpted from an ongoing NIH-funded study. METHODS: We used a pretest/posttest design with objectives aimed at measuring increases in research productivity following a targeted intervention. A SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) analysis was used to develop the intervention, which included research skill-building activities, accomplished by adding multidisciplinary investigators to an existing NIH-funded project. The NIH project aimed to test the hypothesis that accelerated biologic aging from chronic stress increases baseline inflammation and reduces inflammatory response to trauma (projected n = 150). Pre-TIGR/post-TIGR data related to participant screening, recruitment, consent, and research processes were compared. Research productivity was measured through abstracts, publications, and investigator-initiated projects. RESULTS: Research products increased from 12 to 42 (approximately 400%). Research proposals for federal funding increased from 0 to 3, with success rate of 66%. Participant screenings for the NIH-funded study increased from 40 to 313. Consents increased from 14 to 70. Laboratory service fees were reduced from $300 per participant to $5 per participant. CONCLUSION: Adding diversity to our scientific team via TIGR was exponentially successful in (1) improving research productivity, (2) reducing research costs, and (3) increasing research products and mentoring activities that the team before TIGR had not entertained. The team is now well positioned to apply for more federally funded projects, and more trauma clinicians are considering research careers than before.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)173-178
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
Volume75
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2013

Fingerprint

Trauma Centers
Wounds and Injuries
Research
National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Research Personnel
Laboratory Personnel
Fee-for-Service Plans
Nutritionists
Pharmacists

Keywords

  • Interdisciplinary communication
  • Multiple trauma
  • Research activity
  • Trauma centers
  • Wounds and injuries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

"It takes a village" to raise research productivity : Impact of a Trauma Interdisciplinary Group for Research at an urban, Level 1 trauma center. / NeSmith, Elizabeth G.; Medeiros, Regina S.; Ferdinand, Colville Harvey Bernado; Hawkins, Michael L; Holsten, Steven B; Zhu, Haidong; Dong, Yanbin.

In: Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Vol. 75, No. 1, 01.07.2013, p. 173-178.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b0f7e067de52498d9e9fd74250a63279,
title = "{"}It takes a village{"} to raise research productivity: Impact of a Trauma Interdisciplinary Group for Research at an urban, Level 1 trauma center",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Few interdisciplinary research groups include basic scientists, pharmacists, therapists, nutritionists, laboratory technicians, as well as trauma patients and families, in addition to clinicians. Increasing interprofessional diversity within scientific teams working to improve trauma care is a goal of national organizations and federal funding agencies such as the National Institutes of Health (NIH). This article describes the design, implementation, and outcomes of a Trauma Interdisciplinary Group for Research (TIGR) at a Level 1 trauma center as it relates to increasing research productivity, with specific examples excerpted from an ongoing NIH-funded study. METHODS: We used a pretest/posttest design with objectives aimed at measuring increases in research productivity following a targeted intervention. A SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) analysis was used to develop the intervention, which included research skill-building activities, accomplished by adding multidisciplinary investigators to an existing NIH-funded project. The NIH project aimed to test the hypothesis that accelerated biologic aging from chronic stress increases baseline inflammation and reduces inflammatory response to trauma (projected n = 150). Pre-TIGR/post-TIGR data related to participant screening, recruitment, consent, and research processes were compared. Research productivity was measured through abstracts, publications, and investigator-initiated projects. RESULTS: Research products increased from 12 to 42 (approximately 400{\%}). Research proposals for federal funding increased from 0 to 3, with success rate of 66{\%}. Participant screenings for the NIH-funded study increased from 40 to 313. Consents increased from 14 to 70. Laboratory service fees were reduced from $300 per participant to $5 per participant. CONCLUSION: Adding diversity to our scientific team via TIGR was exponentially successful in (1) improving research productivity, (2) reducing research costs, and (3) increasing research products and mentoring activities that the team before TIGR had not entertained. The team is now well positioned to apply for more federally funded projects, and more trauma clinicians are considering research careers than before.",
keywords = "Interdisciplinary communication, Multiple trauma, Research activity, Trauma centers, Wounds and injuries",
author = "NeSmith, {Elizabeth G.} and Medeiros, {Regina S.} and Ferdinand, {Colville Harvey Bernado} and Hawkins, {Michael L} and Holsten, {Steven B} and Haidong Zhu and Yanbin Dong",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/TA.0b013e31829383c4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "75",
pages = "173--178",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - "It takes a village" to raise research productivity

T2 - Impact of a Trauma Interdisciplinary Group for Research at an urban, Level 1 trauma center

AU - NeSmith, Elizabeth G.

AU - Medeiros, Regina S.

AU - Ferdinand, Colville Harvey Bernado

AU - Hawkins, Michael L

AU - Holsten, Steven B

AU - Zhu, Haidong

AU - Dong, Yanbin

PY - 2013/7/1

Y1 - 2013/7/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Few interdisciplinary research groups include basic scientists, pharmacists, therapists, nutritionists, laboratory technicians, as well as trauma patients and families, in addition to clinicians. Increasing interprofessional diversity within scientific teams working to improve trauma care is a goal of national organizations and federal funding agencies such as the National Institutes of Health (NIH). This article describes the design, implementation, and outcomes of a Trauma Interdisciplinary Group for Research (TIGR) at a Level 1 trauma center as it relates to increasing research productivity, with specific examples excerpted from an ongoing NIH-funded study. METHODS: We used a pretest/posttest design with objectives aimed at measuring increases in research productivity following a targeted intervention. A SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) analysis was used to develop the intervention, which included research skill-building activities, accomplished by adding multidisciplinary investigators to an existing NIH-funded project. The NIH project aimed to test the hypothesis that accelerated biologic aging from chronic stress increases baseline inflammation and reduces inflammatory response to trauma (projected n = 150). Pre-TIGR/post-TIGR data related to participant screening, recruitment, consent, and research processes were compared. Research productivity was measured through abstracts, publications, and investigator-initiated projects. RESULTS: Research products increased from 12 to 42 (approximately 400%). Research proposals for federal funding increased from 0 to 3, with success rate of 66%. Participant screenings for the NIH-funded study increased from 40 to 313. Consents increased from 14 to 70. Laboratory service fees were reduced from $300 per participant to $5 per participant. CONCLUSION: Adding diversity to our scientific team via TIGR was exponentially successful in (1) improving research productivity, (2) reducing research costs, and (3) increasing research products and mentoring activities that the team before TIGR had not entertained. The team is now well positioned to apply for more federally funded projects, and more trauma clinicians are considering research careers than before.

AB - BACKGROUND: Few interdisciplinary research groups include basic scientists, pharmacists, therapists, nutritionists, laboratory technicians, as well as trauma patients and families, in addition to clinicians. Increasing interprofessional diversity within scientific teams working to improve trauma care is a goal of national organizations and federal funding agencies such as the National Institutes of Health (NIH). This article describes the design, implementation, and outcomes of a Trauma Interdisciplinary Group for Research (TIGR) at a Level 1 trauma center as it relates to increasing research productivity, with specific examples excerpted from an ongoing NIH-funded study. METHODS: We used a pretest/posttest design with objectives aimed at measuring increases in research productivity following a targeted intervention. A SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) analysis was used to develop the intervention, which included research skill-building activities, accomplished by adding multidisciplinary investigators to an existing NIH-funded project. The NIH project aimed to test the hypothesis that accelerated biologic aging from chronic stress increases baseline inflammation and reduces inflammatory response to trauma (projected n = 150). Pre-TIGR/post-TIGR data related to participant screening, recruitment, consent, and research processes were compared. Research productivity was measured through abstracts, publications, and investigator-initiated projects. RESULTS: Research products increased from 12 to 42 (approximately 400%). Research proposals for federal funding increased from 0 to 3, with success rate of 66%. Participant screenings for the NIH-funded study increased from 40 to 313. Consents increased from 14 to 70. Laboratory service fees were reduced from $300 per participant to $5 per participant. CONCLUSION: Adding diversity to our scientific team via TIGR was exponentially successful in (1) improving research productivity, (2) reducing research costs, and (3) increasing research products and mentoring activities that the team before TIGR had not entertained. The team is now well positioned to apply for more federally funded projects, and more trauma clinicians are considering research careers than before.

KW - Interdisciplinary communication

KW - Multiple trauma

KW - Research activity

KW - Trauma centers

KW - Wounds and injuries

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880295986&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880295986&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/TA.0b013e31829383c4

DO - 10.1097/TA.0b013e31829383c4

M3 - Article

VL - 75

SP - 173

EP - 178

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 1

ER -